Ugh, I like old lenses but that's just over the top. If I had that much money to toss around, I'd get a Tak 85mm and a 77 LTD, and keep the one I like better.
I don't have that kind of money, so a Jupiter 9 will do
Btw...Kevin...is that a Dime I see in your Avy?[/QUOTE]
If you mean the photo - its a very worked Datsun 510/ 1600 here in Aus fitted with a Nissan 2 litre turbo and a very much restored body etc. I had a similar over the top Dato back when they were new early 70's which I wish I still had 30 years on.
I was not only watching this one I was bidding on it! Let’s just say I dropped out long, long, long before the auction ended. I am often astonished at the prices some of the old Pentax glass commands but this one seems to have reached new heights. I guess a lens is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it. I hope the new owner enjoys it.
I just payed $590 for the Takumar 1.8 which is crazy high. But thats half the money spent for the K mount. Mines suppose to be just as good.
I've read articles saying it went for several hundred dollars a few years back and prices have increased since then
At that price I would have went for the * 1.4 also.
The reason I payed the premium is that it is in mint condition. And I just got tired of being out bid. I pick it up today ( fingers crossed )
Yeah, I agree on that. You are right that especially the rare items get skyhigh sometimes.
I also heard once that one should buy camera bodies to fit his lenses. So that is comparable to your recent post.
Only problem is that I get attached to my Pentax body. I simply love it as a great tool. Could I get used to using a Canon, only because it has a great lens attached?
If you mean the photo - its a very worked Datsun 510/ 1600 here in Aus fitted with a Nissan 2 litre turbo and a very much restored body etc. I had a similar over the top Dato back when they were new early 70's which I wish I still had 30 years on.
regards
Kevin
Awesome...I love the "box" look and straight lines. Even though I'm a Honda guy, I would take one in a heartbeat and put an SR20 in it. Too bad they're few and far between here, with all our rust
Originally Posted by 8540tomg
I guess a lens is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it. I hope the new owner enjoys it.
Tom G
It is what it is...if you've been looking and can't find (and are in the heat of an auction), you'll pay more just to have it.
Originally Posted by Syb
I also heard once that one should buy camera bodies to fit his lenses. So that is comparable to your recent post.
Only problem is that I get attached to my Pentax body. I simply love it as a great tool. Could I get used to using a Canon, only because it has a great lens attached?
It's just a comparison...but one I think we all realize having bought into Pentax already.
I was tempted to buy a Contax 167 with a Vario-Sonnar just to use Contax lenses. And I just got a Yashica today (a what now?) Good thing film stuff is cheap.
I was just going to say that it probably was someone (or it takes two of them at least actually) who was very frustrated over not being able to get the A*85/1.4.
And I was also wondering if I could pull that trick: to get an older 85/1.8 (is there also an 85/2.0 version) instead of the 85/1.4...doesn't look like that will happen
Please pentax: Give us a DA*85/1.4!!! I will start save for it as soon as I see it on the road map. My little brother has the A*85/1.4 and I'm so jealous .
Originally Posted by egordon99
Just throwing it out there... Generally Pentax is a great bargain, but when you're talking about hard-to-find items on eBay, prices go berserk!
I remember a FA* 80-200mm f/2.8 once went for $2K. At the time you could have easily bought a Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS and a 30D to mount it on!