PentaxForums.com

Go Back PentaxForums.com > Photography > Post Processing, Printing, Software, and Darkroom > Amazing Dave Hill photo PP technique

Post Processing, Printing, Software, and Darkroom Discuss photo printing, scanning, editing, and enchancement methods here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
06-30-2009, 07:40 PM   #16
Pentaxian
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Gallery Photos: 7
Posts: 445
Originally Posted by ivoire View Post
Appreciate the question, examples and solution. Always open to new ideas/techniques
Unfortunately, no one has offered a solution how it is done. Still waiting ...

Yes, keep on learning, and growing.

Originally Posted by schmik View Post
Why be so negative... I like it and if don't then you don't have to say "it's not photography"
Agree. I don't hear people who subscribe to Leonardo Davinci's style says a Van Gogh is not a painting.

From other forums, the technique seems a love it or hate it variety, inciting strong reaction from the it-is-not-photography camp.
song_hm is offline  
06-30-2009, 07:53 PM   #17
Pentaxian
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Gallery Photos: 7
Posts: 445
Originally Posted by krypticide View Post
I really like the style. It comes across more on the "art" side than the "photograph" side (not that the two are mutually exclusive).
What is amazing is how he is able to make the image looks like a mechanically captured photograph, a hand crafted painting, and a computer generated image all at the same time.

Originally Posted by Arpe View Post
They're pretty cool, but I don't like them. They look like drawings.
I think that is the whole point - beyond click and capture.
song_hm is offline  
06-30-2009, 08:37 PM   #18
Site Supporter
 
Gallery Photos: 4
Posts: 729
Originally Posted by song_hm View Post
What is amazing is how he is able to make the image looks like a mechanically captured photograph, a hand crafted painting, and a computer generated image all at the same time.



I think that is the whole point - beyond click and capture.
Exactly...it's why I find them interesting. Is art not taking something raw and creating something interesting and maybe even new from the raw materials? Often combining materials and media of differing types, some never even used in combination before, but taking those tools and materials to create new, interesting pieces is what it is all about.

Every form has it's place...funny how closed some minds are for the unconventional non-mainstream, then again that is why we have network TV, right? Were the inability to imagine, accept and create the norm we would not have ever gone to the Moon, have autos, have computers or even the internet. Then again, who even knows if we have been to the moon or that the Earth is not flat?

Nice find and thanks for the links...something to research and see how it's done!
brecklundin is offline  
06-30-2009, 09:00 PM   #19
Loyal Member
 
Location: Abilene, TX
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 335
He starts with a lot of light. See how his subjects are just totally wrapped in the stuff with an emphasis on the rim and hair lights. I read in an interview once that he routinely uses 8 or more lights on each subject. Once you've got that part down bring up the fill, contrast, clarity and brightness sliders in Adobe Camera Raw then back off the brightness and saturation sliders to taste. The reason the Dave Hill look is so hard to re-create is that he does most of it with his camera and strobes, not his software.

Edit: Oh yea, the other thing I see most Dave Hill emulators missing is the story. Check out the storytelling! That is what really makes Dave Hill so popular (and wealthy). The guy can tell a story and he knows how to get the most out the talented and expressive subjects he uses to do it! If a photographer is unable to study Dave Hill and come away enriched he's got a lot more to learn than a simple post processing technique.

Last edited by GoldenWreckedAngle; 06-30-2009 at 09:10 PM.
GoldenWreckedAngle is offline  
06-30-2009, 09:22 PM   #20
Site Supporter
 
Location: NYC
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 800
well I can tel you that every Dave hill project is a production... there is a lot of matte painting involve and a lot of work... and I will not be surprised if he is not doing his own PP
the photograph is just the skeleton.. I like it for what it is .
to get this look you also need a great stylist, lighter, and at least three photoshop artist one of them with good drawing skills
redpigeons is offline  
07-01-2009, 08:00 AM   #21
wll
Pentaxian
 
Location: Mission Hills, CA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 498
This guy does some great stuff IMHO, he is quite a talent.


wll
wll is offline  
07-01-2009, 08:34 AM   #22
Loyal Member
 
Location: Abilene, TX
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 335
Redpigeons is right on. A Dave Hill set looks more like a movie production than a still shoot and really, his technique is probably better learned by studying videography than photography. Another shooter that might interest photographers that like the Dave Hill style is Tim Tadder, AKA: The Visual Pimp. There's not quite as much storyline in his images but they are a visual treat... all-be-it a treat that will not agree with everyone's preferred aesthetic flavor.
GoldenWreckedAngle is offline  
07-01-2009, 09:01 AM   #23
Loyal Member
 
Location: California
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 478
Originally Posted by Arpe View Post
They're pretty cool, but I don't like them. They look like drawings.
Does that mean that you don't like drawings?

They don't look like drawings to me - just a different kind of art. To me there is only good art and bad art. The tools to create the art are irrelevant unless you are trying to copy it.
kunik is offline  
07-01-2009, 03:58 PM   #24
Pentaxian
 
Location: Erial, NJ USA
Gallery Photos: 13
Posts: 1,053
I don't think anybody ever said it wasn't art. And once again, God forbid one be a naysayer around here.
Jodokast96 is offline  
07-01-2009, 04:58 PM   #25
Member
 
Location: Berkeley, CA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 83
Aren't most of Dave Hill's "photographs" actually photomontage?
jacksonpritt is offline  
07-01-2009, 06:12 PM   #26
Pentaxian
 
Location: New Zealand
Gallery Photos: 13
Posts: 2,716
Originally Posted by kunik View Post
Does that mean that you don't like drawings?

They don't look like drawings to me - just a different kind of art. To me there is only good art and bad art. The tools to create the art are irrelevant unless you are trying to copy it.
I only like drawings if they look like photos!!
Arpe is offline  
07-01-2009, 09:08 PM   #27
Site Supporter
 
Location: Montreal (Canada)
Gallery Photos: 14
Posts: 145
Have you checked the behind the scenes section?

090417 Adventure Girl - Behind the Scenes on Vimeo

it ain't easy achieving those results...
soalle is offline  
07-02-2009, 12:41 PM   #28
Loyal Member
 
Location: Abilene, TX
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 335
Originally Posted by Jodokast96 View Post
I don't think anybody ever said it wasn't art. And once again, God forbid one be a naysayer around here.
Nay.......
GoldenWreckedAngle is offline  
07-02-2009, 01:06 PM   #29
Pentaxian
 
Location: Ottawa, ON - Canada
Gallery Photos: 2
Posts: 553
The F STOP Professional Photographers Discuss Their Craft Uncategorized

that photo blog is great for studying and reproducing this kind of high end work. compositing is a career of it's own, so you need the right software for quality results.
attack11 is offline  
07-02-2009, 01:59 PM   #30
Loyal Member
 
Location: Abilene, TX
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 335
Originally Posted by attack11 View Post
The F STOP Professional Photographers Discuss Their Craft Uncategorized

that photo blog is great for studying and reproducing this kind of high end work. compositing is a career of it's own, so you need the right software for quality results.
Hey, thanks. I hadn't seen that resource before. Looks like several of the top players are posting there.
GoldenWreckedAngle is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:43 AM.