PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Pentax Photography > Pentax SLR Lens Discussion

Pentax SLR Lens Discussion Comment on or exchange opinions about any Pentax SLR lenses in this section!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-06-2008, 11:28 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
Oldschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 286
Samigon 28mm

Here's one from my Samigon 28mm f2.8

Oldschool is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 12:10 PM   #32
Pentaxian
 
ftpaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 3,255
Originally Posted by Blue View Post
No mate, it was for off-brand lenses. Tamron, Sigma and Tokina are major 3rd party manufacturers.
I originally though off-brand lenses were anything not made by PentaCanikolympusony
__________________

My Blog < See this? CLICK IT!
My Website < THIS ONE TOO!
Themes of Time
ftpaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 01:17 PM   #33
Pentaxian
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by ftpaddict View Post
I originally though off-brand lenses were anything not made by PentaCanikolympusony
That is a reasonable assumption. Sorry for the confusion.

In the US, the term off-brand means a minor brand or a brand that is re-labeled for a particular store. For example, Ricoh (a minor brand for most of its history) was sold under the Sears name at the Sears store and under the Focal name at the K-mart store. Rikenon, Sears, and Focal are all considered off-brands. Some lenses are considered off-brand just because they were made in limited quantities and/or were not widely sold outside their home markets. Often the off-brand lenses are quite good as you can see from some of the examples posted on this thread.

The cool thing about the off-brand lenses is that aside from the various collectibles (Revuenon, for example), they can often be purchased for very little money and represent the potential for a lot of fun and experimentation.

Steve
__________________
Pentax K10D :: Pentax-M 200/4 :: Tamron 70-150/3.5 (Adaptall-2) :: LZOS MC Jupiter-9 85/2 :: Pentax-A 50/1.7 :: Pentax-M 50/1.7 :: Sigma 50/2.8 EX DG Macro :: Auto-Rikenon 50/1.7 (M42) :: Pentax-FA 35/2 :: Tamron 28/2.5 (Adaptall-2) :: Pentax-DA 18-55/3.5-5.6 :: KMZ MC Zenitar 16/2.8 :: Pentax Bellows-K
stevebrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 03:27 PM   #34
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: DFW Texas
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 45
Let me add an interesting "tid-bit" regarding Promaster......I picked up one recently for a beach vacation. Didn't want to take my nice glass. Looking over my Exif data, it shows the promaster 28-105mm zoom as "SMC Pentax-FA 28-105mm F 4-5.6 (IF)" Interesting as I always thought promaster was supposed to be re-branded Tamron. Oddly enough, the lense still produced some nice shots that I posted elsewhere on this forum.

Maine...

Mark
forensicscientist is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 03:46 PM   #35
Pentaxian
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by forensicscientist View Post
Let me add an interesting "tid-bit" regarding Promaster......I picked up one recently for a beach vacation. Didn't want to take my nice glass. Looking over my Exif data, it shows the promaster 28-105mm zoom as "SMC Pentax-FA 28-105mm F 4-5.6 (IF)" Interesting as I always thought promaster was supposed to be re-branded Tamron. Oddly enough, the lense still produced some nice shots that I posted elsewhere on this forum.

Maine...

Mark
A Promaster/Tamron connection was always my understanding though a Promaster/Pentax connection as well might not be out of the question. On the other hand, the Exif data might be a little suspect. I have a Sigma 50/2.8 Macro that codes in the Exif as a Pentax D FA 50/2.8 Macro. That would be a happy surprise if it were so, but alas the fairies did not transform my Sigma during the night.

Your Maine shots are pretty incredible, by the way. Looks like you made an excellent purchase!

Steve
__________________
Pentax K10D :: Pentax-M 200/4 :: Tamron 70-150/3.5 (Adaptall-2) :: LZOS MC Jupiter-9 85/2 :: Pentax-A 50/1.7 :: Pentax-M 50/1.7 :: Sigma 50/2.8 EX DG Macro :: Auto-Rikenon 50/1.7 (M42) :: Pentax-FA 35/2 :: Tamron 28/2.5 (Adaptall-2) :: Pentax-DA 18-55/3.5-5.6 :: KMZ MC Zenitar 16/2.8 :: Pentax Bellows-K

Last edited by stevebrot; 07-06-2008 at 03:51 PM..
stevebrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 03:50 PM   #36
Loyal Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nowhere, Sweden
Gallery Photos: 3
Posts: 594
The Exif data is wrong. They just happen to have the same ID as the Pentax lenses I am sure.
__________________
My Flickr - Takumar forums
PENTAX K10D, Spotmatic
Asahi Auto Takumar 85/1.8 - Asahi Takumar 105/2.8 135/3.5 - Asahi Super Takumar 20/4.5 50/1.4 55/1.8 85/1.9 105/2.8 135/3.5 150/4 200/4 - Asahi S-M-C Takumar 35/3.5 300/4 - Asahi Macro-Takumar 50/4 100/4
Zewrak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 04:12 PM   #37
Pentaxian
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by forensicscientist View Post
Let me add an interesting "tid-bit" regarding Promaster......I picked up one recently for a beach vacation. Didn't want to take my nice glass. Looking over my Exif data, it shows the promaster 28-105mm zoom as "SMC Pentax-FA 28-105mm F 4-5.6 (IF)" Interesting as I always thought promaster was supposed to be re-branded Tamron. Oddly enough, the lense still produced some nice shots that I posted elsewhere on this forum.

Maine...

Mark
A little more regarding the Pentax-FA 28-105/4-5.6 (IF). According to this site's Pentax lens review database (click here), the Pentax lens was made by Tamron. So the most likely answer is that both lenses were manufactured by Tamron and rebadged as was appropriate. The Exif is a correct from the perspective of what lens was on the camera, though the brand label was a case of mistaken identity.

Steve
__________________
Pentax K10D :: Pentax-M 200/4 :: Tamron 70-150/3.5 (Adaptall-2) :: LZOS MC Jupiter-9 85/2 :: Pentax-A 50/1.7 :: Pentax-M 50/1.7 :: Sigma 50/2.8 EX DG Macro :: Auto-Rikenon 50/1.7 (M42) :: Pentax-FA 35/2 :: Tamron 28/2.5 (Adaptall-2) :: Pentax-DA 18-55/3.5-5.6 :: KMZ MC Zenitar 16/2.8 :: Pentax Bellows-K

Last edited by stevebrot; 07-06-2008 at 04:18 PM..
stevebrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 09:46 PM   #38
Pentaxian
 
maxwell1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Gallery Photos: 1
Posts: 1,769
Kitstar 28mm/F2.8

Plenty sharp wide open



Very sharp at F5.6 and better


100% crop
__________________

My Gallery

Pentax DA 35mm Limited|Pentax FA 50mm|Pentax DA 10-17mm|Pentax DA 12-24mm|Sigma EX DG 24-60mm|Pentax DA*50-135mm
maxwell1295 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 10:01 PM   #39
Pentaxian
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by maxwell1295 View Post
Kitstar 28mm/F2.8
Out curiosity, does your Kitstar resemble Miserere's Toyo?

If I remember correctly, Kitstar was a house brand for Kits Camera before they were purchased by Ritz.

Steve
__________________
Pentax K10D :: Pentax-M 200/4 :: Tamron 70-150/3.5 (Adaptall-2) :: LZOS MC Jupiter-9 85/2 :: Pentax-A 50/1.7 :: Pentax-M 50/1.7 :: Sigma 50/2.8 EX DG Macro :: Auto-Rikenon 50/1.7 (M42) :: Pentax-FA 35/2 :: Tamron 28/2.5 (Adaptall-2) :: Pentax-DA 18-55/3.5-5.6 :: KMZ MC Zenitar 16/2.8 :: Pentax Bellows-K
stevebrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:24 AM   #40
Site Supporter
 
dantuyhoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Gallery Photos: 10
Posts: 997
I have some el cheapo DOT close up filters ( +1, +2 and +4 ) . Does it count if I put it on a Pentax lens ? I tried them on FA50/1.4 which is not " cheap" but not too much expensive either .

The Focal 90-410/4 does not have a filter thread ! M42 in my case .
dantuyhoa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 01:48 AM   #41
Pentaxian
 
ftpaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 3,255
Click on the image to view it in a larger size
Click on the image to view it in a larger size


Industar 50-2 50mm f/3.5 mounted on a Zenit-E. Doesn't get much quirkier than that!
__________________

My Blog < See this? CLICK IT!
My Website < THIS ONE TOO!
Themes of Time
ftpaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 11:57 AM   #42
Pentaxian
 
maxwell1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Gallery Photos: 1
Posts: 1,769
Originally Posted by stevebrot View Post
Out curiosity, does your Kitstar resemble Miserere's Toyo?

If I remember correctly, Kitstar was a house brand for Kits Camera before they were purchased by Ritz.

Steve
It's a M42 lens.....I think the Toyo is a K-Mount. It doesn't have macro markings on it, but it focuses a lot closer than my 24mm Sigma Super Wide Macro did. Lowest marking is 0.3m and it focuses inside of that.




A few more images....no sharpening added. Just some cropping, saturation, contrast, levels/curves, and resize.

@f2.8




@f4


@f8
__________________

My Gallery

Pentax DA 35mm Limited|Pentax FA 50mm|Pentax DA 10-17mm|Pentax DA 12-24mm|Sigma EX DG 24-60mm|Pentax DA*50-135mm

Last edited by maxwell1295; 07-07-2008 at 12:30 PM..
maxwell1295 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:08 PM   #43
Loyal Member
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Gallery Photos: 4
Posts: 336
Steve,
The build quality of my Soligor lenses is very good and equal to Pentax M42 in this respect. The IQ varies according to who made the lens for Soligor and the original cost. My 70-220mm f3.5 C/D zoom is a good performer, although heavy at 3lbs. It does have a tripod mount and is all internal for focusing and zooming. I have a couple 35mm f2.8, T4 lenses that are decent, but they aren't the cheapest Soligors either. It is easy to trash a lens, but you should try one first.

Dave

Originally Posted by stevebrot View Post
I have wondered why there is very little Soligor glass on the used market now. Maybe they all fell apart? Strangely though, back in the late 60's and early 70's, Soligor was a major player in the 3rd-party lens market second to Vivitar. Apparently they had good marketing and/or pricing.
Big Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:30 PM   #44
Pentaxian
 
maxwell1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Gallery Photos: 1
Posts: 1,769
Like Vivitar, Soligor made some good lenses and some bad ones. It all depended on who the original manufacturer was. I had a Soligor 24mm/2.8 lens that was of very high quality. Built like a tank and produced some pretty good images. I just didn't like metering with it, so I ended up letting it go. I much prefer "A" lenses or M42 lenses that can be used in Av mode.
__________________

My Gallery

Pentax DA 35mm Limited|Pentax FA 50mm|Pentax DA 10-17mm|Pentax DA 12-24mm|Sigma EX DG 24-60mm|Pentax DA*50-135mm
maxwell1295 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:32 PM   #45
Site Supporter
 
Nesster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ USA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,233
Yashinon 35/2.8 (screw mount)
Click on the image to view it in a larger size
Click on the image to view it in a larger size


Click on the image to view it in a larger size
Click on the image to view it in a larger size


Vivitar TX 28/2.5 Close Focus:
Click on the image to view it in a larger size
Click on the image to view it in a larger size


Click on the image to view it in a larger size
Click on the image to view it in a larger size


Click on the image to view it in a larger size
Click on the image to view it in a larger size


OK so Yashinon and Vivitar aren't exactly unknown brands, but these particular lenses aren't well known at all.
Nesster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:38 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.