I once bought one on eBay that turned out to be in real crappy condition so I backed out of the sale. I had a thread about that but there wasn't much discussion in it worth mentioning here.
I've got the M42 version. I've gotten a couple good bird shots with it but I'm still working out technique. Depending on your experience, it may take some time to get comfortable with it--that's certainly the case for me (partly because this is my only screw mount lens.)
My copy is coated but not SMC and I get a moderate amount of fringing. I haven't come to any definite conclusions about sharpness but my impression is that it can do quite well if handled correctly under good conditions. I've combined it with the AF 1.7x TC--which works reasonably well but, again, I'm not ready to speak to the question of resolution yet--operator error is still too much a variable.
Another thing: it's big and heavy--really big and heavy. I'm reasonably strong but I've got small hands and mounting it on the camera and tripod can be a bit of an adventure. To date, I've only used it from my back porch and I'm not going to to take it out on a shoot until I'm feeling pretty confident about getting good shots from it.
Last edited by dadipentak; 01-16-2009 at 05:39 AM.
Reason: typo
I have a k mount version and it is big and heavy (of course) manual aperture manual focus, it's not internal focus so the camera moves back as you focus closer. Minimum focus I think 30 ft. I have the da300 and 1.7x TC and it is probably sharper, but the 500 has the nice bokeh. A little fringing (warm magenta) but not too bad. I got a bush hawk so I could try to free up my left hand for focus, only tried that twice so far so the jury is still out but it worked ok. I think it would be great on a full size sensor.
One note however, is in the photo, it shows the support dropping vertically, this does nothing for side to side shake, I have found it much petter if it is at an angle off vertical