PentaxForums.com

Go Back PentaxForums.com > Lenses and Accessories > Pentax SLR Lens Discussion > Helios gurus: M42 or K-mount?

Pentax SLR Lens Discussion Discuss any Pentax K-mount, screwmount, or medium format SLR lens, as well as filters and attachments.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
10-17-2009, 10:34 PM   #1
Loyal Member
 
Location: Laurel, MD
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 862
Helios gurus: M42 or K-mount?

Generally, which mount do you prefer for these lenses and why?

And while your at it, which version (44-x) is your preference? I have also seen some other ones like 77M, how do they compare?
Eruditass is offline  
10-18-2009, 01:00 AM   #2
Site Supporter
 
Location: Tre, Finland
Gallery Photos: 1
Posts: 224
I'm not a guru by any standards but my preference is the third option: The first generation Helios 44 with M39 thread. It's also the only Helios I've got. I use it with a M39->M42->PK adapter setup on my K200D, and lately it has been my most used lens.

The preset aperture is so nice to use in AV mode (though I have to remember to up the EV compensation +1.5-2 to get correct exposures). I usually leave the preset aperture ring at 16 and use the stepless aperture ring to close the aperture as needed.

Only thing I'd like to change about this lens is the focusing. The focus ring is a bit stiff on my copy and the throw is longer than on my other ~50mms so you cant get from the closest focus distance to infinty with one turn. Also the focus ring is at the mount end of the lens so that the built in flash can get in the way of my hand when focusing.

It's also the only lens that looks good on my silver K200D because it's (almost) the same color.
ovim is offline  
10-18-2009, 11:36 AM   #3
Pentaxian
 
Location: Bronx, NY
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 171
All I have is the M42 version but I think a K version would have been nice to avoid the hassale of the adapter. BTW I have the 44-2 and it's sharp even wide open. I got it for $30 shipped from ebay.







Leya216 is offline  
10-18-2009, 11:53 AM   #4
Site Supporter
 
Location: Zetten - The Netherlands
Gallery Photos: 11
Posts: 3,245
I've only got two versions of the Helios 44M, both M42. I like the original M42-version, the Helios-44M (so without extra number).
Rense is offline  
10-18-2009, 11:23 PM   #5
Site Supporter
 
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 2,219
I have the 44M and the 44K-4 MC.

I use the 44K-4 because a) don't need to fiddle with the adapter and b) the 44M has a tiny spot of fungus and is on the DL until I get around to learning how to disassemble/clean lenses.

Really there's not much difference if any. All of the Helios-44X-X lenses perform similarly in my experience.
deadwolfbones is offline  
10-18-2009, 11:39 PM   #6
Loyal Member
 
Location: Laurel, MD
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 862
I would get the K mount for convenience, but I do play on getting some other M42 lenses like the Jupiter-9, and I don't want to only carry the J-9 around on those days that I go M42-only - I almost regret getting this genuine adapter! All my old lenses are still K-mount (M 50 1.7, Viv 28/2.8, 135/3.5)

On the other hand, these adaptalls are looking pretty nice...

Last edited by Eruditass; 10-18-2009 at 11:45 PM.
Eruditass is offline  
10-19-2009, 11:34 AM   #7
Site Supporter
 
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 658
I've a number of m42 lenses; with an economical adapter dedicated to each lens they are functionally no different from a K mount.

I certainly wouldn't let K vs mxx be the deciding factor should you find a good m42 or m39.

Dave in Iowa
newarts is offline  
10-19-2009, 11:36 AM   #8
Loyal Member
 
Location: Laurel, MD
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 862
Well, I like to lie and wait for the exact version I want - I am in no hurry.

How hard is it to modify the adapter / lens to convert a M42 to K permanently?
Eruditass is offline  
10-19-2009, 11:59 AM   #9
Site Supporter
 
Location: Copenhagen
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 194
I got the K-mount version and was very happy until the wife discovered the Zenit Avtomat that came with it. Now the Helios resides on the Zenit in my wifes camera bag.

Well. I'll have to find another one I guess.

And: It's a stellar lens.
thomascdk is offline  
10-19-2009, 06:37 PM   #10
Pentaxian
 
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Gallery Photos: 4
Posts: 3,944
Originally Posted by deadwolfbones View Post
I have the 44M and the 44K-4 MC.

I use the 44K-4 because a) don't need to fiddle with the adapter and b) the 44M has a tiny spot of fungus and is on the DL until I get around to learning how to disassemble/clean lenses.

Really there's not much difference if any. All of the Helios-44X-X lenses perform similarly in my experience.
When you figure out how to disassemble your 44M, post the steps on how it is done. I need to re-lube the focus helix on mine and am hesitant to just tear into it without some notion of what to expect.

Steve
stevebrot is offline  
10-19-2009, 06:41 PM   #11
Pentaxian
 
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Gallery Photos: 4
Posts: 3,944
Originally Posted by Eruditass View Post
Well, I like to lie and wait for the exact version I want - I am in no hurry.

How hard is it to modify the adapter / lens to convert a M42 to K permanently?
It is not hard. You remove the metal retention spring from the adapter and notch/drill the lens base to engage the lens release pin on the camera body. Some people even also a drop of Loktite (the non-permanent type) to the threads.

Steve
stevebrot is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:17 PM.