I did and they are quite dreamy looking. I've often wondered what this lens was like. is it sharper when stopped down or basically the same across the aperture range?
I have my version of this lens. A Tamron 28-75 f2.8 XR Di piece of crap that produces about the same type of image.
Interesting effect... The pool shot with the reflections is great. Looks like the same (or almost the same) effect could be achieved reducing clarity in lightroom though.
Interesting effect... The pool shot with the reflections is great. Looks like the same (or almost the same) effect could be achieved reducing clarity in lightroom though.
That may be... but I've never seen anyone produce a soft focus effect that looked anywhere near this good with software
I did and they are quite dreamy looking. I've often wondered what this lens was like. is it sharper when stopped down or basically the same across the aperture range?
Peter, the FA 85/2.8 is one of these soft focus lenses where you control the soft focus effect by adjusting the aperture. I prefer the other kind, where you adjust the soft focus effect by turning a dedicated ring, independently of the aperture setting, but these are very rare. The only one I have is the Tamron Adaptall 70-150/2.8 Soft Focus, a very good lens, but rather uncommon.
Interesting effect... The pool shot with the reflections is great. Looks like the same (or almost the same) effect could be achieved reducing clarity in lightroom though.
Even if you can achieve the same effect in Photoshop (which is not 100% sure, as stated by Kunik), having to run your pictures through Photoshop is a much clumsier workflow than having the right effect straight out of the box. Here's an analogy: I know that I can correct for chromatic aberrations in Photoshop, but I prefer to have lenses producing pictures exempt of these aberrations in the first place, rather than having to fiddle with the controls in Photoshop for every picture I make!
Photo #1 is excellent.
Had a chance to get this lens awhile back but opted not to.
Guess I have to stick to the built-in soft focus filter on my camera.
Is it broken somehow?
I would have thought in good condition this is a great lens?
I have had it for 1.5 years and the lens developed a serious case of fuzzy photos at any aperture. I sent it in for repair and they said it was wear and tear. Cost me $185.00 to get fixed. Then a month after getting it back it's the same. Going back to service again.
Sharp lens that is all plastic and just not the same quality as I would have hoped. All plastic inside. I used it a lot for work and it's just not built as well as Sigma EX's and Pentax lenses. Last one for me from Tamron.
Then a month after getting it back it's the same. Going back to service again.
Sorry to hear about your trouble with that lens.
Originally Posted by Peter Zack
Last one for me from Tamron.
Hopefully the service will be able to do a proper repair or get you a new one. I've never read about such problems with a Tamron lens before and I would not have thought their lenses are not fit for professional work, but obviously you have had your (bad ) experience.
Here are a few pictures taken today with a rather uncommon lens, the FA 85mm F/2.8 Soft Focus.
Hope you enjoy them.
Cheers!
Abbazz
Interesting effect.
But I have to say that soft focus is not really my thing. If I would know you want such lens I would have shipped you my Hoya 135/2.8. Wide open images from it looked just about the same like those you posted
I have my version of this lens. A Tamron 28-75 f2.8 XR Di piece of crap that produces about the same type of image.
Sorry to hear that Peter. I haven't read much bad about that lens though if people complain about something with this one, it's the build quality. I even read that somebody once "melted" that lens in a car trunk... or was that you?
anyway, to Tamron's defence, my wife has had her 70-300 for over 2 years now and it's every bit as good (relative to the lens) as when we bought it...