jgredline: Good to see ya Mike. Where have you been?
It sure is good to see you, especially outside of the Takumar Club--LOL. These are some nice shots with the 17-50 2.8. I love this lens, and now will have to post some shots with it.
I own a lot of lenses, but the 17-50 is my most used. I love the speed and focal range of the lens.
It sure is good to see you, especially outside of the Takumar Club--LOL. These are some nice shots with the 17-50 2.8. I love this lens, and now will have to post some shots with it.
I own a lot of lenses, but the 17-50 is my most used. I love the speed and focal range of the lens.
I have very little use for zooms or auto-focus lenses in my daily shooting, hence all the posting in the Takumar thread. They really are all I use 99% of the time.
I didn't even want the 17-50, but based on last year's experience trying to shoot in the dressing room I knew I needed something wider than my 28-75 (also bought specifically for dance and otherwise seldom used), and something better than my crappy Cosina 19-35/3.5-4.5....and God knows the kit 18-55 wasn't going to cut it. So I hunted around for a lens and it came down to the 17-50 or a similar lens from Sigma. I couldn't find sample photos online from the Sigma that I liked.
Despite having bought it against my own wishes, though, I do like its performance and think it is a fine product.
Mike Cash: Despite having bought it against my own wishes, though, I do like its performance and think it is a fine product.
Glad to hear you like the lens. I agree primes offer better image quality, but the difference, for me, is mostly at larger prints. The Tammy 17-50 exceeds my expectations--I use it for hiking, where a one lens setup is a big advantage for me. Here are a few with it.
Haven't been on here in a while, so many 'clubs' have popped up!
I get to join this one, since I have an XR Di 28-200 3.8/5.6 lens.
You don't have to be a pro to get great results, for example:
(full size can be seen here: http://www.pentaxforums.com/gallery/...97/1_jelly.JPG)