PentaxForums.com

Go Back PentaxForums.com > Photo Sharing and Galleries > Post your photos! > Photo Critique > Nature Rocks in Creek

Photo Critique Looking for some honest critique and improvements for your photos? Post here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
10-25-2009, 03:58 PM   #1
Site Supporter
 
Location: Billings, MT
Gallery Photos: 24
Posts: 419
Rocks in Creek
ISO: 200   Aperture: F22   Shutter Speed: 1/15s   Camera: K20D   Focal Length: 108 (?)   

Taken with a slow shutter speed to get some shimmering water over some colorful river rock. DA*50-135.

wtlwdwgn is offline  
10-25-2009, 04:18 PM   #2
Ash
Site Supporter
 
Location: Toowoomba, Australia
Gallery Photos: 100
Posts: 7,925
Good start Steve.
You may have wanted the shimmer to be smoother, in which case a slower shutter speed, like 1-2secs, may have been your intent. To get a sharp shot, you'd have to have the camera mounted on a tripod.
The colours seems to have a slight bluish hue to them, which may be reflective - and may well have needed a CP-L to eliminate that.
The subject matter is dispersed throughout the frame making the eye wonder around looking for something to hone to. Perhaps framing the shot with a few more prominent stones on the backdrop of a pleasant non-distracting scene may have helped here.
Ash is offline  
10-25-2009, 04:34 PM   #3
Site Supporter
 
Location: Billings, MT
Gallery Photos: 24
Posts: 419
Thanks Ash. I agree there is no central focal point as I was trying for an abstract mosaic type of image. The blue cast is likely from the intense blue sky. I did use a tripod. To have used a longer shutter speed I would've needed an ND or CPL filter neither of which I had with me (no excuse!).
wtlwdwgn is offline  
10-25-2009, 04:40 PM   #4
Site Supporter
 
Location: Maple Ridge BC Canada
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 5,881
I like the shot Steve for the reason you shot it with the slow shutter speed. It does add to the image. JIM
Jimbo is offline  
10-25-2009, 08:33 PM   #5
Site Supporter
 
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Gallery Photos: 10
Posts: 825
I think you've done well, Steve. I'm on the fast shutter speed side when it comes to water. The faster speed here gives more definition to the "shimmer"--a matter of personal preference, I guess. I understand your point about the mosaic but I agree with Ash--even when you're not showing anything in particular, you have to provide the eye some sort of anchor &/or frame. It can be very subtle but it has to be there. Getting a shot that does that and still has the quality of randomness you're after is hard--but very rewarding (I'm told ;~)

Last edited by dadipentak; 10-25-2009 at 08:42 PM.
dadipentak is offline  
10-25-2009, 08:56 PM   #6
Moderator
Site Supporter
 
Location: Oakland, CA
Gallery Photos: 155
Posts: 10,644
I like the transition from the bottom up, first clear, then the light shimmer and then blurred at the top. It does need a focal point to balance it though.
Damn Brit is offline  
10-26-2009, 10:21 AM   #7
Pentaxian
 
Location: Nebraska, USA
Gallery Photos: 20
Posts: 841
I like it just the way it is But then, I'm one of those oddball geologist types who think a picture of a whole bunch o' rocks is perfect all by itself without needing any particular focal point This would make a great wallpaper image on the computer.

Jim
RoxnDox is offline  
10-26-2009, 03:37 PM   #8
Site Supporter
 
Location: Billings, MT
Gallery Photos: 24
Posts: 419
Originally Posted by RoxnDox View Post
This would make a great wallpaper image on the computer.

Jim
As a matter of fact I have done just that.

Thanks for the C&C. I'll have to look at trying to include a focal point. It'll be a year before I can reshoot though after the winter and then the spring runoff.
wtlwdwgn is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:07 AM.