The Tammy Club!

[gkopeliadis]

It would be a great service for us that print large, to have the actual resolution images in quality format. I know that this is difficult sometimes, but is the only way to judge lens (and not everyone’s photographic skills )
Thanks everyone

[Jewelltrail]

The 17-50mm again, with a non-cropped shot @ ISO 160--f 4--1/8th--23.8mm. Converted to Jpg, from Raw, with no PP.

[borno]

Here's one from the 360b, 300mm f2.8 with 1.4x TC

Click on the image to view it in a larger size

And one with no TC

Click on the image to view it in a larger size

One with the adaptall 80-200 f2.8

Click on the image to view it in a larger size

[stevebrot]

Originally Posted by borno

Here's one from the 360b, 300mm f2.8 with 1.4x TC

I really, really, really like the results you have gotten with that lens. Good work!

Steve

[Mike.P®]

Tamron Adaptall 2 SP 70-210mm f3/5 19AH
Got it this morning so took it for a test run.

[wavecurrent]

Here is a shot with the SP 500/F8 55B, some PP.

Mike

[vagrant10]

I now have 3 tamron lenses... 2 I'm very happy with, the other, I am in the process of evaluating so no firm opinions yet. The two I like, I'll post pics, the 18-200 I'll post some pics later.

first, the 28-75:
Camera: Pentax K10D
Exposure: 0.013 sec (1/80)
Aperture: f/2.8
Focal Length: 55 mm
ISO Speed: 100


Camera: Pentax K10D
Exposure: 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture: f/3.2
Focal Length: 28 mm
ISO Speed: 100


Camera: Pentax K10D
Exposure: 0.006 sec (1/160)
Aperture: f/9
Focal Length: 28 mm
ISO Speed: 200


and then there is the 70-300... pictures take a bit more work to deal with ca, but not too much to eliminate the positives. Every time I use it, I always end up thinking, "I can't believe this thing only cost $130!"

Camera: Pentax K10D
Exposure: 0.006 sec (1/160)
Aperture: f/11
Focal Length: 300 mm
ISO Speed: 100


Camera: Pentax K10D
Exposure: 0.004 sec (1/250)
Aperture: f/5
Focal Length: 90 mm
ISO Speed: 200


Camera: Pentax K10D
Exposure: 0.002 sec (1/640)
Aperture: f/10
Focal Length: 240 mm
ISO Speed: 400

[figmental1978]

Here are some photos from my Auto Tamron 35mm 2.8 (M42)

[gpaual]

own 2 Tammy's and about to buy a third ( 17-70 ) or 28-75/2.8....
recent shots taken during b-day celebration days during in which vision and steadiness were somewhat reduced.
any reduction in quality is solely the responsibility og the photographer, and not the lens.

flower f/6.3 - 1/90th - iso 100
osprey f/ 8 ( i think ) 1/30th - iso 100
both manual/tripod ( bird shot with remote )

[Mike Cash]

Halfway through the thread I had to take a detour and go price the 70-300.

Holy crap! They practically give the things away!

[Nesster]

Originally Posted by figmental1978

Here are some photos from my Auto Tamron 35mm 2.8 (M42)

Those are nice photos - this isn't the Auto-Tamron-f by any chance?

[paolojackson]

I am also a fan of the priceperformance of 70-300. Here is one I liked.

[figmental1978]

Originally Posted by Nesster

Those are nice photos - this isn't the Auto-Tamron-f by any chance?

Thanks Nesster. No I don't think it's the f, but here's a link to my blog with some photos of it. I haven't found much info on this lens but I really enjoy using it and it produces some nice shots.

[wavecurrent]

Originally Posted by figmental1978

Thanks Nesster. No I don't think it's the f, but here's a link to my blog with some photos of it. I haven't found much info on this lens but I really enjoy using it and it produces some nice shots.

Have you looked at the tamron adaptall-2 site, I think you ill find it there.

Tamron Adapt-A-Matic 28mm F/2.8 Model PFH-28Au


Mike

[figmental1978]

Originally Posted by wavecurrent

Have you looked at the tamron adaptall-2 site, I think you ill find it there.

Tamron Adapt-A-Matic 28mm F/2.8 Model PFH-28Au


Mike

Wow, thanks Mike. Obviously my searching skills need some brushing up