I really like the style. It comes across more on the "art" side than the "photograph" side (not that the two are mutually exclusive).
What is amazing is how he is able to make the image looks like a mechanically captured photograph, a hand crafted painting, and a computer generated image all at the same time.
Originally Posted by Arpe
They're pretty cool, but I don't like them. They look like drawings.
I think that is the whole point - beyond click and capture.
What is amazing is how he is able to make the image looks like a mechanically captured photograph, a hand crafted painting, and a computer generated image all at the same time.
I think that is the whole point - beyond click and capture.
Exactly...it's why I find them interesting. Is art not taking something raw and creating something interesting and maybe even new from the raw materials? Often combining materials and media of differing types, some never even used in combination before, but taking those tools and materials to create new, interesting pieces is what it is all about.
Every form has it's place...funny how closed some minds are for the unconventional non-mainstream, then again that is why we have network TV, right? Were the inability to imagine, accept and create the norm we would not have ever gone to the Moon, have autos, have computers or even the internet. Then again, who even knows if we have been to the moon or that the Earth is not flat?
Nice find and thanks for the links...something to research and see how it's done!
He starts with a lot of light. See how his subjects are just totally wrapped in the stuff with an emphasis on the rim and hair lights. I read in an interview once that he routinely uses 8 or more lights on each subject. Once you've got that part down bring up the fill, contrast, clarity and brightness sliders in Adobe Camera Raw then back off the brightness and saturation sliders to taste. The reason the Dave Hill look is so hard to re-create is that he does most of it with his camera and strobes, not his software.
Edit: Oh yea, the other thing I see most Dave Hill emulators missing is the story. Check out the storytelling! That is what really makes Dave Hill so popular (and wealthy). The guy can tell a story and he knows how to get the most out the talented and expressive subjects he uses to do it! If a photographer is unable to study Dave Hill and come away enriched he's got a lot more to learn than a simple post processing technique.
Last edited by GoldenWreckedAngle; 06-30-2009 at 09:10 PM.
well I can tel you that every Dave hill project is a production... there is a lot of matte painting involve and a lot of work... and I will not be surprised if he is not doing his own PP
the photograph is just the skeleton.. I like it for what it is .
to get this look you also need a great stylist, lighter, and at least three photoshop artist one of them with good drawing skills
Redpigeons is right on. A Dave Hill set looks more like a movie production than a still shoot and really, his technique is probably better learned by studying videography than photography. Another shooter that might interest photographers that like the Dave Hill style is Tim Tadder, AKA: The Visual Pimp. There's not quite as much storyline in his images but they are a visual treat... all-be-it a treat that will not agree with everyone's preferred aesthetic flavor.
They're pretty cool, but I don't like them. They look like drawings.
Does that mean that you don't like drawings?
They don't look like drawings to me - just a different kind of art. To me there is only good art and bad art. The tools to create the art are irrelevant unless you are trying to copy it.
They don't look like drawings to me - just a different kind of art. To me there is only good art and bad art. The tools to create the art are irrelevant unless you are trying to copy it.
that photo blog is great for studying and reproducing this kind of high end work. compositing is a career of it's own, so you need the right software for quality results.
that photo blog is great for studying and reproducing this kind of high end work. compositing is a career of it's own, so you need the right software for quality results.
Hey, thanks. I hadn't seen that resource before. Looks like several of the top players are posting there.