Author: | | New Member Registered: November, 2019 Posts: 1 | Review Date: April 9, 2023 | Not Recommended | Price: $356.00
| Rating: 4 |
Pros: | Reasonably powerful. HSS | Cons: | Long-term reliability. | | Bought this as an upgrade for my 645D and K-1, after being very satisfied with a Pentax AF 360FGZ.
Initially very pleased with it's power and capability, after three years of very moderate use I have been disappointed to find it has developed increasing unreliablity; becoming very hit and miss as to whether it will fire when you trip your shutter release....... | | | | | Veteran Member Registered: September, 2017 Location: Medellín Posts: 1,322 | Review Date: December 31, 2019 | Recommended | Price: $400.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | WR, recycle time, LED. | Cons: | No bounce card, F5P or power pack connector, laser AF assist. | | Bought two units new, both failed, one beyond repair, the other is up and running. Bought a third one used here on the forum. So far no more problems. They lack a lot of connectivity and power options, but do the job.
| | | | Pentaxian Registered: March, 2008 Posts: 355 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: August 11, 2017 | Recommended | Price: $450.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Solid built | Cons: | No red AF spot beam | | I have this to replace 2 AF540FGZ.
The good:
Solid construction, much better hot shoe mount, WR.
Smaller size and faster recycle time.
Video light
The bad:
No red AF spot beam - Using white light for focusing is very glaring for people in the dark.
No bounce card - going into the menu for secondary light is slower.
No socket for HV battery pack - I had one for the AF540FGZ.
Still I bought it mainly for the WR and 3 sec recycle time.
| | | | Senior Member Registered: August, 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 233 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: February 28, 2017 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Relatively Small, Powerful, Easy to Use | Cons: | No "A" Setting, Bounce Flash Card, Pricy, maybe a bit weaker than the old AF540 | | This is really a great flash. I've used the old AF360fgz and the old AF540fgz, as well as the Sigma EF530 and many old auto flashes. This one is the easiest to use by far.
It is the same size as the AF360 (first version), so it is much smaller than the old AF540. The whole unit feels quality. It doesn't have those stupid battery door problems that plague other Pentax flashes. Cycle time is very quick because you rarely use the full power of the flash. The head is pretty much infinitely adjustable. The LED light is handy for video and sometimes just to get a bit of light. The foot is metal and slides in easily, much better than older flashes. With this flash, you no longer get that high pitched "nuclear reactor charging" whine you do with older flashes.
P-TTL of course, is not always super reliable, and I miss having an auto flash setting (which the old models had). Also the little bounce card is missing on the new 360 and 540. The card was really useful for quick macro work. I also feel this flash is slightly weaker than the old 540 but maybe that is because the zoom only goes to 58mm on APS-C.
All in all, it is a great flash, if a bit pricy.
Responses to earlier critical reviews:
I am very used to the Pentax flash menu system, so all the functions work great. Yes, it doesn't have a radio, but you know this going in. It does wireless through the flash.
HSS works well and that is really the main reason for buying a expensive modern flash no?
I used 2300mah Rechargeables and they worked great. I stopped at 100 flashes, but it was still going strong.
| | | | | New Member Registered: November, 2014 Posts: 3 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: September 6, 2016 | Not Recommended | Price: $360.00
| Rating: 4 |
Pros: | ? | Cons: | price, picky functionality, dumb | | The only reason I bought this flash is to use the rear curtain sync. It seems that functionality doesn't work on manual mode. In comparison, my Nikon D80 worked with _any_ flash for rear curtain sync.
I'm utterly disappointed. The modes are confusing, it's pricey; there is no radio sync option.
If you don't need HSS or the barely ever working rear curtain sync, just by a few Yongnuo YN 560 IV - you'll get 4 for the price of a single Pentax unit.
| | | | Inactive Account Registered: April, 2015 Location: Niagara Falls Posts: 14 | Review Date: July 2, 2016 | Not Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 3 |
Pros: | GN | Cons: | inconsistant exposures | | So I'm totally unimpressed with this flash thus far. Bought it when I bought my 645z and first shot was grossly overexposed. Next one was better, one after that was hot, no consistency. Spoke to some people who thought it might be a compatibility issue with the z.... fast forward a year, bought a K-1, slapped it on the body, same issue. No consistency in the exposures.
I'm going to send it in to service to see if I got a bum flash, hopefully that will be the cause.
I'd love some feedback from other owners that have tried on either of the two bodies I own.
I'll re-review once I get it back from service.
Thanks!
Z
| | | | Veteran Member Registered: October, 2012 Location: Colorado Posts: 1,437 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: January 3, 2016 | Recommended | Price: $354.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Build quality, high-speed sync, features, power, weather sealed | Cons: | Drains batteries, first copy melted the Fresnel, too many settings | | Hands-down, this is the best flash I've ever used. For me, the mot useful part of it is triggering my on-camera flash at 1/16th power and having this flash off-body providing the majority of the illumination. That makes this an ideal flash for off-body work with minimal frontal fill to cancel harsh shadows. That said, it too k me a few minutes to figure out how to do that because the flash has so dang many features that it's hard to figure out what they all do.
The flash is VERY powerful and bright. I accidentally had the flash in corner of my eye when it went off during a shoot and I that eye only had flash residual in it for a minute or two. So do not look into this flash when it goes off nor should you touch the Fresnel and the flash puts off a LOT of heat.
The flash also tears through batteries like Cookie Monster through the Keebler factory. I put in four, fully-charged, 2,400 MaH AAs and they was getting the low-battery warning after ten flashes. That may have as much to do with the batteries' age as the flash, or it may have been draining them too quickly. The batteries were too hot to touch when I took them out, which is not uncommon with my most powerful flashes. Just be aware of that ahead of time.
Overall, this is a really tremendous piece of gear and if you need a lot of light with a lot of features and weather sealing, this is a flash that can't be beat.
| | | | Loyal Site Supporter Registered: September, 2009 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 7,585 5 users found this helpful | Review Date: May 5, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $420.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Relatively small, clear feature set and operation | Cons: | Price | | I have had the AF360FGZ for several years and have used it frequently. When the the AF 540FGZ II arrived I was amazed to find that it is a bit smaller than the AF360 although it is slightly heavier. The AF560FGZII is a solid feeling performer. So far, I have mainly used it with PTTL and it has been spot on every time. The bounce/swivel helps create soft, interesting lighting for portraits even when the flash is on the camera. I am very pleased with the flash. The price a a little higher than I would like but it is worth it for the extra features and weather proofing in a small package. I also always like to have Pentax products if possible. Here is a photo of the two flash guns to show relative sized. | | | | Pentaxian Registered: September, 2011 Location: Nelson B.C. Posts: 3,782 4 users found this helpful | Review Date: February 28, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $400.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Build, size, Pttl consistency, LED light, hotshoe mechanism | Cons: | No saving of settings across power cycle. | | I purchased it specifically for weather resistance. We have had little rain since I got it
Shooting with the K3 there have been very few instances where the pttl has exposed poorly. I have taken lots of shots of my dogs indoors and the results have been consistently good, either bounce or straight on. Outdoors typically I have a flash extender similar to the better beamer and it has worked well, but too few occasions to have a sound opinion. One instance it was wet, early morning and I got better results manually, mostly due to hot spots on the water drops. A tough metering environment. I usually under expose and push in post to avoid the bright reflections.
The size is surprisingly nice. Battery and recycle is about the same as anything else I've shot; most of the time if I'm shooting continuous shots I'm at less than full power. I use rechargeable eneloops and I don't remember when I changed them last.
I like the manual on off switch, it is positive and instantaneous. In some conditions I will switch off the flash, user mode1 to take some shots in the bright light, them walk a ways, flash on, X mode to get something in the bushes.
The controls are good. I would like a mode saving, since power cycling resets to default all the settings. The power saving works very well. Half button press and it's on, it becomes an extension to the body. The yongnuo I shot with would not awaken until an exposure was taken.
To adjust the power, Set button, thumb dial, then Set button. To set to manual, Mode button once, then adjust the power. HSS, Sync button four times. Off-on and it is back to pttl 0.0.
A few other small things that I like, the vertical angle locks at horizontal. A previous flash unit would sag to the macro angle with the flash extender installed. The LED light is bright, I've used it a few times for locking focus in the dark, as well as a flashlight. It supposedly can replace the green focus adjust light on the body but I have yet to use it that way successfully. That is one setting I wish would carry over power cycles.
I have yet to try the slave modes. I use them for macro shooting.
I like the hot shoe mechanism. It is loose and sloppy, very easy to get on and off the body, but once on it clamps tight and secure.
Those are my impressions so far. Definitely nothing in the design or operation that annoys. The Metz AF50 is a great flash, tough and reliable, but it ended up being left on the desk because of the somewhat obtuse interface. The yongnuos needed a shoe lace to prevent sagging, although I must say that for the money they are excellent. The Pentax is becoming part of my standard gear when I go for walks.
A year from now when I have used it in all seasons and weather my opinion will be more valuable.
| | | | Site Supporter Registered: October, 2006 Location: North Face of Mount Shasta Posts: 120 | Review Date: February 16, 2015 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Solid Build, Compact, LED Catchlight, Ease of Use | Cons: | Expensive | | No doubt the best flash ever from Pentax. The learning curve is small, the menu system is well organized and easy to access settings.
The flash performed as well as anything I've ever used in P-TTL. On my K-3, flash photos both direct and indirect were well exposed and pleasing to the eye. The catch light is a very nice side benefit.
I was also surprised at the compact form ... actually smaller than my AF360. The build is professional and communicates quality throughout.
My only complaint about this product is the current price ... hopefully we will see it come down where it belongs in the near future. I really want one on a permanent basis.
| | | | Senior Member Registered: January, 2014 Location: viking country Posts: 276 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: November 1, 2014 | Recommended | Price: $470.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | powerful, weathersealed, swivels in all directions, led light, size | Cons: | pricey | | I'm surprised this flash isn't reviewed, it has been on the market for quite some time and it is really a very competent flash. It has every feature that you are likely to use as an amateur, the pentax system lacks a few things for studio use but you can't blame the flash for that.
Most of the time this flash is used with a cable and a softbox for daylight shooting, thats also the reason I went for the more powerful one. Overpowering the sun is a full time job. At the time I bought this I was choosing between this and the metz 52, but weather sealing wss the deal breaker, I fish alot and do alot of other things outdoor, so I needed it. I've not had reason to regret my choice a single time. The construction is sturdy yet compact and it's got that air of quality to it. Sure it stings in the wallet to give $400 for a flash when the metz is down to $250 at the moment, but at the same time you do get real quality.
On the photo course me and two others are in charge of we went through flash techniques last time and we had Pentax, Canon, Nikon, Metz and Yongnuo flashes represented, the pentax was the center of attention, people commented on how small it was, the quality feel of it, a consensus was reached that of all flashes there, the pentax was without doubt the mose well made.
I guess in the end it boils down to, do you need weather sealing and the power this flash dishes out go for it, if not then there are cheaper versions available
| | |