Well after much waffling between the DA* and trying to get/wait for a Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8, I broke down and bought the DA*. I couldn't be more happier. The lens is built great, easy to handle, not too big, and of course has great image quality. The (almost) silent focusing is a nice bonus.
Bought it from a local camera shop during my lunch break yesterday and gave it a workout at the park on my way home.
Full album is here
I love that lens myself and it's a stellar performer as you've proven with these images here. I couldn't be happier, but still people try to make this lens look inferior to previous Pentax lenses, but in fact I'm still going to say it's better. Until you see the resolving capabilities of this lens yourself, you're never gong to be satisfied.
Thanks for sharing these pictures and you're one of the lucky one!
BTW, if LBA strikes again the DA*16-50 is also great!
Thanks for looking! I'd love to get the 16-50mm, but not sure it's in the budget (yet). I have my 10-20mm for the wide and my Tamron 28-75mm for the "normal" so I think I'm good to go for now.
On 4, it's between the head stones on the tree bark.. It doesn't match the rest of the out of focus scene..
On 6, it's just a matter of it being more hashed-like than smooth.
On 7, the top right of the scene shows some of this hashed-like not smooth bokeh as well.
Now, don't misinterpret what I'm saying. I like the photos but, I have seen this type of bokeh before and, I in particular don't like it. It's not very smooth in my opinion. That's all.
Glad to see that you are happy with this selection over the other one. I think you made the right choice for your style of photogrpahy now that I have a clearer understanding of your shooting style.
With respect to the comments on the bokeh of some shots. I don't have a problem with the bokeh'd images stated. I didn't EXIF them but I would assume that they were stopped down to 5.6 or 8. Once you get to those aps there is never going to be creamy or buttery OOF areas.