PentaxForums.com

Go Back PentaxForums.com > Photography > Post Processing, Printing, Software, and Darkroom > Fixing a negative

Post Processing, Printing, Software, and Darkroom Discuss photo printing, scanning, editing, and enchancement methods here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
10-14-2009, 01:37 PM   #1
Member
 
Location: Salem, MA / New York City, NY
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 55
Fixing a negative

I recently got some more film developed and scanned. I don't really know how this shot got so much exposure in bands, but I'm wondering if there's a way to photoshop some of the over exposure out. The color in the unaffected bits is so pretty, I'd love to see it corrected. Thoughts? Btw, posted image is scaled down, not full size
Attached Images
 
jzietman is online now  
10-14-2009, 01:39 PM   #2
Pentaxian
 
Location: NJ USA
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 2,750
you might try correcting color in the red areas, using a mask to keep from screwing up the good bits
Nesster is online now  
10-14-2009, 02:38 PM   #3
Member
 
Location: Salem, MA / New York City, NY
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 55
Any tips on the mask part of that? I've never used one before.
jzietman is online now  
10-14-2009, 02:38 PM   #4
Pentaxian
 
Location: Florida, Communist States of America
Gallery Photos: 12
Posts: 4,521
Looks more like a problem before or after the shot. Light leak maybe. Or a problem in processing.
graphicgr8s is offline  
10-14-2009, 02:40 PM   #5
Pentaxian
 
Location: Florida, Communist States of America
Gallery Photos: 12
Posts: 4,521
Originally Posted by jzietman View Post
Any tips on the mask part of that? I've never used one before.
If using PS you create an adjustment layer and make your corrections so that the bad areas look good and match what use to be the good area. Then on the mask itself paint with black to hide the effect from the good area. It's totally none destructive and if you err you go back and paint with white. In fact you can use selection tools on the mask and fill with white or black depending on whether you want to hide or show the effect. You can also use shades of gray to vary the intensity of the effect.

Last edited by graphicgr8s; 10-14-2009 at 02:48 PM.
graphicgr8s is offline  
10-14-2009, 05:17 PM   #6
Site Supporter
 
Location: Okc
Gallery Photos: 2
Posts: 124
It looks likes "light leak" while loading the film in the processor.
ramair455 is online now  
10-14-2009, 05:20 PM   #7
Member
 
Location: Salem, MA / New York City, NY
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by ramair455 View Post
It looks likes "light leak" while loading the film in the processor.
Meaning the lab did it? Even more reason to stop shooting color and go back to black and white that I can develop myself...
jzietman is online now  
10-14-2009, 06:07 PM   #8
Site Supporter
 
Location: The wheatfields of Canada
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted by ramair455 View Post
It looks likes "light leak" while loading the film in the processor.
Originally Posted by jzietman View Post
Meaning the lab did it? Even more reason to stop shooting color and go back to black and white that I can develop myself...
It also looks like a film that was loaded, unloaded or otherwise handled in direct sunlight. This really is most likely caused by the user, not the lab.
Wheatfield is online now  
10-14-2009, 06:32 PM   #9
Pentaxian
 
Location: Florida, Communist States of America
Gallery Photos: 12
Posts: 4,521
Originally Posted by Wheatfield View Post
It also looks like a film that was loaded, unloaded or otherwise handled in direct sunlight. This really is most likely caused by the user, not the lab.
I wouldn't rule the lab out just yet. How was the rest of the roll? What position on the roll is this shot? Beginning? End? Too hard to tell with available information.
graphicgr8s is offline  
10-14-2009, 06:43 PM   #10
Site Supporter
 
Location: Okc
Gallery Photos: 2
Posts: 124
Do you bulk load your own film?
Is this fogging in the start or end of the film, or in the middle?
Are some frames worse than the one you posted?

It could be you; it could be user of the processor. I ran a lab for sometime and saw then fogging on bulk loaded film (cheap canisters) or careless loading of the C-41 film processor.

It you accidently opened the film back in sunlight, the fogging would be much worse. You would have several frames trashed from exposure.
ramair455 is online now  
10-14-2009, 07:16 PM   #11
Member
 
Location: Salem, MA / New York City, NY
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 55
Hmm, in that case it might have been me. I'm pretty sure this was from the beginning of the roll. I usually try to load in the shade when I'm outside, maybe I forgot that time. Sad. Thanks for letting me know though, I know not to do it again!
jzietman is online now  
10-14-2009, 07:43 PM   #12
Site Supporter
 
Location: Okc
Gallery Photos: 2
Posts: 124
Originally Posted by jzietman View Post
Hmm, in that case it might have been me. I'm pretty sure this was from the beginning of the roll. I usually try to load in the shade when I'm outside, maybe I forgot that time. Sad. Thanks for letting me know though, I know not to do it again!
Not so quick, if it was at the beginning, it could also be the lab. Unless you do not know how to load the leader on the take-up spool correctly. I have loaded hundreds of rolls of film in direct light and open shade with out problems.

be careful with loading and be discriminating with labs; they never want to claim responsibility for botched film.
ramair455 is online now  
10-14-2009, 08:45 PM   #13
Member
 
Location: Salem, MA / New York City, NY
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 55
Ok, I just pulled out the negatives. This was the second exposed negative, and the first had even worse over-exposure in a similar pattern. The third frame also has the same thing going on, but it's more spread over the image. After that, all the frames are fine, except there are some signs of this same overexposure around the bracket holes on top and bottom of the negatives for at least ten more frames into the roll, decreasing with frequency over time.

Thoughts?
jzietman is online now  
10-14-2009, 09:01 PM   #14
Pentaxian
 
Location: Melb. Aust
Gallery Photos: 0
Posts: 487
sounds more like an opened back, or processing machine (while the film is still rolled up). Why I say that is the film on the outer layers is more effected than the inner layers. A light leak would probably effect the whole roll (not always... I once had a M645 camera that had a light leak that only leaked enough light in direct sunlight to effect the film).
HGMonaro is offline  
10-14-2009, 10:08 PM   #15
Pentaxian
 
Location: Florida, Communist States of America
Gallery Photos: 12
Posts: 4,521
I'd almost wonder if the seals aren't going south on you. They leak in different areas depending on how the camera is held and pressure put on the back. What camera? Is it fresh film? Try running another roll or two thru it and take a look. That should confirm where the problem is. Use a different lab for each roll.
graphicgr8s is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:03 PM.