| Author: | | New Member Registered: August, 2022 Posts: 1 | | Review Date: August 31, 2022 | Not Recommended | Price: $40.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | Better than Quantary | | Cons: | Soft compared to primes even at f8 through f22 | | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 9
Value: 8
Camera Used: KS-1
| |
I am getting ready to go on a trip and was reviewing the different zoom lens reviews in an effort to just bring 2 lenses, a 35mm prime and a zoom. Based on the stellar reviews here I purchased the Tamron Adaptall 60-300. I did some testing of this lens between F5.6 and F22 to compare sharpness and aberration to the lenses I had in the 200mm range. The test subject was a distant brick building on a bright sunny day. All test pictures were taken using a tripod and 2 second delay. This lens was noticeably softer compared to my Takumar 200mm f3.5, Nikon 200mm F4, Nikon 180mm F2.8, Pentax 6x7 200mm with adapter and even the Pentax-m 135mm zoomed in to where the image was the same size on the screen.
So, if you need an affordable zoom and don't need to crop, this lens probably will be okay. Also, when reading user reviews bear in mind that their review may be looking through rose colored filters.The current plan is to sell this lens and take the Takumar 200mm F3.5 on vacation.
| | | | | | | Junior Member Registered: February, 2009 Location: Ireland Posts: 31 | | Review Date: August 3, 2021 | Recommended | Price: $10.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | Sharp, cheap, adaptable | | Cons: | Weight. | | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 9
Value: 10
Camera Used: Pentax K20D
| |
About a decade ago I bought one of these and was given another. Both were lightly afflicted by fungus but still gave good results. On examining them closer I realised that stripping and cleaning them was likely to just cause frustration, so I left them as-is.
Recently I spotted another on the bay of E and lobbed in a last-second snipe.
Ten bucks.
I was gob-smacked. The shipping and getting stung a little bit for duty pee'd me off a bit, but it was still a decent price overall.
The best bits?
The lens is spotlessly clean, and came with a decent Hoya UV filter, a hood, a case and a PK/A adapter. Oh, and another cheapy UV filter.
Not sure what to do with the first two. I think one of them might serve well as a slide copier.
I'll upload some pics when I get around to it, but I doubt I'll improve on any of the pics taken by this lens that have been put up already.
| | | | | New Member Registered: November, 2013 Posts: 14
1 user found this helpful
| | Review Date: October 8, 2019 | Recommended | Price: $150.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | very sharp lens | | Cons: | very few CA's | | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 9
Value: 10
Camera Used: k-5 k-s1 k-x k200d / x-e1 x-t100
| |
++ excellent sharp lens - much more better than the modern plastic zooms 
++ very high resolution over the full zoom range
++ nice colors
++ high contrast and scarecely flare
full recommendation highly recommended
******** why for not still today produced ? ********
PS. much more better corrected than the 5.6/300 single lens of Tamron.
| | | | | New Member Registered: January, 2017 Posts: 1
2 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: January 8, 2018 | Recommended | Price: $50.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Insane nice build - Quality | | Cons: | Heavy, and prone to PF | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 10
Camera Used: Canon EOS 70D
| |
Hi all,
I am a photographer from Albertslund, Copenhagen Denmark, who enjoy using long lenses on my Canon 70D DSLR. And one of my most cherished lenses is the Tamron 60-300 SP Adaptall2 lens. It is almost as good as the old Canon 70-210mm f4, that I had for some years, but sold again, as it was a massive money-binder on the shelf. So I decided after having read about this Tamron lens (23A), that it was a good choice for my portrait and astro-photo work.
And boy have I been impressed. For some 50$US I found a copy from Canada, that I bought. And it is rare that I miss AF, as I have always loved the slide-action zoom and turn-action focus like these old glass feature. I love it.
In my astro-work I can get an uncropped image with the Orion-nebula, because the lens on my cropped camera (1.6) shifts to a focal length of 90-480mm. So I get close to the subject. And it handles astro work fine.
But when there is more light - the lens comes into a whole other league. Stopped down to f8, the lens will show no PF or other abberations and just deliver pin-sharp results. I bought an electric adapter for my EOS, so that I get the EXIF info into the photos, and can get focus-beep to confirm focus. This way the lens is on par on the best lenses today - if you can live without AF.
I actually bought 2 of these gems, but sold one, as it seems like a really durable lens. The buyer that bought the other one, had just been to Greenland shooting, and he had lost his Tamron 60-300 SP Adaptall, and he ranted about it and we agreed that it was an amazing lens. So straight when he got back home from Greenland - he found my add in the used gear website, and came and bought my second lens. This lens is truly amazing.
Brilliant buy!
| | | | | | | New Member Registered: June, 2015 Location: Sheffield, Yorkshire Posts: 24
2 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: July 3, 2016 | Recommended | Price: $44.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | Sharp. Excellent all rounder. | | Cons: | Some fringing wide open. | | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: K3ii
| |
This was my first adaptall lens and I have to say i was very please at the results for a lens that only cost $44. The lack of auto focus is not a hindrance at all after a bit of practice and with the focus indicator. In fact I love this lens so much now I had to write a review.
It is very sharp, easy to handle and produces excellent images. This lens goes with me everywhere now with my smc-m 1.4 or smc-a 1.7 in my pocket.
I got mine in absolute mint condition, even the case was in mint condition. No problems whatsoever getting it in and out of macro mode.
These lenses can be picked up for a real bargain, so if you see one grab it straight away, you really won't regret it.
Below are some images. Some have been edited in Photoshop, some are more or less straight from the lens.
 | | | | | Veteran Member Registered: January, 2011 Location: Houston, Texas Posts: 982
3 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: August 1, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $40.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Great all-around, extended-range zoom, excellent at 300mm, great macro. | | Cons: | macro is soft in corners, a little heavy. | |
I'm writing this review because I'll wager I've been using this lens longer than anyone else here. I bought my first copy new from a New York discount house for something like $280 back in 1985. That was quite a bit to pay for a 3rd party zoom back in those days. I was a hard-core Canon FD user back then, and I recall giving the Canon FD 100-300mm f/5.6 a pass because of a lukewarm review I read and I gave the 50-300 L and 85-300 passes because I couldn't afford them. I must have read a good review on the Tamron somewhere because I recall having my sights set on it for at least a couple of months before I bought it.
I've often wondered why Tamron has listed the 23A's aperture values as f/3.8-5.4. I mean, why not just call it an f/4-5.6? I guess those two tenths meant a lot to Tamron's engineers, and who knows, maybe the yahoos in marketing thought it might be good for a few extra sales. As if it needed the help, already being a great lens.
I used my 23A extensively as one of a pair of "walking around" lenses (the other was a Vivitar Series 1 28-90mm f/2..8-3.5, another excellent optic) back in my film heyday, plus I put it to frequent use at air shows and auto races. Its zoom range was great for these subjects because often 300mm is just right, but sometimes it's a bit too much, which makes its zoom action so handy. These days, when I'm out shooting digitally and I don't feel like lugging around my Tamron 60B SP 300mm f/2.8 LDIF around, the 23A is often on my short list of zooms to take. I have several excellent zooms that include 300mm in their focal range nowadays, but I guess the reason why I often reach for the 23A is because I'm familiar with it. Plus, it has that fantastic macro mode, which none of my other zooms that include 300mm can match.
Back in about 2009 I was browsing at my local camera shop and spotted a 23A sitting in a miscellaneous gear area. They were asking $20 for it. Sold! I'd sold my original copy some years before for reasons I'm still not quite sure of and decided right there to rectify my error. It wasn't more than a few months later that I came across an auction on eBay for a Canon AE-1 with a Tamron 23A attached for not much more than the price of a body cap, so I won that auction for about $40. Told myself I'd picked up a nice lens with a decent little camera as a rear cap, then I sold the AE-1 on eBay for about $40, so I ended up getting my second Tamron 23A for the price of postage. I guess I was thinking about reselling the lens as well, since I had two of them and all, but I just never got around to it, still don't have much of a desire to sell it -- maybe I'll just keep the second lens for spares, I tell myself.
This lens has always been an impressively sharp optic, providing me with many sharp slides back in the day, and some great digital images in more recent years. But one of the most impressive aspects of this lens is its macro capability. At a ratio of 1:1.55, its macro magnification outdoes most macro lenses, a virtually unheard of achievement for a zoom lens.
Back in 2011, I conducted a comparison of three macro lenses: a Tamron 52B SP 90mm f/2.5 macro, a 55mm f/3.5 Nikon pre-AI Micro-Nikkor, and a Vivitar Series 1 100mm f/2.8 macro (aka the "legendary" Kiron 105mm f/2.8 macro). And, just for grins, but mostly because of its macro ratio, I decided to include the Tamron 23A. I wrote an article about this comparison at my blog and included images demonstrating the results. My conclusions regarding the Tamron 23A might interest, perhaps even surprise you:
http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/?p=56
Following are some sample images I've taken with this lens.
This one was published in a book about green iguanas. Canon F-1, Tamron 60-300, Fujichrome 100. Circa 1986.
A Porsche-powered March 83G at the 1986 IMSA race, Rivirside, California. This car was travelling at about 200mph when I captured the shot, and no, this is not a cropped photo. It's a lucky shot is what it was, and it demonstrates the value of panning with a high-speed subject. Canon F-1, Tamron 60-300, Kodachrome 64.
An F/A-18 on a wingtip, vapor puffs coming up off the wings as it pulls a high-g turn. Canon F-1, Tamron 60-300, Fujichrome 100.
Telescope on a pier, Kemah, Texas. Canon F-1, Tamron 60-300, Kodak Elite Chrome 100.
Townhomes, Last Roll of Kodachrome, Canon F-1, Tamron 60-300, Kodachrome 64
 | | | | | Site Supporter Registered: May, 2015 Location: Hampshire Posts: 892 | | Review Date: July 21, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $45.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Adaptall mount, macro capability | | Cons: | Heavy lens, push pull macro. | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 10
Camera Used: K-5
| |
I won this on Ebay at a lower price than the $45 value I put on it but P&P from Sweden added a lot to the cost. It came with a mint case but no hood or adaptall mount.
Apart from some dust inside the lens which does not seem to affect the images (but might slightly affect the viewfinder) it seems to be in good condition for it's age. I could have purchased a P/K mount with it for $15 but it came with a clear plastic adaptall cap so I elected to use a mount I had already. It is a P/K-A adaptall mount, it works on both this lens and the four other adaptall lenses I own, apparently not a 100% event with this adaptall and much easier to use than stop down metering, knowing the aperture of an image from the exif data is a bonus. (Albeit the K-5 shows F4 in the data when wide open, F3.8 on the lens).
The entry into macro mode on this copy is no problem, the push pull movement within macro is a little annoying to me but not too much of a problem, just that I find using the focussing ring method on my Helios 85-210mm F3.8 Macro easier to use.
IQ wise I have compared this to my SIGMA AF 100-300mm F4.5-6.7 DL, my LD DI TAMRON (AF) 70-300mm F:4.5-5.6 TELEMACRO A17 and my Prime Vivitar 300mm TX mount F5.6 and been delighted by the extra sharpness over the modern(ish) AF Tamron, the not quite so modern AF Sigma and the versatility of the 60-300mm range and macro over the Vivitar with no apparent reduction in image quality at 300mm. This is some lens! I have not tested it against these lenses in any way that might be construed as definitive, just looked at the images it produces and formed an opinion.
The lens is heavy, but carrying it on the camera with a neck strap for any length of time can obviously be alleviated by holding the lens up with a hand.
Purple fringing can be seen wide open, but much less of a problem than the AF Tamron, Sigma and Vivitar. Apart from the lack of AF I would rate this lens maybe slightly better than the Canon EF 70-300 F4-5.6 IS USM that I used on a Canon 10D (both bought when I was vacillating between Canon and Pentax and thought that 6 megapixels were enough) but never used it on a camera as good as the K-5 so maybe it is not. It doesn't matter though, the lens was sold to put towards a K-5 body and didn't lose me any money. If I do eventually get a modern AF lens that equals or betters this Tamron, I might keep this anyway....it is good and at this price, should maybe even be considered exceptional!
| | | | | New Member Registered: March, 2014 Posts: 2 | | Review Date: April 4, 2015 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Sharp, decent contrast, usable macro | | Cons: | Bulky, some fringing | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 6
Value: 9
Camera Used: K5
| |
Picked it up on "the" auction site.
Great Sharpness even without a hood. I love the Macro mode. It appears to be sharper than my Tokina Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm on the whole zoom range.
These photos were taken in macro mode, handheld. What you see is straight from the camera, no post processing. Dragonfly was very cooperative...
 | | | | | Veteran Member Registered: March, 2007 Location: So Cal Posts: 2,080 | | Review Date: September 20, 2014 | Recommended | Price: $40.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | sharper than expected at 300mm | | Cons: | heavy, bad zoom creep | | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 5
Bokeh: 7
Handling: 5
Value: 7
Camera Used: k10d, 36mp Sony a7R full frame
| |
newer zooms are supposed to have better technology, but with many complaints about quality control, you might want to take a look at the old glass.
here is what this lens looks like at the 300mm full zoom focal length:
Tamron SP 60-300mm(23A) zoom, surfing photos at the Wedge
i would rate this lens as a pleasant surprise; focusing it was much easier with the sony a7r evf, over the old k10d prism viewfinder.
EDIT: added more photos, with links, cross posted to the adaptall-2 forum here.
36mp sony a7r and tamron sp adaptall-2 60-300mm... this was difficult to shoot, because the target area was maybe 75x100 yards or more... i couldn't quite get the focus peaking dialed in, so i reverted to the usual zone focusing attempts, using the evf magnification to set the zone area... i shot it waaay too loose, which threw away a bunch of resolution.
main point here is that this old glass delivers pretty well, if you can hit the focus point... even cropped at over 50% it's still clean... i linked the original out of camera jpeg, if anyone wants to see it.
 Turbocharged sand rail by DragRacingTV.com, on Flickr
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5u36sxm2aauxd94/DSC02956.JPG?dl=0
Offroad sand rails, quads, and motorcycles at the Glamis drags | Sand Duning TV | | | | | Junior Member Registered: August, 2009 Location: Lexington, KY Posts: 30 | | Review Date: September 18, 2012 | Recommended | Price: $50.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Sharp, versatile 5X zoom | | Cons: | Hard-to-enter macro mode, big and heavy | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 8
Value: 8
| |
I recently got an SP 90mm and was so impressed with it that I sought-out another SP -- this one, for $50 including an Adaptall-2 mount adapter and shipping. Note that the Adaptall-2 adapters usually run around $20 by themselves, so the lens was arguably more like $30 shipped.
This lens has a very good reputation -- and it deserves it. Normally, 5X zooms sacrifice IQ to get such a range. For that matter, any zoom going to 300mm is usually soft when you get there. This one isn't. In fact, IQ is on a par with many primes in its focal range. It even has a relatively bright maximum aperture and nice bokeh. Here's a simple example shot around wide open (although it doesn't show much bokeh):
So, what's not so good?
Originally, I said there is definitely some glow wide open, but even that's fairly pleasant. After having used this lens quite a bit, I can say that under certain circumstances it has more glow than any other lens I've tried -- and I've dropped the aberrations score to 8 because of this. It also can have PF issues, although the PF I saw was more blue than purple. Not a big deal.
Build isn't great. It is very solid, heavy, and smooth, but it also has a zoom/focus ring that is too loose and a macro mode that is impossible to get into. At least I've not yet gotten mine into macro mode, and a little surfing the WWW shows I'm far from being alone in that, although I will keep trying. Macro mode is supposed to be a real macro mode and quite good, but is unfortunately only at 60mm.
The Tamron SP 2X converter is supposed to work relatively well with the 90mm and with this. No. It "works," but contrast and sharpness drop; basically, I think cropping would do better. Honestly, with a 5X zoom, a 2X converter doesn't even feel like that much more reach anyway.
Overall, it is at least competitive with modern 75-300mm lenses, especially in IQ. Various zooms that stop at 200mm or so can outperform this, but there's a big difference between 200mm and 300mm. So, if you need zoom to 300mm, like manual focus, and have good upper body strength, you'll like this lens. The only disclaimer needed is that brand new autofocus 75-300mm lenses start at around $150, so I think the price should not be much higher than $75 for this.
Update, Jan. 19, 2013: I got a message from marcusBMG suggesting that peeling-back the rubber grip and tweaking the focus coupling (which is coupled via a piece of tape) might allow the lens to enter macro mode... well, with a bit of playing, it does. Macro mode is truly awesome. However, I also found that tweaking things so that I can enter macro mode makes it miss infinity focus at the wide setting (only focus to about 25 feet), despite being able to focus past infinity at 300mm. There are a bunch of screws near the tape, and I'd bet that adjusting them can fix everything -- it's probably just some slip on these set screws -- but I'm leaving well enough alone for now....
| | | | | Pentaxian Registered: April, 2011 Location: Lost in translation ... Posts: 18,076 | | Review Date: February 16, 2012 | Recommended | Price: $20.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Overall IQ, close focus, build | | Cons: | Obviously heavy, zoom creep | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 10
| |
Bonjour,
I was in the States over the X-mas holiday passing through Houston when I happened upon Houston Camera Exchange. It was the after X-mas sales period and in the "bargain" bin (-50%) I found this lens. Didn't hesitate a millisecond and snapped it up for less than $22.00 (including sales tax) ... no Adaptall-2 mount nor hood included ... and a small piece of inner debris with the usual dust. No biggie here ... What a steal!
All the previous reviews are pretty much spot on, and I have had similar results testing indoors mostly ... more to come when the weather warms up and brings out the flowers and insects. Good IQ, sharpness, handling, etc. ... using it both with the PK/A & PK/M Tamron adapters. I have no trouble shifting my copy into the "Macro" mode, just turn until it falls into position and no need to remove the lens. The close focus is quite good, but it's not really a true "macro" as in the sense like my D FA 100/2.8 WR ... but for the price you cannot beat it! Also, works relatively well with the SP 2x TC (01F) ... Really need better light (daylight) to explore further the close focus aspect ... and yes, the lens barrel will block the subject from the built-in flash if you're too close.
Overall, very happy ... I will agree with the consensus opinion and give this lens a "9" based performance and price range ... if you come across one that fits your budget, don't hesitate.
Here's the link to the Adaptall-2.org page: http://www.adaptall-2.org/lenses/23A.html
Bien cordialement, J Frog | | | | | Junior Member Registered: December, 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 36 | | Review Date: September 8, 2011 | Recommended | Price: $90.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | sharp, good color rendition, excellent Macro | | Cons: | no AF | | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 9
Value: 10
| |
I've owned this for a few, and liked it very much. I also used to own 19AH, but sold it after comparing it to this one. This lens is extremely sharp, excellent Macro, easy to use, no need to use tripod.
Due to its super excellent performance, I spent another $80 and bought a PKA adaptor, makes it easier to use, and a lot of fun.
Here is the link to some of Macro photo I tood with this lens, hope it is useful to you.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48162204@N02/sets/72157628691072227/
I highly recommand this lens to any one who likes to shoot tele photo and Macro.
| | | | | Veteran Member Registered: February, 2011 Location: The 'Stoke, British Columbia Posts: 1,678 | | Review Date: September 7, 2011 | Recommended | Price: $80.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Sharp, nice color rendering, great macro mode | | Cons: | A bit heavy, cheap lens hood | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 10
| |
The only way this lens could b e any better in my opinion, would be if it was weather sealed and went down as wide as 10mm.. but we can't have EVERYTHING in a lens or there would only be one model made! The Macro mode on this lens is fantastic, the colour rendering through the focal range and at all distances is nice and even compared to the 19AH. I would hate to see what an update of this lens would cost new on the market now days, most likely $1000+
| | | | | | | | Review Date: June 29, 2011 | Recommended | Price: $90.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Sharp....excellent contrast.....better than my 19AH at 210mm | | Cons: | long fully extended making it a bit front end heavy. | |
Enough people have reviewed this lens so I see no need to state what has been clearly stated already other than to say I agree with the reviews.
I will add my findings as compared to my Vivitar Series 1 Komine and Adaptal 70-210 3.5 19AH.
I have tested all three side by side in typical shooting applications that fit my style. I say my style as it may not be your style.
In the 210mm range from f5.6 to f11 I was rather shocked at what I found. The 60-300 was clearly sharper and had better contrast than either of the other 2 lenses. This was not expected....so I tested them again...same shot...same daylight...no filters...same ISO, shutter speeds, aperature...etc. From about 150- 210 this lense was clearly better. This was more easily seen at 100% crop.
I was more concerned with results on the longer end as this is where I will use them mainly. Maybe at 70mm results may be slightly different however from the shots I have taken they look similar between the three.
Macro was rather usefull however I have the 90mm 2.5 with 2x for that application. However if I have the 60-300 on and not wish to swap lenses for a quick macro shot it would do quite well.
Again the rest has been covered rather well by previous reviewers sono need to babble on.
I use this currently with the PK adapter while I wait for a KA adapter to arrive. Works fine...stop down metering works fine and is not a big deal. Just be sure you get an ORIGINAL PK adapter and not one of the newer knockoffs as the newer ones cannot stop down the lens. These new adapters are worthless.
Added 7-03-2011
I did some more side by side testing between the three stated lenses. Especially looking at purple fringing as it is known to occur on all three lenses to some degree.
The worst of the group was the Vivitar Series 1 komine. Really took to around F8 to get rid of it around high contrast shots and even then a bit was still noted.
The 60-300 was well controlled around F4 and nothing was noted by F5.6
The 19A 70-210 was similar in respects to the 60-300 for controlling PF. Now my copy of the 19AH has some spider webbing in the inner glass ( hummm...darn ebay)...so this may affect this lens. With that said the 60-300 was still a bit sharper and had better contrast but again...this lens is clean with no spider webbing verses the 19AH....sadly.
Samples examined at 100%
| | | | | Site Supporter Registered: November, 2010 Location: California Posts: 2,223 | | Review Date: April 10, 2011 | Recommended | Price: $170.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | Sharp, great range, great macro range, good IQ, heavy | | Cons: | Expensive PKA adapter (paid higher price for it than for the lens) | |
This is a great lens, it commands respect everywhere it goes. The quality of the macro is outstanding, I almost don't use my Tamron 90mm f2.8 anymore. I have been using this lens for everything, to the point that I almost do not use my Pentax FA 100-300mm f4.7 anymore. It is that good, or a bit better. I you see one, grab it. I bought another one before the price goes up. I would give this lens 9.5 (however, since there is no 9.5, I will err on the side of truth) only because I reserve the 10 for it little brother: Tamron Adaptall-2 SP 70-210mm f3.5. Keep in mind that you need to buy an adaptall converter to Pentax PKA (about $120 more). It is worth if you want nice pictures. Here are some pics.
-----------------
---------------------
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/palenquero/5623188714/in/photostream/lightbox/
--------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/palenquero/5622600497/in/photostream/lightbox/
-------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/palenquero/5623188306/in/photostream/lightbox/
-------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/palenquero/5623188436/in/photostream
-----------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/palenquero/5623188482/in/photostream/lightbox/
---------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/palenquero/5623188624/in/photostream
--------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/palenquero/5622600981/in/photostream
--------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/palenquero/5622600791/in/photostream
----------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/palenquero/5623188364/in/photostream/lightbox/
-------------------
| | |
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
