PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Pentax Photography > Pentax SLR Lens Discussion

Pentax SLR Lens Discussion Comment on or exchange opinions about any Pentax SLR lenses in this section!

View Poll Results: Which lens?
50mm 1.4 59 50.86%
40mm 2.8 26 22.41%
35mm 2 37 31.90%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 116. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-03-2008, 06:14 AM   #16
Pentaxian
 
ftpaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 3,255
50 all the way. Any aperture.
__________________

My Blog < See this? CLICK IT!
My Website < THIS ONE TOO!
Themes of Time
ftpaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 06:36 AM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Denmark
Gallery Photos: 12
Posts: 35
If you look at www.photozone.de

You can see that the 35mm is the "sharpest"
Sila is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 06:58 AM   #18
Site Supporter
 
Peter Zack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East Coast Canada
Gallery Photos: 61
Posts: 5,100
I've owned the 31,35,40,43 and 50. I currently only own the FA50 f1.4. Fast and excellent IQ. Yes a little soft at 1.4 but it is still usable there and that's a nice aperture for special applications.

The 40 just didn't make any sense to me. Nice lens and very good IQ but I also own a Tamron 28-75 f2.8 and the 40 isn't fast enough to bother keeping.

The 43mm is a stunningly nice lens even when wide open. I only sold mine for cost cutting reasons and hope/will to someday replace it.

The 31mm is in a league of it's own in many ways. I needed the funds for my business and replaced it with a very good Sigma 28mm f1.8.

The 35mm f2 is a fine lens and probably a little better in IQ than the FA50. So between the 2, the question is speed and focal range. Does the extra 1.4 matter to you (one full stop) and do you want something wider? Again I only sold my FA35mm because I need different equipment for my photo work. I might have replaced this lens down the road but I like my Sigma 28mm and the 2 are close enough that the Sigma does just fine.

But for an all around mid length but slightly longer than normal prime the 50 is the best for cost and quality. Sure it has some limits in build and MF focus but as long as you don't use it as a hammer, it should last a lifetime and give great results. Photozone rate the 50 very highly and I read somewhere that Klaus felt it was the best fast fifty available from any company.
__________________
http://photographyandhowto.blogspot.com/
http://peiweddingphotography.googlepages.com/home
http://www.themesoftime.com/Gallery.aspx
Look and think before opening the shutter. The heart and mind are the true lens of the camera.
- Yousuf Karsh

Last edited by Peter Zack; 09-03-2008 at 07:03 AM..
Peter Zack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 09:58 AM   #19
Site Supporter
 
nupentaxian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Arizona
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 289
i guess any of those three is a good choice. which mm do you shoot more/would like to shoot at? that would be the one that i'll be getting if i were u.
__________________


Website
nupentaxian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 06:11 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
SuperJared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Encinitas, CA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 156
Thanks for all the input, guys. I finally decided on the 50 and I certainly like it.

__________________
Equipment for sale :: My Photos
SuperJared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 11:07 PM   #21
Site Supporter
 
roentarre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: melbourne, australia
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 7,134
Originally Posted by Peter Zack View Post
The 40 just didn't make any sense to me. Nice lens and very good IQ but I also own a Tamron 28-75 f2.8 and the 40 isn't fast enough to bother keeping.
That is exactly how I think of 40mm as well.
__________________
My website
My Photo blog
Themes Of Time

Medicine Buddha
roentarre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 03:43 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Spongefingers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 116
I'm still waiting on my FA50 1.4..! I haven't recieved it yet but I know it will be good for me, as the vast majority of shots I take are outdoors in available light. Plus, it will be far and away the fastest lens I have (the next two being a couple of old M42 f1.8 50mm lenses, and the fastest zooms I have are f3.5-5.6.) This factor is really what I'm getting it for.
I'm going to use it on my K10D, and also on an MZ-5n with Fuji Neopan 1600 for super-fast film performance. Also, I'm hoping that 1600 film may negate some of the reported softness of the lens wide open. (A double bonus?)

I only recently discovered that the DA40 is full-frame compatible due to it being a re-working of an old design, so that's one to get in the future. It may be a similar focal length, but I think it's sufficiently different in other ways (compactness, focus speed, quick shift, quite reasonably priced) that it's worth getting as well.

It frustrates me that the compatibility info on Pentax DA lenses is so minimal, that to find out if a DA lens is actually decent on a film body you have to rely on a random third party testing one and posting info on it - but kudos to those who do, Keep doing it.
Spongefingers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 07:53 AM   #23
Junior Member
 
RioRico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: central Sierra Nevada mountains, California, USA, planet Terra
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 44
I hate 'normal' lenses (which might mark me as a deviant). But that's just me. Since I don't make my living at this, I'm free to indulge my prejudices. 'Normal' makes me feel like I'm wearing blinders. Wider lenses IMHO are more flexible, and if I don't like what's happening at the margins, I just step closer, or crop. I use Vivitars 24/2 and 28/2.8. A couple of Takumar 28/2.8s (auto PK and manual M42) should arrive today, so maybe I'll get a new favorite. And the FA 50/1.4 is a real gem.
__________________

Pentax: DA 10-17,18-55,18-250; FA 100-300,50/1.4; ST 40-80M,70-200,135,55,35,28
Other PK: Sig 35-80; Viv 24/2, 90M; Toyo 28; Focal 135; Sakar 500/8 mirror; more
Screwmounts: Vemar 12; Sig 24; Viv 28; Isco 35; Mir-1; Helios-44; Jupiter-9,11;
Meyer 35,50,100,180; Enna 35,100,135,240; Alpa 300; Rubinar 1000/10 mirror; more
RioRico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 08:07 AM   #24
TDN
Member
 
TDN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 82
A 50mm is something every photographer should have in his/her camera bag, in my opinion...

So, the 50mm f1.4
__________________
~TDN
www.tdn9.be - pentaxdigital.tdn9.be
---
|| Pentax *ist DL; Pentax K2 DMD; Pentax SFXn || F 50mm f1.4; A 50mm f1.7; K 17mm f4 fish-eye; A 35-135mm f3.5-4.5; F 70-200mm f4-5.6 ||
TDN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 12:34 PM   #25
MrA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England UK
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 158
I find 50mm too long, so I've voted 35mm f2. Don't forget that 35mm x 1.5 = 52mm anyway. (50mm x1.5 = 75mm). Then again, I have nothing faster than f1.7 at present.

(Currently saving for a 30mm f1.4 or 24mm f1.8 )
__________________
Pentax K100D Super + 18-55 lens | Sigma 24/2.8 | Vivitar MC 28/2.8 | Pentax M 50/1.7 | Meritar 50/2.9 | Industar 50-2 50/3.5 | Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5
MrA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:32 AM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.