PentaxForums.com  

Go Back   PentaxForums.com > Photo Galleries > Post your photos! > Photo Critique

Photo Critique Looking for some honest critique and improvements for your photos? Post here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-27-2008, 08:07 AM   #1
mfc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: melbourne
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 143
query on composition???

its not that sharp and the fc balance is off, but what abought the comp?
Attached Images
 
mfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 08:59 AM   #2
Pentaxian
 
ftpaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 3,251
I can definitely sense something wrong with the framing.
Does this look better to you?
Attached Images
 
__________________

My Blog < See this? CLICK IT!
My Website < THIS ONE TOO!
Themes of Time
ftpaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 12:40 PM   #3
Pentaxian
 
maxwell1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Gallery Photos: 1
Posts: 1,784
I'd add (actually subtract) to that and take a little off the top too....

I also did some quick and crude sharpening with Irfanview(all I have here at work).
Attached Images
 
__________________

My Gallery

Pentax DA 35mm Limited|Pentax FA 50mm|Pentax DA 10-17mm|Pentax DA 12-24mm|Sigma EX DG 24-60mm|Pentax DA*50-135mm
maxwell1295 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 12:45 PM   #4
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NorCal
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 37
I like your original composition. the upright pillow lines up and contrasts perfectly with the background wall, creating a kind of harlequin effect. You could crop a slight bit on the right, but not too much. Yes, it violates the rule of thirds, but I think the center comp works here. The expression on your subject is great, btw.
__________________
Pentax K200D, K100D. DA 14mm f/2.8; SMC-A 300mm f/4.0; SMC-M 100mm f/4.0 Macro; SMC-A 50mm f/1.7. Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC Macro; 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro. Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II LD. Lensbaby 1.0 (The Original).. Formerly: LX, MX, ME, P3 and the good ole K1000, of course.
EstimatedEyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 03:10 PM   #5
Pentaxian
 
ftpaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Gallery Photos: 6
Posts: 3,251
I just noticed the very interesting contrast between the pillow faces and the walls.
__________________

My Blog < See this? CLICK IT!
My Website < THIS ONE TOO!
Themes of Time
ftpaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 04:52 PM   #6
mfc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: melbourne
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 143
its gotta be square :{

its hard to shoot square without any indication of where the square is going to be !! lol
ill try the bit of the right {and off the top to square it up} hmm rule of thirds?? don't work on squares lol. im facinated by 6x6 {got a twin lens} but always ,alwase got better pics out of 6x7 or croped 35mm
mfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 05:11 PM   #7
mfc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: melbourne
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 143
cropped and actualy square

croped a little{of right and top}
Attached Images
 
mfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 07:17 PM   #8
Site Supporter
 
monochrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood, MO (St. Louis area)
Gallery Photos: 5
Posts: 794
A different composition guide.



This is one of the images I see on this site that grab my attention and make me want to save it to my "Study Images" folder (which I never do without asking).

First, I like the flatness and geometry of the background - reminiscent of early impressionist painting. The balance of light and dark, with just a touch of muted color is intriguing. You're not confined by the standard width x height ratio and you use the extra real estate to advantage.

The lighting enhances the flatness of the background and draws attention to the subject, especially the eyes and textures in the t-shirt. Few portraits make me wonder what the life of this subject has been as this one does.

OK - so this is really technical composition stuff that I'm exploring right now -

Thirds (Golden Mean) isn't the only guide for subject placement - and in this case thirds doesn't work well. Golden Spiral (conch shell - Fibonacci progression) would work better if the crop was more traditional in a horizontal format - BUT

In your second square image, (after your small crop) the lines down from his hand, to near his elbow, and up through his shoulder and the pillow, form almost perfectly the 3 proportional "Golden Triangles" that contribute to pleasing composition. The angle of his face, particularly his chin, is nearly perfectly supported in the intersection of the 66% triangle. I believe your cropped composition is excellent, if non-traditional.

So, I got an 86 on that question on my Art II exam. Whatever.

I like this picture.
__________________
KX | MESuper | K10D

Last edited by monochrome; 05-27-2008 at 09:44 PM..
monochrome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 10:55 PM   #9
Site Supporter
 
Damn Brit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oakland, CA
Gallery Photos: 70
Posts: 4,325
I think it should be cropped top and bottom like a panorama.
Gary
__________________
Gary is my name.
Canadian by adoption eh.


My forum gallery pics here: http://www.pentaxforums.com/gallery/...lbum-5983.html
Damn Brit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 02:19 AM   #10
mfc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: melbourne
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 143
Originally Posted by Damn Brit View Post
I think it should be cropped top and bottom like a panorama.
Gary
yea its better rectangular but its gota be square
regarding golden sec its one comp tool ive never learnt[ill look it up]
mfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:23 PM.

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.