PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Pentax Photography > Pentax SLR Lens Discussion

Pentax SLR Lens Discussion Comment on or exchange opinions about any Pentax SLR lenses in this section!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-22-2008, 01:43 AM   #121
Loyal Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nowhere, Sweden
Gallery Photos: 3
Posts: 594
Originally Posted by jsherman999 View Post
.

Picked up a couple lenses from a friend and an ex-co-worker the past couple days - a
Spotty and some Super Taks, and then later some more Super Taks and a Helios 44.

Since I already have a S-M-C Tak 135 & 200, I figured I'd sell the 150 f/4. After
taking a series of shots this aft/evening, I'm not so sure now.
I hear that alot. And I do not understand it at all. The 150/4 must be one of the most underrated Super Takumars there is. It is excellent, wideopen even. And the focal length is quite different from both the 200 and 135. It's a superb lens and I really do believe it's one of the strongest super takumar tele lenses.

If I were you, I'd keep it. It will not bring in enough cash to justify a selling of it. The bang per buck is too high. I got 2 of them from ebay the past 4 months for about 20$ compare that to my 200mm that cost me 110$ (on the other hand I got a second 200mm for 30$ last week).

It's kind of funny that both of my favourite Super Taks are the cheaper ones, the 55/1.8 and the 150/4.
__________________
My Flickr - Takumar forums
PENTAX K10D, Spotmatic
Asahi Auto Takumar 85/1.8 - Asahi Takumar 105/2.8 135/3.5 - Asahi Super Takumar 20/4.5 50/1.4 55/1.8 85/1.9 105/2.8 135/3.5 150/4 200/4 - Asahi S-M-C Takumar 35/3.5 300/4 - Asahi Macro-Takumar 50/4 100/4
Zewrak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 06:05 AM   #122
Site Supporter
 
Mike Cash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Japan
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 2,540
I can't stand to see this thread below the other lens club threads.




Pentax K20D
S-M-C Takumar 105/2.8

__________________

If Jesus had a camera he would use Takumars.

Aminus3 One-A-Day Photoblog /// My Geotagged Photos
Mike Cash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 07:00 AM   #123
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 86
count me in. I have a few Takumar too.
__________________
K17X2,18,20x2,24/2.8 & 3.5,28/2 & 3.5,30,35/2,50/1.2,55/1.8,85/1.8,120,135/2.5;A15,50/1.4,28-135/4;M40,50/4,150;F50/1.4;Takumar 18X2,28/3.5X4,35/2 & 2.3,35/3.5,50/1.4X4,50/4X4,55/1.8 & 2,85/1.9,105/2.8,135/3.5X3,200/4X2;Fujica 16,28x3,35,50x2,55x3,55macro,85x2,100,135/2.5x4,135/3.5; Vivitar 35-85/2.8x2,70-210/3.5,70-210/2.8-4,90/2.5&2.8,135/2.3;Porst 135/1.8;Tokina 60-120/2.8 (PK & PKA);Tamron 70-150 SF
vanchaz2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 10:38 AM   #124
Pentaxian
 
Fritz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tillamook, OR
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,065
Originally Posted by Mike Cash View Post
I can't stand to see this thread below the other lens club threads.
Then I'll help by giving it another bump.


Not the most beautiful flower, but I do love the colors that the Takumars give.

Super Takumar 55mm f1.8

__________________
Fred

http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic2429_1.gif
Your Current Signature Picture
Fritz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 10:58 AM   #125
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philippines
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 71
From a Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 28mm F3.5 mounted on a Spotmatic F





jake.astig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 11:07 AM   #126
Pentaxian
 
Fritz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tillamook, OR
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,065
Originally Posted by jake.astig View Post
From a Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 28mm F3.5 mounted on a Spotmatic F
Excellent work, I really like the first and last shots. What film were you using?
__________________
Fred

http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic2429_1.gif
Your Current Signature Picture
Fritz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 01:27 PM   #127
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philippines
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by Fritz View Post
Excellent work, I really like the first and last shots. What film were you using?
Thanks Fritz. I think this was on Agfa Vista 400.
jake.astig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 01:29 PM   #128
Loyal Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nowhere, Sweden
Gallery Photos: 3
Posts: 594
Super Takumar 135mm f/3.5






__________________
My Flickr - Takumar forums
PENTAX K10D, Spotmatic
Asahi Auto Takumar 85/1.8 - Asahi Takumar 105/2.8 135/3.5 - Asahi Super Takumar 20/4.5 50/1.4 55/1.8 85/1.9 105/2.8 135/3.5 150/4 200/4 - Asahi S-M-C Takumar 35/3.5 300/4 - Asahi Macro-Takumar 50/4 100/4
Zewrak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 01:38 PM   #129
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philippines
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by Zewrak View Post
Super Takumar 135mm f/3.5






Zewrak,
The 2nd and 3rd images have some kind of glow to it.
Excellent shots! Bravo!
jake.astig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 11:30 PM   #130
Pentaxian
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,156
My S-M-C Takumar 50/1.4, prognosis...terminal

RE: Very soft images at f/1.4 to f/2.8

Originally Posted by stevebrot View Post
I took a close look at the back of the lens and was unable to find any obvious scratches. There is, however, a slight cloudiness that appears to be on the inner surface of the rearmost element right smack at the center of the lens. It is only visible in oblique light. Fungus? Botched CLA? I don't know, but the position is potentially poison.

I will do some additional tests tomorrow and a direct comparison with my other 50s. If it does not perform to par with my Rikenon 50/1.7 or my Pentax-M 50/1.7 (both reputedly inferior to the Tak), I will request a return trip to the seller.

Steve
Well, in a f/2 comparison with the two other lenses (above), the new Tak performed well behind the competition. I took out my macro lens and managed to get a pretty good picture of the culprit:

Name:  IMGP6256.jpg
Views: 275
Size:  57.0 KB


The cloudy stuff on the inner surface of the rear element is circled in RED. It sort of looks like a puff of mold to me. I guess I get to ask the eBay vendor if he is interested in honoring his refund policy.

Steve
__________________
Pentax K10D :: Pentax-M 200/4 :: Tamron 70-150/3.5 (Adaptall-2) :: LZOS MC Jupiter-9 85/2 :: Pentax-A 50/1.7 :: Pentax-M 50/1.7 :: Sigma 50/2.8 EX DG Macro :: Auto-Rikenon 50/1.7 (M42) :: Pentax-FA 35/2 :: Tamron 28/2.5 (Adaptall-2) :: Pentax-DA 18-55/3.5-5.6 :: KMZ MC Zenitar 16/2.8 :: Pentax Bellows-K
stevebrot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 01:29 AM   #131
Loyal Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nowhere, Sweden
Gallery Photos: 3
Posts: 594
Originally Posted by stevebrot View Post
RE: Very soft images at f/1.4 to f/2.8



Well, in a f/2 comparison with the two other lenses (above), the new Tak performed well behind the competition. I took out my macro lens and managed to get a pretty good picture of the culprit:


The cloudy stuff on the inner surface of the rear element is circled in RED. It sort of looks like a puff of mold to me. I guess I get to ask the eBay vendor if he is interested in honoring his refund policy.

Steve
Looks like it could be fungus. Keep it away from your other lenses if you live in a humid enviroment or all your lenses and cameras might look that way, if your unlucky. Google fungus on lenses and compare pictures to yours. Usually they look like small threads or a tiny tiny spiderweb.

Good news is, that the rear element is the easiest to remove and clean . If it really is fungus, see to it that you clean it properly with proper chemicals that kill protein, such as ammoniak (ammonium?). Also make sure that you keep it dry and light where you store it until the cleaning is done, makes it harder to impossible for it to spread.
__________________
My Flickr - Takumar forums
PENTAX K10D, Spotmatic
Asahi Auto Takumar 85/1.8 - Asahi Takumar 105/2.8 135/3.5 - Asahi Super Takumar 20/4.5 50/1.4 55/1.8 85/1.9 105/2.8 135/3.5 150/4 200/4 - Asahi S-M-C Takumar 35/3.5 300/4 - Asahi Macro-Takumar 50/4 100/4

Last edited by Zewrak; 07-23-2008 at 01:47 AM..
Zewrak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 04:49 AM   #132
Site Supporter
 
Mike Cash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Japan
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 2,540
Originally Posted by stevebrot View Post

The cloudy stuff on the inner surface of the rear element is circled in RED. It sort of looks like a puff of mold to me. I guess I get to ask the eBay vendor if he is interested in honoring his refund policy.

Steve
That should have been disclosed in the description and included a photo of the clouding. I have to say one thing for the sellers on Yahoo Japan Auctions, where I get all my stuff, they are pretty scrupulous about disclosing things like that.




Pentax K20D
S-M-C Takumar 105/2.8

__________________

If Jesus had a camera he would use Takumars.

Aminus3 One-A-Day Photoblog /// My Geotagged Photos
Mike Cash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 06:15 AM   #133
Site Supporter
 
gokenin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: lowell,ma
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 405
Mike it looks to me that you like your 105 more than your other Taks. I have to admit I like it more than my longer Taks (200 and 300). Great shots from it by the way
__________________
pentax ,K200D,k100d ,Pentax PZ-1p,spotmatic II
Zooms DA 10-17,Sigma 17-70, FA 28-105 ,Tamron 24-135 and tamron 75-300.Primes-DA21,A28mm, K30mm FA 43mm, DA 70mm K-135 f2.8,M-150, M-200
Takumars -,Super Takumar 35mm f3.5, SuperTakumar 50mm f1.4,Super Takumar 55f1.8 Takumar 85mm F1.9, Takumar 105, Takumar 120mm , Super Takumar 200 f4,, Tele-Takumar 300 f6.5Tamron 1.4 TeleConverter
gokenin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 06:58 AM   #134
Pentaxian
 
maxwell1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Gallery Photos: 1
Posts: 1,773
Good stuff! Today is Tak day for me. I'll take my 28/3.5 + 135/3.5 and shoot with them exclusively all day...
__________________

My Gallery

Pentax DA 35mm Limited|Pentax FA 50mm|Pentax DA 10-17mm|Pentax DA 12-24mm|Sigma EX DG 24-60mm|Pentax DA*50-135mm
maxwell1295 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 07:07 AM   #135
Site Supporter
 
Mike Cash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Japan
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 2,540
Originally Posted by gokenin View Post
Mike it looks to me that you like your 105 more than your other Taks. I have to admit I like it more than my longer Taks (200 and 300). Great shots from it by the way
The choice is dictated by that being the best focal length considering the fact that the bulk of my shooting is done from the driver's seat of my truck while stopped in traffic. 135 is better for reaching out for folks sometimes, but too tight for catching scenes which are directly to the left or right of me. That the 105 does a great job is just an added benefit. I don't use it all that much when I am on foot....but then I don't really shoot all that much on foot. So yeah, most of my posted photos will come from it.

Nothing would tickle me more than to find that I am single-handedly driving up the price of the things.


Click on the image to view it in a larger size
Click on the image to view it in a larger size


Pentax K20D
S-M-C Takumar 105/2.8

__________________

If Jesus had a camera he would use Takumars.

Aminus3 One-A-Day Photoblog /// My Geotagged Photos
Mike Cash is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:06 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.