Author: | | New Member Registered: June, 2016 Posts: 1 | Review Date: June 14, 2016 | Recommended | Price: $75.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | rugged build quality, nice balance, smooth wind on, simple viewfinder | Cons: | no mirror lock up | | I acquired my KM in July last year for £50 including a 55mm f2 lens. I wanted the camera as a reasonably priced back up to my ME Super. I was immediately struck be the nice feel and balance of the camera and its simple operation. All appeared to be working correctly until about Xmas when the slow shutter speeds, 30th and below would stick. Off to the camera doctor it went. Upon return and £80 lighter I found I had a beautifully clean and accurate camera almost like new so I viewed the initial problem philosophically:-
In 1981 when I started seriously to enjoy photography would I have considered £130 for a good quality machine and lens which would last decades good value? Absolutely! Allowing for inflation I have got an absolute bargain.
I prefer this model to the K1000, not because it has DOF, but because it has a self timer. I often lose,forget or manage to break cable releases so I find this addition essential. I like to use it with its original lens or a Tokina 70-210 f4-5.6, or Pentax ka 35-70 f4 as these balance nicely with the camera. The small prime m series lenses which go so well with the ME Super feel and look silly on this body IMO.
Subsequent to my purchase I got a black KX body for £65. As other posts have mentioned this has a much more comprehensive feature list, including mirror lock up and full information viewfinder. I like the MLU on the KX but the viewfinder information I can take or leave. I find it difficult to decide which I prefer out of the 2 models because I prefer the wind on of the KM, so for me both have their pros and cons. However I would be perfectly happy with either model if I had to make a choice between the 2.
| | | | | Junior Member Registered: March, 2014 Posts: 27 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: April 4, 2014 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | solid, DOF control, easy to use. | Cons: | | | Got this camera as a second Pentax body in addition to my KX. I like it (almost) just as much for the same reasons;
-solid build quality, nice size for my hands
-convenient K mount
-uses silveroxide batteries
-goes on without batteries
Compared to th KX it doesn't have mirror lockup and lacks shutter and aperture info in the viewfinder. I never use mirror lockup though and don't necessarily have to see more info then + and - and a needle in the viewfinder. A quick look at the top of the camera gives you the rest of the info as well. So compared to the KX the viewfinder is even more clean and basic.
I would always prefer a KM over a K1000. One of the main advantages of using a SLR is that you can 'see what you get'. It seems very silly to me not to be able to control DOF on a SLR. With the K1000, you can't. With the KM, you can.
| | | | Veteran Member Registered: October, 2012 Location: Colorado Posts: 1,437 | Review Date: September 11, 2013 | Not Recommended | Price: $40.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Simple to Use, Easy to Learn, User-friendly | Cons: | A bit of an odd child in the lineup | | This camera is basically a K1000 with a DoF preview and self-timer. Honestly, there's no reason to get this instead of a K1000 and an add-on self timer. Those old clockwork self timers that screw into the shutter release button are pretty awesome anyway.
I like my KM. I leaned "no" for my recommendation to suggest it, but would have answered "maybe" if that were an option. If this and the K1000 were the same price, I dunno, get either one. They're the same camera anyway.
I just don't really feel like the KM has a reason to exist in the K lineup. The K2 and KX I get, totally, and the K1000 as well. But adding the fourth is kind of like having three thoroughbreds and, for fun, then getting a musk ox. It's a fine camera with nothing whatsoever wrong. And I love the DoF preview, but I always find myself asking "what's the big whoop?" when I use it. I like my K1000 more, and the KX, too. The KM does double duty with the K1000 but not enough to be a viable in-between for the K1000 and KX. | | | | Site Supporter Registered: August, 2012 Location: Queensland Posts: 4,288 | Review Date: August 20, 2012 | Recommended | Price: $80.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Solid Metal Quality | Cons: | Limits are sometimes seen as negatives. I accept them. | | Bought this off Craig's list in very good condition with seals redone. I think of it as my big MX. I love the heavy feel of it along with lasting quality. Others have mentioned it's limits so I won't repeat them, except to say if you don't need a feature, then it is one less thing to go wrong.
If you like the K1000 then you like the KM by default, unless you hate the self-timer and depth of field button. The body is basically carried over from the Spotmatic era, with a change to the K mount.
The most important thing one needs is a good lens and a sold camera to mount it on, along with the appropriate film. They are the essentials for a good picture. The other stuff is just to make it easier to get. Mine has the underrated M 50 f2.0 which took this photo | | | | | Forum Member Registered: July, 2010 Location: Cardiff, UK Posts: 65 | Review Date: May 17, 2012 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Solid, well-designed, and reliable | Cons: | Not many: viewfinder not as bright as one might hope | | This was my first Pentax (I was in my early teens). It came with the 55/1.8 and I loved them both. I still have them after something like 34 years. This camera never broke down. It's heavy, maybe, by MX/ME standards. But it is just a fine camera overall,even if the viewfinder could be brighter. A perfect first camera - more so than the K1000, I think, if only because of the depth of field preview button.
| | | | Inactive Account Registered: January, 2012 Location: Klaipeda Posts: 3 | Review Date: April 19, 2012 | Recommended | Price: $45.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | fully manual, DOF preview, built like a tank, LR44 or SR44 batteries | Cons: | none | | It was my first SLR camera and I bought it from private seller in Lithuania. Didn't know much about Pentax cameras when decided to by this KM and was very happy I did it. Later I found that KM is like K1000 on steroids - with DOF preview and self timer functions added. I like needle metering very much and glad that it is accurate. Well built, easy to operate camera.
| | | | Senior Member Registered: December, 2006 Location: Lincoln, UK Posts: 229 | Review Date: May 27, 2011 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 7 |
| The pros and cons have been covered by the other reviewers.
To me this was always the K mount version of the Spotmatic F. It was the middle of the line up of the first 3 cameras, The K1000 being the bayonet version of the SP1000 ie a cut down cheaper version for students.
Because of the "reputation" of the K1000 and it's longevity you could often get a better camera for about half the price.
Two points to consider. Unless it has been done in the last 20 years or so, you will need to get it serviced to be able to use it. Unless they have been replaced, the original seals will be a gooey mess and the shutter is likely to start capping.
Better than a K1000 but the KX is even better!
Kim
| | | | Site Supporter Registered: October, 2008 Location: Vancouver, Canada Posts: 8,076 | Review Date: June 16, 2010 | Recommended | Price: $100.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Famous K series looks and build. | Cons: | No mirror lock-up, no shutter release lock leaver, no | |
Pros | Famous K series looks and build. | Cons | No mirror lock-up, no shutter release lock leaver, no "Judas" window. | Rating | 8 | Price | Black - $150.00, Silver - $50.00 (Estimated, was purchased in a kit) | Years Owned | 1 |
I can recommend this camera: Yes Value, Features, Performance & Size
The KM is kind of unique as it has the looks of a KX but some of the features of a screw mount Spotmatic. It shares the same soft Eveready case as the KX. The KM was the least expensive K series body from the original 1975 line-up.
Features:
- Famous K series looks and build. (Comes in black & silver)
- Easy to use/set film speed (ASA) dial.
- DOF preview button.
- Self Timer.
Missing Features Compared to the KX.
- No mirror lock-up.
- No shutter release lock leaver.
- Meter is turned on by removing lens cap.
- Matching needle meter system.
- Unable to see shutter speed or aperture setting (Judas window) from viewfinder. Camera Review
The KM is the latest addition to my K series body collection and my recent "Black" looks as good as a K2.
Overall not a bad Pentax body, but you can get a KX for close to the same price and the KX is a better overall choice.
However as a fully manual film camera for “students” this is a way better choice than a K1000 and is around the same price.
| | | | Veteran Member Registered: September, 2006 Location: Ames, Iowa Posts: 774 | Review Date: April 13, 2010 | Recommended | Price: $10.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | adds useful features (not frills) to popular K1000 | Cons: | no light meter switch | | I've done my share of shooting with K1000s, like many other people here. At those times, the one thing I keep finding myself wishing for is depth of field preview. Once in every ten shots or so, it's of critical use in composing more confidently in three dimensions. But now I have a KM. It is essentially identical to the K1000, except it adds the DOF preview feature and a self-timer.
On a recent road trip where I had brought along a KM, an LX, and an ME Super, I found myself reaching for the KM most of the time.
To me, the charm of the KM is the viewfinder, which it shares with the K1000 and Spotmatics. It's big enough and bright enough to be involving, but it's also undistracting; there are no lights, no icons, no numbers. Just that simple needle. Strictly speaking, that makes it less informative than the heads-up displays you are probably used to, but you might find an upside, which is a stronger Zen-like sense of connection with the subject.
Prices on KMs seem to vary quite a bit. Sometimes you can find them cheaper than a K1000 in similar condition, because the latter is so much better known.
The only thing I wish Pentax had done differently on this model would have been to add a tangible meter switch; it is always on when the lens is uncapped. I worry sometimes about forgetting the lens cap and running the battery down.
| | | | Veteran Member Registered: February, 2007 Location: Sterling, VA, USA Posts: 6,275 | Review Date: October 29, 2009 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: N/A |
| The KM was my first ever SLR and I have it to this day and it's going strong. I'm getting ready to send it and my MX off for a cleaning but only out of a desire to further extend it's life. This camera was also AWOL for about 6 years after I loaned it to my son to take to college. When he came back the KM was nowhere to be found until about 6 months ago when I found it buried in a box of his clothes when cleaning and sorting stuff in the garage. Needless to say I was thrilled and relieved at the re-discovery.
These cameras are built like rocks or tanks and will take any punishment you can dish out. Mine has been everywhere from the summit of Pikes Peak to the depths of some of the deepest caves in Tennessee and Alabama. It's been wet (never dunked), it's been frozen, it's been roasted and it's always delivered.
Mike
| | |