The differences are subtle, this one's got deeper tone and more contrast. I'm not sure it is an improvement over your first attempt. I like the photo very much for all the transformation of liquid and light.

__________________

Pentax print ads -camera photos -Print Photographica
Pentax: SP, ES II, KX, Program Plus, ZX-10, ZX-L, K100D, Takumar: Super, S-M-C 3.5/28mm; S-M-C 3.5/35mm; Super, SMC 1.4/50; Auto, S-M-C 1.8/55mm, S-M-C 2.8/105mm, Tele 5.6/200mm K-mount: SMC-A 2.8/28mm, SMC-M 1.7/50mm, 1.9/43 and 2.4/70 Limited, FA 28-90mm, DA 4/16-45

I agree with Nesster here. I am learning that a subtle change in settings can completely change the feel of the B&W photos. Especially one like this where there is flowing water. I am torn as to which one I like most, the first softer more flowing feel or the second with more contrast and detail. I think I lean towards the Reconverted. But Hanging on a pastel wall the first would win.
This is why I do not leave comments very often. I am just not qualified.....
Thanks for the link to Gregs conversion info.

__________________
gus

Get what makes you happy...
Anything less, makes you less happy!

The conversion steps do indeed add detail. As others mentioned I think the improvements are very subtle in this shot. I think I like this version better just with the differnces in the flood lights under the water.

__________________
==== DAVE ====
K20D / istD and a bunch of glass
I plan on living forever. So far, so good

Themes of Time