FA* club...probably not descriptive enough. For me it's more of a fetish. Before fondling my FA*'s I dress in latex and hire a dominatrix (OK, so she volunteers to be near those beautiful lenses).
I'm one of the few who didn't like the 24/2, but I blame that on a bad copy. Also sold an FA*300/4.5 which I still regret--though the buddy I sold it to lets me play with it as long as I don't show up at his door in latex with a whip-happy companion.
Still shooting FA*28-70/2.8, FA*80-200/2.8 and FA*250-600/5.6 for zooms. And FA*200/4 Macro and FA*600/4 for primes (yes the 3 amigos too but they have no *).
I just plain love the FA* color rendition and bokeh plus their way too heavy heft is something I like a lot too as I pretty much only shoot from a tripod. So other people have gym memberships, I carry FA* lenses. The more I shoot the better shape I'm in--so I can look good in latex!
LOL
That is a mighty sweeet set of FA*'s you've got there, you have to post some images with those beauties, latex or not
Now I have both the FA*85 1.4 and the 77 Ltd. I love both lenses, but the 77 Ltd is more versatile. The 85mm was designed as a portrait lens, and at least on my copy is not great for distance shots. Portraits and close-ups.... yes yes yes, but medium/long distance the 77 wins by a mile.
Think carefully of your needs before making that swap.
Peter, I wanted to see some distant samples with the 85 prior to really finalizing it. Even the FA77/1.9 is not that great with far distant shots, like most of my other primes are, if the 85/1.4 is worse than that I will have very limited use for that...thanks for the heads up.
Trooper, I changed the tilte to F* & FA* club, as I think the F* share the optical forumla and has to belong here...thanks for posting, absolutely love those shots.
Zav, thanks for sharing images with the lovely 600/4, did you crop either of the images?
I will also like to see some animals or birds shot with that monster...
No crop on the Eiffel Tower, a little crop on the leaf picture.
This one was almost a close up for such a monster:
Background is just blurred away.
And don't get me wrong, the lens is not mine (I don't have enough money for this), it is the property of Pentax France!
Ok pcarfan, here are a few images:
--Bald Eagle with fish was shot with FA*600/4 no crop, no post process, no sharpening etc. Washington state. Shot on film and scanned.
--Elk semi-silhouette was also FA*600/4 at f. 5.6 no crop no PP. Montana
--Caterpiller was shot with FA*200/4 Macro with flash. Slight crop. Montana.
--Saguaro Silhouette shot with FA*28-70/2.8. No crop or PP. Arizona.
--Moonscape is an extraction shot of the Painted Hills in Oregon shot with FA*250-600 at f.11. Again, no crop or PP. Shot on film and scanned.