A poinless exercise: trying several fast portrait teles
This is NOT a test: I was gathering ideas for the ultimate test of portrait lenses and as I was snapping away I tried to photograph the same subjects. Everything was handheld and wide open. The focus point may be off, metering may be bad. No conclusions whatsoever can be made based on the series below
Shot with my old Pentax *ist DS, in Av mode, auto WB, only converted from RAW to JPEG without further adjustments. Resized and sharpened with Absolute Sharpening.
OK, one conclusion that the A* 85/1.4 is a bit of a letdown. Way too much CA in my opinion, even stopped down.
Nice! I just made a request for a fast 85mm lens here: Forget the cheap DA normal lens, where's our cheap DA portrait lens?
so this is very interesting to me. The 85mm f/2 sure looks like a gem! But to me there is no doubt that the 77mm is the winner here. I guess that shouldn't come as a surprise
Except for the Komura and Meyer, which both seem a bit soft, I think they all perform great. My guess is that in real use, the difference in exposure and steadiness will make more difference for IQ than lens used, at the size of these images.
It would have been interesting throwing a new Samyang/Vivitar into your test and see how they would compare.
This test illustrates well why I don't buy or use old lenses... very poor contrast. Old lens coatings simply cannot make it, whatever the reputation of the lens.
Peter, it's funny how you can tell the Zeiss fans from the Pentax fans with the replies on MFL Like I said over there, the 77Ltd and Tak 85/1.9 win it for me. The out of focus rendering of the Pancolar is just a tad better than the 77...although it seems the 77 is a bit sharper and has more detail.
Imho, I think the A*85 produces the most pleasing photos, followed closely by the FA 77. I prefer the Tak 85 f/1.9 over the 85 f/1.8 which aren't far behind the first two. Finally the M 85 f/2.0 surprised me with how well it does and competes very well with the best.
It would have been interesting to see the Helios 40-2 85 f/1.5 in there as well.
Thanks for the interesting responses! It seems that there's never a lens that appeals to everyone's taste. It's fun to see (for me) that many choose the FA77 Limited over the other lenses, although it's not my own favorite. I do agree, however, that between the 85mm f/1.8 SMC Takumar and the 85mm f/1.9 Super-Takumar, the Super is preferred by almost 100% of the viewers (including myself).
Strangely, the A* does not appeal to me anymore. I know it's ultra sharp, but the CA is a big letdown for me considering the price tag of the lens. For instance the Pancolar does not show CA at all.
Tomorrow is my son's 2nd birthday. Today a few friends came over, and that was a great opportunity to take some portraits.
Although I do agree with you the lens does make a difference.
However I'm more worried about colour, and bokeh than contrast.
from the looks of those pic's I'm still interested in the 77mm, and I wouldn't mind a A* 85/1.4 as well.
Asahiflex, is there any chance you'll be doing the same test with a film camera soon?
It might be interesting seeing what those lenses would do on full frame. I wouldn't be suprised if the A* 85/1.4 shines in that test.