PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Pentax Photography > Pentax SLR Lens Discussion

Pentax SLR Lens Discussion Comment on or exchange opinions about any Pentax SLR lenses in this section!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-22-2008, 06:16 PM   #16
Site Supporter
 
Nesster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ USA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,233
Some early Zenit SLRs may have had a different size screw mount... I don't have the brain capacity to remember what, but these would be SLR lenses that theoretically might be adaptable. This info should be easily available on the net. The LTMs will be as though on extension tubes: macro.

Since some of us *ahem* have an LTM camera, Russian to be precise, just what LTM lenses are we talking about here?
Nesster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 09:34 PM   #17
Junior Member
 
RioRico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: central Sierra Nevada mountains, California, USA, planet Terra
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 44
Since some of us *ahem* have an LTM camera, Russian to be precise, just what LTM lenses are we talking about here?
My problem lenses are a plain Industar-61 52/2.5 and an elegant Leitz Wetzlar Elmar 90/4. Coming soon: a Jupiter-8 50/2, an Industar-26M 50/2.8, an Industar-61 L/D 55/2.8, maybe a poor Leitz Elmar 50/3.5, maybe others. I don't know yet whether or which of the new lenses will be problems. I don't know yet what I'll do with the FED-2 bodies that will be bundled with those Industars. I don't know yet if I'll be murdered in my sleep. Ah, life is full of surprises.
__________________

Pentax: DA 10-17,18-55,18-250; FA 100-300,50/1.4; ST 40-80M,70-200,135,55,35,28
Other PK: Sig 35-80; Viv 24/2, 90M; Toyo 28; Focal 135; Sakar 500/8 mirror; more
Screwmounts: Vemar 12; Sig 24; Viv 28; Isco 35; Mir-1; Helios-44; Jupiter-9,11;
Meyer 35,50,100,180; Enna 35,100,135,240; Alpa 300; Rubinar 1000/10 mirror; more
RioRico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 09:39 PM   #18
Site Supporter
 
monochrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood, MO (St. Louis area)
Gallery Photos: 5
Posts: 794
SM mount

While I can read that the thread has become a (valuable) technical and history lesson in thread diameters and pitches, doesn't SM stand for Screw Mount?

Is SM Mount a redundancy?
__________________
KX | MESuper | K10D
monochrome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 11:26 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
RioRico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: central Sierra Nevada mountains, California, USA, planet Terra
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 44
Is SM Mount a redundancy?
Yes, screw mount is totally obsolete. Everyone can please send their old obsolete redundant SM lenses to me for proper disposal. Especially the Zeiss, Leitz, Schneider etc SM lenses. They are of no use to anyone now. You might as well include the SM cameras too. I'll take care of them all, for sure.
__________________

Pentax: DA 10-17,18-55,18-250; FA 100-300,50/1.4; ST 40-80M,70-200,135,55,35,28
Other PK: Sig 35-80; Viv 24/2, 90M; Toyo 28; Focal 135; Sakar 500/8 mirror; more
Screwmounts: Vemar 12; Sig 24; Viv 28; Isco 35; Mir-1; Helios-44; Jupiter-9,11;
Meyer 35,50,100,180; Enna 35,100,135,240; Alpa 300; Rubinar 1000/10 mirror; more

Last edited by RioRico; 07-22-2008 at 11:26 PM.. Reason: syntax
RioRico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 04:47 AM   #20
Site Supporter
 
Nesster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ USA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 1,233
Originally Posted by RioRico View Post
My problem lenses are a plain Industar-61 52/2.5 and an elegant Leitz Wetzlar Elmar 90/4. Coming soon: a Jupiter-8 50/2, an Industar-26M 50/2.8, an Industar-61 L/D 55/2.8, maybe a poor Leitz Elmar 50/3.5, maybe others. I don't know yet whether or which of the new lenses will be problems. I don't know yet what I'll do with the FED-2 bodies that will be bundled with those Industars. I don't know yet if I'll be murdered in my sleep. Ah, life is full of surprises.
If they have cameras attached, maybe you can use them... the FED 2 is a cool camera (I only have the FED 3) though the viewfinder's a bit cramped. OTH it's better than an early Leica's.

You have a pretty good sounding LTM lens collection there.
Nesster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:41 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.