Originally Posted by Bramela
If a photo size is reduced say from 3037 X 2033 to 800 X 536 pixels , does this permanently alter the resolution of the photo.
"Resolution" has two different meanings in with respect to digital image.
One is, total number of pixels, as in whether a camera is 6MP or 10MP or 14MP. In this case, resolution is simply width * height. 3037 * 2033 = 6,xxx,xxx = 6MP. So you are starting with a "resolution" of 6MP. You are ending with a "resolution" of 800 * 536, or about 0.5MP. Yes, you've greatly reduced the resolution - there are simply fewer pixels.
The other definition of resolution is the number of pixels per inch (ppi). This has meaning only if you have a specific print size in mind. And it literally is number of pixels divided by size in inches. The 3000x2000 image (rounding for convenience) image is 100ppi if you print at 30"x20", for example, because 3000 / 30 = 100 and 2000 / 20 = 100. Similarly, it's 200ppi if you print at 15"x10". The 800x536 image would be 100ppi at 8"x5.36", or 200ppi at 4"x2.68". So yes, by reducing the number of pixels, you've reduced the resolution in this sense too, in that for any given print size, you will have fewer ppi.
If the picture is taken at say 10 megapixels, does the size reduction adversely effect the resolution if the photo is enlarged in printing.
I always thought that reducing the file size does not adversely effect the printing quality as the megapixels remain the same???
No. You might have started with 6 million pixels, but if you reduce to 800x536, you're left with only around half a million. Thus, at any given print size, you've got *way* less resolution in ppi.