PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Pentax Photography > Pentax SLR Lens Discussion

Pentax SLR Lens Discussion Comment on or exchange opinions about any Pentax SLR lenses in this section!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-08-2008, 02:37 PM   #31
Pentaxian
 
Miserere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston
Gallery Photos: 2
Posts: 1,133
Originally Posted by Gooshin View Post
weeellllllll

they COULD have made a mirror and viewfinder the same size as a 35mm SLR, and then simply etch a border in the focusing screen to let you know where your APC's sensor limits are.

its not totaly out of the question...
They could have, but then APS-C lenses don't cast an image circle that covers 35mm film size. There's also the point (if you believe camera makers) that CCD circuitry and stuff take up more space behind the CCD so a larger mirror would make the camera too deep.
__________________
The camera doesn't matter! (But I'll use a Pentax, just in case.)

My articles on PentaxDSLRs blog...../...../...../...../..... Miserere on Flickr

Miserere is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 03:32 PM   #32
Site Supporter
 
k100d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto
Gallery Photos: 8
Posts: 2,172
Originally Posted by rparmar View Post
I have read this a couple of times, with the 77mm being claimed as 80mm or whatever. Does anyone have the tests where this was determined?

IOW, proof would be nice.
Originally Posted by Alfisti View Post
Is the 77 really 79? If the 70 is really 68 then there is 11mm difference not 7mm. It explains a few things.
somebody asked this before and i answered it but the answer went unnoticed. no concrete evidence but the very well known Godfrey mentioned this before in this post i refer to all the time when people bring up the FA77 vs DA70 question. i might as well put it in my sig.

Should I get 77mm or 70mm? - Photo.net Pentax Forum
__________________
THE Arsenal supporter of the forum
Please visit my gallery
k100d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 03:34 PM   #33
Site Supporter
 
k100d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto
Gallery Photos: 8
Posts: 2,172
that's some really good work Pal Jensen, i heard the "rogue engineer" story, but those details really helped. it'd be nice to hear the FA31 story, cuz out of the limiteds, it is probably the best in technical aspects
__________________
THE Arsenal supporter of the forum
Please visit my gallery
k100d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 03:55 PM   #34
Site Supporter
 
rparmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ireland
Gallery Photos: 24
Posts: 1,686
Originally Posted by k100d View Post
no concrete evidence but the very well known Godfrey mentioned this before
Michael Kuhne says "the 70mm comes in at 67.6mm tested" but without evidence. No reason to disbelieve but would be nice to know from where this came. So I've emailed him.
__________________
All images (c) 2008 Robin Parmar. Visit my Flickr images, website, or blog.
rparmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 05:01 AM   #35
Site Supporter
 
rparmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ireland
Gallery Photos: 24
Posts: 1,686
Michael has kindly replied with a reference to the Pop Photo tests. This review states that the DA70 tests out as a 67.5mm f/2.46 lens. Unfortunately the magazine does not provide similar figures for all their tested lenses, for example skipping the DA40 and DA21.

But thankfully they have test values for the FA77, which are an accurate 76.72mm and f/1.88. The DA31 tests at 31.81mm f/1.82. There is no review at all for the FA43 but they remark elsewhere that it "is marketed at its true focal length".

For completeness, and to save you the searching, the DA 14mm f/2.8 tests at 14.30mm f/2.92.

So the 31 / 43 / 77 is an actual 32 / 43 / 77 if one is really picking nits.
__________________
All images (c) 2008 Robin Parmar. Visit my Flickr images, website, or blog.
rparmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 09:34 AM   #36
Loyal Member
 
Arjay Bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bamaga, QLD
Gallery Photos: 3
Posts: 432
31 and 43 are cool cos they are both prime numbers- FWIW
__________________
Cheers, Arjay

Member since 09-09-'06
http://rjbartlett.potd.com.au
http://bamagabound.blogspot.com/
Arjay Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 05:34 PM   #37
Site Supporter
 
roentarre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: melbourne, australia
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 7,134
Originally Posted by NaClH2O View Post
There is a story circulating around (somewhere in the wilds of the web) that the ltd's were originally a private project of Pentax's senior design engineer. It seems that he was an avid amatuer photographer, and those were the focal lengths he liked the most. The lenses weren't designed for production, but after seeing how well they performed Pentax was convinced to produce them commercially.
I have searched but I cannot find where I originally read the above, probably somewhere in the bowels of DPR, but it's a cute story none the less.

NaCl(the other response is "occult numerology" )H2O
Great summary. That was what I heard as well and I like your last response "occult numerology". Hehe So cool!
__________________
My website
My Photo blog
Themes Of Time

Medicine Buddha
roentarre is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:49 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.