Error Typo/metric error in lens review...

[Ratmagiclady]

Just thought I'd put up that on the Sigma 28-105 2.8-4 lens review (for some reason the listing is repeated, as well) I noticed the metric length measurement doesn't add up to the English. (I suspect the metric's the correct one, but I can measure when my copy arrives: I noticed cause I was wondering if it'd fit in something. )

This is one of the two.
PentaxForums.com Third-Party Pentax Lens Review Database - 28-105 F2.8-4.0

[Adam]

I've removed the metric measurements.

[res3567]

Originally Posted by Ratmagiclady

Just thought I'd put up that on the Sigma 28-105 2.8-4 lens review (for some reason the listing is repeated, as well) I noticed the metric length measurement doesn't add up to the English. (I suspect the metric's the correct one, but I can measure when my copy arrives: I noticed cause I was wondering if it'd fit in something. )

This is one of the two.
PentaxForums.com Third-Party Pentax Lens Review Database - 28-105 F2.8-4.0

The repeated lising was my fault RML. I was new to the forum and I did not do something right; hence the second posting. As far as the metric........ I dunno.... I more or less repeated the specs from another source.......... I will delete the second post..... Adam has to show me how or he can do it himself.......

[Adam]

You can't delete lenses, but you can edit them.

Let me know which of the two to delete, then link me, and I'll take care of it!

[res3567]

Here is the link.

PentaxForums.com Third-Party Pentax Lens Review Database - 28-105mm F2.8-4.0

[Adam]

The lens has been removed.

[Ratmagiclady]

OK, mine just arrived a little bit ago, it looks like 3.1 inches/81mm would be the correct measurement.

Looks to be a pretty nice lens, too, as nearly as I can tell from firing around at a few apertures. At least compared to expectations.

[Adam]

Res should be able to edit the entry and add the correct measurements once they are confirmed; please use the PM system for this purpose.