PentaxForums.com

Go Back PentaxForums.com > Lenses and Accessories > Pentax SLR Lens Discussion > SMC vs non-SMC versions of Lenses

Pentax SLR Lens Discussion Discuss any Pentax K-mount, screwmount, or medium format SLR lens, as well as filters and attachments.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
08-15-2009, 03:02 PM   #1
Loyal Member
 
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Gallery Photos: 22
Posts: 565
SMC vs non-SMC versions of Lenses

Does anyone know of a review that compares a SMC lens against a non-SMC version of of lens, whether branded "Pentax" or 3rd-party?

It is anecdotal that a difference in colour & contract is visible, (beside external flare control - I presume better internal flare/reflection control might affect contrast), but has anyone tested this under a controlled lighting situation with the same exposure & calibrated WB?

Dan.

Last edited by dosdan; 08-15-2009 at 04:11 PM.
dosdan is online now  
08-16-2009, 05:41 AM   #2
Site Supporter
 
Location: Washington
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 207
Originally Posted by dosdan View Post
Does anyone know of a review that compares a SMC lens against a non-SMC version of of lens, whether branded "Pentax" or 3rd-party?

It is anecdotal that a difference in colour & contract is visible, (beside external flare control - I presume better internal flare/reflection control might affect contrast), but has anyone tested this under a controlled lighting situation with the same exposure & calibrated WB?

Dan.
It cannot be a third party lens and be "SMC". SMC is proprietary to Pentax only.

If you are talking multicoated vs non-multicoated - virtually all modern lenses use multicoating. It is pretty much universally accepted that it provides better contrast and flare reduction by reducing internal reflections between the lens surfaces.

Many years ago, Pentax produced a few Takumar lenses which were not multicoated (The Takumar 105 F2.5 is an example) and they are generally regarded to be mediocre lenses.
pentaxman is offline  
08-16-2009, 06:02 AM   #3
Loyal Member
 
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Gallery Photos: 22
Posts: 565
Originally Posted by pentaxman View Post
It cannot be a third party lens and be "SMC". SMC is proprietary to Pentax only.

If you are talking multicoated vs non-multicoated - virtually all modern lenses use multicoating. It is pretty much universally accepted that it provides better contrast and flare reduction by reducing internal reflections between the lens surfaces.

Many years ago, Pentax produced a few Takumar lenses which were not multicoated (The Takumar 105 F2.5 is an example) and they are generally regarded to be mediocre lenses.
In the case of the SMC Pentax-DA/Tokina 12-24/F4, you have exactly the same lens. The Pentax version has the SMC coating - the Tokina version has its own coating. The SMC version is supposed to be better, but I don't think it has been confirmed under controlled conditions.
dosdan is online now  
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:21 PM.