The Latest

Forum

Cameras

Lenses

Pentax Camera Reviews » Pentax Digital Cameras » Pentax Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Cameras

Pentax Q

Ergonomics	8.6
Build Quality	9.4
User Interface	9.0
Autofocus	8.3
Features	9.0
Value	8.9
Image Quality	7.7
Noise	7.4

Reviews	Views	Date of last review
28	78,900	Sat March 18, 2017

Recommended By	Average Price	Average User Rating
93% of reviewers	$300.04	8.54

supersize	supersize	supersize
supersize	supersize	supersize

Description:

Announced on July 23, 2011, the Pentax Q is the first mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera from Pentax. Alongside the camera, five lenses were launched, as well as accessories including a polarizing filter, lens hoods, and an external optical viewfinder for the kit lens (01 Standard Prime).

Our In-Depth Pentax Q review

The Pentax Q uses all-new lens system which is much smaller and more basic than the traditional K-mount system. The lenses are broken up into two categories: "High performance" and "Unique". The high performance lenses are compatible with filters and lens hoods. Visit our lens database to browse Pentax Q compatible lenses.

The Pentax Q is marketed as the "world’s smallest, lightest interchangeable-lens digital camera body," which is made possible due to the lack the intricate (and bulky) components of SLRs. The body weighs a mere 180g without the battery, and less than 250g with a lens! The camera is only slightly larger than a standard playing card and can even fit on your keychain, if you fancy.

The image sensor employed is a 12.4-megapixel, 1/2.33 inch backlit-CMOS unit. Pentax claims that this new sensor can deliver high-quality images due to innovation in design and image processing. The camera is also capable of recording full-HD (1080p) video at 30 frames per second, and its maximum photo framerate is 5 FPS, with a buffer for up to 5 images at 5 FPS and 100 images at 1.5 FPS, at 12 megapixels and maximum quality.

The Pentax Q shares several exciting features with Pentax DSLRs, including a sensor-shift Shake Reduction system, the Dust Removal II system, built-in auto flash with a pop-up mechanism, HDR mode, and a variety of shooting modes such as P, Tv, Av, M, and SCENE. It also has a host of new software functions designed to enhance image appearance, such as "Smart Effect modes", "Bokeh control", and "Electronic shutter".

Sample photos taken with the Q

Price with lens: $799
Expected US availability: September, 2011

Complete specifications (from the Pentax Japan web site):

General

Type	Lens-interchangeable digital-still camera
Lens Mount	PENTAX bayonet Q-mount
Compatible Lens	Q-mount lenses

Sensor

Image Sensor	Type: CMOS sensor with a primary color filter, Size: 1/2.3-inch (4.55 x 6.17 mm)
Effective Pixels	Approx. 12.4 megapixels
Total Pixels	Approx. 12.75 megapixels
Dust Removal	Image sensor cleaning using ultrasonic vibrations "DR II"
Sensitivity	AUTO: ISO 125 to 6400 (1/3 EV steps), Bulb mode: up to ISO 1600
Image Stabilizer	Sensor shift Shake Reduction

File Formats

File Format	RAW (DNG), JPEG (Exif 2.3), DCF2.0 compliant
Recorded Pixels	<JPEG> [4:3] 12M (4000x3000), 9M (3456x2592), 5M (2688x2016), 3M (1920x1440) [3:2] 10M (4000x2664), 8M (3456x2304), 5M (2688x1792), 2M (1920x1280) [16:9] 9M (4000x2248), 6M (3456x1944), 4M (2688x1512), 2M(1920x1080) [1:1] 9M (2992x2992), 6M (2592x2592), 4M (2016x2016), 2M (1440x1440) <RAW>[4:3] 12M (4000x3000)
Quality Level	RAW (12bit): DNG JPEG: (Best), (Better), (Good) RAW and JPEG simultaneously recordable
Color Space	sRGB, AdobeRGB
Storage Medium	SD, SDHC, and SDXC Memory Card
Storage Folder	Date (100_1018, 100_1019...)/PENTX (100PENTX, 101PENTX...)

LCD Monitor

Type	TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing
Size	3.0 inches
Pixels	Approx. 460,000
Adjustment	Brightness and colors adjustable
Display	Field of View: approx. 100%, Grid display (4x4 Grid, Golden Section, Scale display), Bright/dark area warning, Histogram

White Balance

Auto	TTL by CMOS image sensor
Preset	Daylight, Shade, Cloudy, Fluorescent Light (D: Daylight Color, N: Daylight White, W: Cool White, L:Warm White), Tungsten, Flash, CTE, Manual
Manual	Configuration on monitor
Fine Adjustment	Adjustable ±7 steps on A-B axis or G-M axis

Autofocus System

Type	Contrast detection AF
Brightness Range	EV1 to 18(ISO125)
Focus Method	AF/MF switching
Autofocus Method	Face Detection, Tracking, AF Select (25 Points), Select, Spot
AF Assist Light	Dedicated LED AF assist light
MF Assist	OFF/×2/×4

Metering

Type	TTL image sensor metering, segment metering, centerweighted metering, and spot metering
Exposure Compensation	EV1.3 - 17 (ISO 125, F1.9 lens), +2EV using the Electronic Shutter setting or using the ND filter
Exposure Modes	<Auto Picture mode> Standard, Portrait, Landscape, Macro, Night Scene Portrait, Night Scene, Blue Sky, Forest <Scene Mode> Portrait, Landscape, Macro, Moving Object, Night Scene Portrait, Sunset, Blue Sky, Night Scene, Night Scene HDR, Night Snap, Food, Quick Macro, Pet, Kids, Forest, Surf & Snow, HDR, Backlight Silhouette, Candlelight, Stage Lighting, Museum, Program, Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority, Manual, Bulb, Blur Control *JPEG only
EV Compensation	± 3EV (1/3EV step)
AE Lock	Can be assigned to the green/delete button from the menu. Continuous as long as the shutter release button is pressed halfway.
Shutter	Lens shutter: 1/2000 - 30 seconds (1/3EV step, 1/8000 - 30 seconds when Electronic Shutter setting is enabled), Bulb *Shooting at 1/8000 - 2 seconds with Electronic Shutter and Bulb shooting are not available when using a lens that has no lens shutter.
Aperture	From wide open to F8 *Not available when using a lens that has no lens shutter.
ND Filter	Off/On *Not available when using a lens that has no lens shutter.

Drive Modes

Mode Selection	Single frame, Continuous (Hi, Lo), Self-timer (12s, 2s), Remote Control (0 sec., 3 sec., continuous), Auto Bracketing (3 frames, remote control)
Continuous Shooting	Approx. 5 fps, JPEG (12M Continuous Hi): up to 5 frames Approx. 1.5 fps, JPEG (12M Continuous Lo): up to 100 frames

Built-in Flash

Built-in Flash	Built-in retractable P-TTL flash
Guide number	approx. 5.6 (ISO125/m) / approx. 7 (ISO200/m)
Angle of view	coverage: wide angle-lens, equivalent to 28mm in 35mm format
Flash Modes	P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync
Sync Speed	Lens shutter: 1/2000 seconds, Electronic shutter: 1/13 seconds
Flash Exposure Compensation	–2.0 to +1.0 EV

Capture Functions

Custom Image	Bright, Natural, Portrait, Landscape, Vibrant, Radiant, Muted, Bleach Bypass, Reversal Film, Monochrome, Cross Processing
Noise Reduction	High-ISO NR
Dynamic Range Setting	Highlight Correction, Shadow Correction
Lens Correction	Distortion Correction
Digital Filter	Toy Camera, High Contrast, Shading, Slim, HDR, Invert Color, Extract Color, Color, Water Color, Posterization, Fish-eye
HDR Capture	Auto, HDR 1, HDR 2
Multi-exposure	Number of shots: 2-9, Exposure adjusted automatically.
Interval Shooting	Shooting interval: 1 sec. to 24 hr., Start Interval setting: immediately from the set time Number of shots: up to 999 images
Smart Effect	Brilliant Color, Unicolor Bold, Vintage Color, Cross Processing, Warm Fade, Tone Expansion, Bold Monochrome, Water Color, Vibrant Color Enhance, USER 1 to 3

Movie

File Format	MPEG–4 AVC/H.264
Recorded Pixels	Full HD (1920x1080, 16:9, 30fps), HD (1280x720, 16:9, 30fps), VGA (640x480, 4:3, 30fps)
Quality Level	(Best), (Better), (Good)
Sound	Built-in monaural microphone
Recording Time	Up to 25 minutes; automatically stops recording if the internal temperature of the camera becomes high.
Custom Image	Bright, Natural, Portrait, Landscape, Vibrant, Radiant, Muted, Bleach Bypass, Reversal Film, Monochrome, Cross Processing
Digital Filter	Toy Camera, High Contrast, Shading, Slim, HDR, Invert Color, Extract Color, Color, Water Color, Posterization, Fish-eye
Interval Movie	Recording interval: 1 sec., 5 sec., 10 sec., 30 sec., 1 min., 5 min., 10 min., 30 min., 1 hr., Recording time: 5 sec. to 99 hr. Start Interval setting: immediately, from the set time

Playback Functions

Playback View	Single frame, image comparison, multi-image display (4, 9, 20, 42, 90 segmentation), display magnification (up to 16x, scrolling and quick magnification available), rotating, histogram (Y histogram, RGB histogram), bright/dark area warning, detailed information display, folder display, calendar display, slideshow
Delete	Delete single image, delete all images, select & delete, delete folder, delete instant review image
Digital Filter	Monochrome, Toy Camera, High Contrast, Shading, Slim, HDR, Invert Color, Extract Color, Color, Water Color, Posterization, Fish-eye, Retro, Soft, Sketch Filter, Miniature, Frame Composite, Starburst, Base Parameter Adjustment
RAW Development	File Format (JPEG), Aspect Ratio, Color Space, Custom Image, White Balance, Sensitivity, High-ISO NR, Shadow Correction, Distortion Correction
Edit	Resize, Cropping (aspect ratio adjustment available), Index, Movie Editing (divide or delete selected frames), Capturing a JPEG still picture from a movie, Red-eye Edit, Saving buffer as a RAW file

Customization

Custom Functions	13 items
Mode Memory	12 items
Button/Dial Customization	Green/Delete button: Green Button, Preview, One Push File Format, AE Lock, Enable AF Quick Dial: Smart Effect, Custom Image, Digital Filter, Aspect Ratio
World Time	World Time settings for 75 cities (28 time zones)
Language	English, French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Dutch, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Polish, Czech, Hungarian, Turkish, Greek, Russian, Korean, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese, and Japanese

Power Supply

Battery Type	Rechargeable Lithium-ion Battery D-LI68
AC Adapter	AC Adapter Kit K-AC115 (optional)
Battery Life	Number of recordable images: approx. 230 images (with 50% flash usage) approx. 250 images (without flash usage) Playback time: approx. 160 minutes

Interfaces

Connection Port	USB 2.0 (high-speed compatible) / AV output terminal, HDMI output terminal (Type D)
USB Connection	MSC/PTP
Video Output Format	NTSC/PAL

Dimensions and Weight

Dimensions	Approx. 98.0mm (W) x 57.5mm (H) x 31.0mm (D) (excluding the operation parts and protrusion)
Weight	Approx. 200g (loaded and ready with the dedicated battery and SD Memory Card) Approx. 180 g (body only)

Accessories

Package Contents	USB Cable I-USB7, Strap O-ST115, Rechargeable Lithium-ion Battery D-LI68, Battery Charger D-BC68P, Software (CDROM) S-SW115, Hot shoe cover FK, Body mount cover
Firmware	Link to Latest Firmware
Software	SILKYPIX Developer Studio 3.0 for PENTAX

Megapixels:

12.4

ISO Range:

125-6400

Weight:

180g

FPS:

LCD:

3.0 inch

In Production:

Manual:

http://www.pentax.jp/english/support/man-pdf/q.pdf

In-Depth Review:

Price History:

Page 1 of 2

⟶

Author:

Sort Reviews by: Date | Author | Rating | Recommendation | Likes (Descending) Showing Reviews 1-15 of 28

Wired

Veteran Member

Registered: August, 2009

Location: Edmonton, AB

Posts: 2,519

16 users found this helpful

Review Date: March 30, 2012

Recommended | Price: $650.00 | Rating: 9

Pros:	fun factor, image quality, size, options, control layout, iso noise
Cons:	cost, getting over the size of the sensor, battery life
Ergonomics: 10 Build Quality: 10 User Interface: 8 Autofocus: 7 Features: 10 Value: 8 Image Quality: 9 Noise: 10 New or Used: New

The problem with the Pentax Q is digital camera snobbery. This camera has a tiny form factor, it has a tiny sensor, it has a big price, and when you look at it the first time you may think that Pentax was smoking something pretty special when they designed this little camera. For the purpose of this tale, we will assume from here on out that I am using the Pentax Prime 01 kit lens and nothing else.

Then you touch it and feel it and suddenly you don't want to tell the salesman that it feels very very solid. The body is all metal, the flappy bits are very well put together, and the rubbery texture of the grip feels sublime. Even the flash on it's transformer arm feels very solid. The buttons and dials click and roll very satisfyingly and feel like they would on Pentax's DSLRs. The only gripe here is the flimsy feeling HDMI/USB door that is getting ever looser on my model.

So you ask the shop keep if they mind if you throw your memory card in to see how it performs. With snickers of "I can't believe this guy is actually interested in this expensive toy camera" he gladly lets you start shooting about. It's then that you notice how well the little guy handles. Buttons are all in the right spots, and if you have used a Pentax before you will be very familiar with how it works... in fact it feels like home.

Then you start diving into the front mounted quick dial. You start finding that the different digital filters are really fun and that you can get some interesting shots very quickly. But the fun doesn't stop there, oh no.

You quickly start jacking up the sensitivity and checking the noise from 100 iso right up to the magical 6400 and notice that even at 800 it is still providing very presentable photos, stuff you wouldn't mind printing and putting on the wall.

The next step is to see depth of field. It's got a tiny sensor, there is no way, no how, that you can get decent depth of field. no no no. Well you would be surprised my snobbish shop keep. Because it in fact does provide decent blury parts without having to use the digital trickery of the Blur Control mode.... which does in fact give you even more blury bits.

So... you ask the shop keep... is it really $699?

"And he goes yes, it is, kinda stupid price isn't it?"\
And you go... "whats your return policy."
"15 days full money back."
"you got one new in box?"
"of course i do, no one in their right mind would buy this, why not look at the Nikon V1?."
"No, I want the Q. Can you do it for $650?"
"Why not, your the first person inquiring at my shop about this thing since we got them a few months ago"

So he grabs you the shiny silver box that looks like it could in fact house a pair of sandals. He takes your money and goes "make sure you hang onto this receipt. I'll see you in a week."

You rush home quickly to charge up that battery. Then you shove it in your pants pocket (comfortably I might add) and head out on the town.

Soon you find that this thing's true meaning in life is to bring the fun and creative juices back into your photography. You start seeing things differently, start planning shots in a more creative way than you would with your K5. You find out that the big thing about this camera is that it delivers the fun factor.

There is no other camera out there that provides more fun! And quality while we are at it.

Images are sharp, crisp, and full of color. Sure it might over-expose a little bit here and there, but thats okay, it shoots RAW! You can fix that later if need be. You also find it does almost everything your lovely DSLR does, just in a smaller package.

Sure you don't get the huge mega pixel shots of your DSLR, but thats not with this is for. This camera is for you to get creative again. To get back to having fun with your photos and bringing you back to the basics.

After a while you start getting a lil frustrated... the camera thinks that something is in focus, and it obviously is blurry as the night you downed a bottle of while at the company party after that beautiful girl in accounting shot you down. But you deal with it because your just having so much fun!

But when you really start crying is when after you shot 180 RAW+jpg images and you start getting the red flashing battery light of death. You try to squeak out one last photo before heading home and the camera just gives you a black screen of death. You sulk back to your car and take the sad drive home, only to know that at least your going to have fun showing all your friends on Pentaxforums what you did with your new Pentax Q.

So as you come home day after day you see your K5 and collections of wonderful K mount glass sitting on the shelf collecting dust, begging for you to pick it up and shoot with it once more... you take pride in the fact that your no longer a sensor snob and put your Q on the charger...as you often do.... going, you know what, I do think I will go see that shop keep. But to get prints done from my Q. But maybe I'll bring my K5 along just so it doesn't feel lonely.

AldAsAck

New Member

Registered: May, 2012

Posts: 15

4 users found this helpful

Review Date: June 6, 2012

Recommended | Price: $520.00 | Rating: 9

Pros:	Crop Factor 5.5 ideal for long range telephotographie
Cons:	Image quality when used as designed
Ergonomics: 8 Build Quality: 8 User Interface: 8 Autofocus: 8 Features: 10 Value: 10 Image Quality: 8 Noise: 7 New or Used: New

I purchased the Pentax Q BECAUSE of its small sensor.
Together with a NOVOFLEX Pentax q / Pentax K adapter and my DA* 300 I use this tiny gem as my long range telephoto camera.
I was inspired by some dicussion here in the blogs and it works out nicely.
You have to get used to always have the tripod set-up and that it is hard to focus using the LCD. But it allows you to make pictures at long range (1600 mm !!!! with DA 300) I ever wanted to do. See the attached comparision Pentx K5 anf Pentax Q with the same lens (DA 300).

http://www.flickr.com/photos/grufti1957/7159708091/in/photostream/lightbox/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/grufti1957/7320335744/in/photostream/lightbox/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/grufti1957/7289099144/in/photostream/lightbox/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/grufti1957/7277755396/in/photostream/lightbox/

stefan22

Junior Member

Registered: October, 2013

Posts: 32

3 users found this helpful

Review Date: February 26, 2014

Not Recommended | Price: $200.00 | Rating: 3

Pros:	tactile
Cons:	no better (in reality) than a $75 compact
Ergonomics: 7 Build Quality: 8 User Interface: 8 Autofocus: 7 Features: 8 Value: 5 Image Quality: 3 Noise: 3 New or Used: Used

I am 100% in agreement with those (reviewers) who have so perfectly put the pentax q into perspective..namely: that it is a very poorly performing camera with pictures that are akin to a $75 compact. now that its price has come down to under $200 this represents fair value as its build quality and ease of use is commendable .. but its picture quality borders on being awful. soft. lacking in definition...and precisely in keeping with its sensor size. by comparison to a pentax k01 or sony nex there just is NO comparison. the ricoh cx4 and cx5 (owned) can be bought for half the cost (under $100) and gives you a far greater versatility. it (the cx camera) does not have raw capabilities but its jpegs are better. not by too much but they are better. there are some fuji cameras that can be bought for under $100 that DO have raw capture and I have found them to eclipse the q in all departments. the q is remarkably tactile and possesses a charm that is hard to rival..but once the novelty of it runs out the q is no more than that: a novelty. if picture quality is important to you there are dozens of camera that give you more for less money. opinion is always a polarizing process with many submitted highs and lows. ultimately.. the good (great) cameras achieve a 'significantly' better than average rating. for me this camera (the q) is currently classed as being above average when user/expert scores are taken into account..but I believe this score to be extremely flattering and wholly undeserved .. and for those of you reading through user scores/opinions in order to determine whether to buy one MY bottom line opinion is: spend your hard earned cash on something more photographically and technically giving...

rob_k20d

Senior Member

Registered: August, 2010

Location: Leeds

Posts: 152

2 users found this helpful

Review Date: June 18, 2013

Recommended | Price: None indicated | Rating: 9

Pros:	Size, controls, cheap (now), affordable fish eye lens
Cons:	limited customisation of user settings, short battery life, focus peaking not as good as other pentax cameras
Ergonomics: 10 Build Quality: 10 User Interface: 10 Autofocus: 9 Features: 10 Value: 10 Image Quality: 9 Noise: 8 New or Used: New

I just don't understand why so many people don't get the Pentax Q - though judging by the other reviews here, I am clearly not the only person.

If you want a camera with a small sensor, why not just get a compact camera?

Because the Q has:

A hot shoe
External buttons and controls more or less like a DSLR
RAW
Different lenses - and fish eye in particular
TAv mode (after firmware update)
Usual Pentax green button (Or one button swith between jpeg and RAW)
A nice prime lens - which has quick shift focusing
Not to mention useful features that my K30 lacks: built in ND filter, remote control and bracketing (together) and remote continuous shooting

And, in addition, interesting macro and telephoto opportunities with adapter.

In short:

When you have leave your DSLR at home and take a compact camera instead, what doyou find most frustrating about using the compact camera?

A) Image quality and high ISO performance that doesn't compare to your DSLR
Or
B) The functionality of the camera. The lack of a hot shoe. The lack of raw. The lack of lens choice. The lack of external buttons and controls so that you have to keep accessing the menu to make changes to your settings.

If you answered B, this camera is for you. Despite its tiny size, the feels very much like A DSLR, in terms of its functionality etc.

Docrwm

Veteran Member

Registered: September, 2010

Location: Somewhere in the Southern US

Posts: 12,285

2 users found this helpful

Review Date: November 23, 2012

Recommended | Price: $299.00 | Rating: 9

Pros:	Build quality, size, front dial, range of in-camera options
Cons:	Battery life, price of accessories
Ergonomics: 10 Build Quality: 10 User Interface: 9 Autofocus: 8 Features: 9 Value: 10 Image Quality: 8 Noise: 8 New or Used: New

This is the most fun I have had with a camera in 30 years since my first personal SLR purchase. This little camera is just plain fun to shoot. It's a good platform for using K mount lenses, even with the non-Pentax adapters. I find that the front dial makes using the camera just a lot more fun. I've rediscovered B&W through that dial, wow. I've put a Manfrotto mini-tripod on the Q and its like a little Transformer with its fold away feet and pop-up flash

. If you expect K-5 Raw quality photos you will be disappointed. If you are realistic and compare it to P&S and camera phones it rocks!

PROS:
Tiny
Excellent ergonomics
Build quality is truly outstanding
Lots of menu options
Front dial
Doors for battery and sd card are on the sides making use of tripod a breeze
Controls are easy to use despite small size
Flash extension reduces red eye
Focus peaking with firmware v1.1
In camera SR even non-Q mount lenses via adapter

CONS:
Battery life is poor - buy 3-4 extra non-OEM
Pentax accessories are outrageously pricey
Pentax adapter takes tripod foot that is unavailable
Price until the last month or so

DonThomaso

Pentaxian

Registered: January, 2011

Location: Skåne, Sweden

Posts: 482

2 users found this helpful

Review Date: November 22, 2012

Recommended | Price: $370.00 | Rating: 8

Pros:	Size, build quality, user interface, feature set, fun factor
Cons:	AF-speed in low light, needs high quality manual glass
Ergonomics: 9 Build Quality: 10 User Interface: 10 Autofocus: 8 Features: 10 Value: 9 Image Quality: 7 Noise: 7 New or Used: New

This review is for a black Pentax Q bought new in Sweden, serial nr in the 425xxxx-range. Price is for the Q + 5-15mm kit (on sale as the Q10 was recently introduced when I bought it). The V1.10 firmware was also released just before my purchase, adding a few nice features like focus peaking and shake reduction with manual glass to name two.

PROS

Size
Fun factor (especially when your friends pops out the "transformer" flash )
Logical user interface (same layout as the K-5 or K-x and many other Pentax DSLRs)
Build quality
Conversation piece

CONS

Requires high quality glass
Auto-focus performance (better in later firmware versions, but not perfect)
Shutter-lag (can be an issue for street photography and similar)

Finally decided to get the Q! I was immediately intrigued by it when released, but it was nowhere to be seen "in the flesh" in Sweden (hard enough with the normal Pentax DSLRs). Also I think that the launch price was too high, but offering a very unique set of specifications it is up to the buyer to decide what it is worth to them.

Build quality is excellent! Very solid construction with its magnesium body and great feeling in buttons, switches, doors etc. No plastic mounts or anything like that. Being so small it can not be called heavy, but it has some weight to it, making it a solid piece of camera. I'm not totally happy with the shutter button though, I find it a bit to soft a initial "half-press" for focus. I was somewhat expecting great build quality, but what was more surprising was the ergonomics! They must have put a lot of effort to make such a small camera so usable. Even if the buttons are small and close together, you somehow end up pressing the right one. I could even use it with my leather gloves on without any problems.

I don't think much need to be said about the user interface. It is very similar to the other Pentax cameras I've used (K-5 and K-x). One of the reasons for buying the Q was for me to get a small camera with such a rich feature set, with possibilities for time-lapse shooting, focus peaking, in-body shake-reduction (even with manual glass), Full-HD movie recording with shake-reduction and just a general deep and customizable feature set. The possibility to exchange lenses on a "compact camera" body is of course a basic reason to buy the Q, and can be seen as a feature if compared to high-end RAW-shooting compacts like the Canon S95, Fuji X10, Olympus XZ-1 and other possible competitors

If I had to complain about something it would be that auto-focus with the 5-15 lens (the only AF lens I have for the Q) does have a hard time locking on in dim light and/or close focus distances (around 0.5 meters or closer). Accuracy and at daylight and normal distances is no problem though, and speed is reasonably fast.

Image quality is a bit hard to judge. It is not comparable to APS-C (K-5, K-x) or even Micro 4/3 (Panasonic GF2), but that wasn't expected either. I don't own or have any larger experience with high-end compacts, but what I've seen it would be around the same performance as most other RAW-shooting 1/1.x or 1/2.x-ish sensor size cameras. This means that at pixel level you can't expect the same detail as lager sensors and neither the same kind of high ISO-performance. If possible shoot at ISO125, but it holds upp very well to ISO400. Around 500-1000 is still very much acceptable, especially if using for web or small print. After that you start to loose details, but color stays pretty accurate up to ISO 2500, which I would have as a general maximum. At 3200-6400 colors gets distorted and lots of noise too. Details are still somewhat alright. Perhaps usable as a last resort if converted to B&W. Generally speaking noise is always present, even at base ISO. It is more of the pleasing "film grain" kind though, so not too disturbing until the higher sensitivities.

The small sensor also requires high quality optics. I'm generally pleased with the 5-15mm lens and around F4 it performs very well with the Q. When using old K-mount lenses I found that the loss in contrast and sharpness wide open was very much pronounced with the Q than with my K-5 or GF2. Also, CA, purple fringing and diffraction gets very noticeable, so you have to be careful and do some experimenting first. Below is two sample-series with the SMC Pentax-M 50mm F1.7 and a 25mm F1.4 C-mount lens, as well as a few sample images.

A test series with the SMC Pentax-M 50mm F1.7

A test series with the Fujian 25mm F1.4 CCTV

My pictures on flickr with this camera

richard0170

Site Supporter

Registered: February, 2017

Posts: 2,034

1 user found this helpful

Review Date: March 18, 2017

Recommended | Price: $200.00 | Rating: 7

Pros:	Size,weight, form factor and functionality
Cons:	no view finder, cost
Ergonomics: 9 Build Quality: 8 User Interface: 8 Autofocus: 9 Features: 8 Value: 6 Image Quality: 6 New or Used: Used

A bit of history as to why I bought this camera new(old stock) in April 2015. I had recently come back from holiday from Italy and found the 28mm equiv lens on my GRD iv a bit limiting. I am not a fan of standard zooms, and I wanted a small light camera with a standard prime to carry around all day when on holiday, the GR in my pocket for wide shots. The only options were the Pentax Q range or MFT. Having tracked down a Q10 to play with and like the handling I found a Q with the 01 prime going for £200. I could n't afford a MFT camera with a prime. I soon added a polarising filter. Also an optical viewfinder followed as the screen as others have mentioned is not the best. Costs starting to rise!
But I love this camera. Its fun, it produces good results in good light. I have a couple of pictures blown op to 16" X 12" on my wall. Yes if you walk up to them and study them you can tell that this is the limit you would go to, and next to picture of the same size taken with my K3 the IQ is understandably not as good. At normal viewing distances for a picture this size its just fine though. I like the fact that I can put a different lens on it, the wide zoom has followed though I would have preferred Pentax to have made super-wide prime. I love the fact that it has in built sensor dust removal, especially as my GRiv suffered from dust and was not cost effective to repair.
Yes you can get more pocketable compact cameras that offer the same or better IQ and the extra versatility of a zoom, but how reliable are they with their mechanised retracting zoom lenses, is dust going to get on the sensor whilst you are on holiday and ruin your photos? This has happened to me and not just on the GRiv. I am not saying this camera is for everyone or is better than a compact but that you should consider these factors when choosing which is right for you.
A word also about its size. Yes it is small and seems to weigh nearly nothing but my big hands have no problem holding it steady. However despite what you may have read elsewhere it is not really pocketable due it being a very 3 dimensional camera with a lens attatched, unless you want to walk around with an ugly bulge in you coat or cargo pants pocket, and you are not too bothered about damaging it by putting it somewhere where it does not belong. Better to use a neck strap and carry it that way.
So in summary despite its limitations I think it makes really good travel camera option due to its small size and weight and good enough image quality. It wont suit everyone but everyone should have a look at the Q range and consider it before making a purchasing decision.

Fookus

Loyal Site Supporter

Registered: October, 2009

Posts: 137

1 user found this helpful

Review Date: November 27, 2012

Recommended | Price: $300.00 | Rating: 9

Pros:	size & ergonomics & fun factor
Cons:	can't compete with K5/Kx
Ergonomics: 10 Build Quality: 10 User Interface: 10 Autofocus: 6 Features: 9 Value: 10 Image Quality: 8 Noise: 8 New or Used: New

This is an excellent tool and boy toy! It's fun!

I own both the 01 and 02; in practice I use the 01 mostly, but the 02 can be used very well for wide angle views. I bought lens hoods for both of them

Compared to compacts the quality and flexibility is much better. I agree with Don Tomaso and others about the comparison with K5/Kx...and the batteries..
but...as a 2nd camera it can allways be at your service and it's of incredible value.

For example with city trips it can stay in your pocket; you just pull it out to take unexpected snapshots of what's going on around you.

I am rating it a full 9 due to it's flexibility and fun factor.

example photo's

Zifnab

New Member

Registered: February, 2016

Location: Montreal

Posts: 4

Review Date: February 17, 2016

Recommended | Price: $250.00 | Rating: 8

Pros:	very small, inexpensive, well-built
Cons:	battery life, no viewfinder, ISO
Ergonomics: 9 Build Quality: 9 User Interface: 8 Autofocus: 9 Features: 9 Value: 8 Image Quality: 8 Noise: 8 New or Used: New

This camera works well and my impression is positive. There are a lot of functionalities and modes (like a true DSLR). However, the bad thing is the noise (ISO). Do not exceed ISO 800. The battery life is average. Ok for 4-6 days, no more if you frequently use it.

I bought the official converter (Q to K-mount) and the results are amazing (see pictures).

Pentax Q + converter + Pentax DA 55-300

Pentax Q + converter + Tamron SP 90 (macro)

pentajazzz

Forum Member

Registered: September, 2013

Posts: 62

Review Date: August 26, 2014

Recommended | Price: $320.00 | Rating: 9

Pros:	like a big camera, but small.
Cons:	as all small cameras - have a little more noise and blur
Ergonomics: 9 Build Quality: 10 User Interface: 10 Autofocus: 10 Features: 9 Value: 8 Image Quality: 8 Noise: 8 New or Used: Used

very small camera, but not a "toy".
01 prime have a very fast AF, as fast as SLR can do.
02 zoom 5-15 mm slightly slower, but still fast enough.

menu and buttons almost same with K-30 DSLR, so I do not need to learn it.
hot shoe, great dials and all over controls - are best.
RAW+ option - same as DSLR
best manual focus option, just same as my LIm-lenses.
You can use or MF only mode, or "quick-shift" after AF finished to work. with magnification it works just perfect.

IQ - as all small sensor-cameras, this camera likes a more lite.
indoor I'm using remote flash GN 25-40, outdoor just need sunny day. in my country 300-320 days-a-year are much sunny, so I do not worry about

picture taken at RAW format at full resolution, with small amount of "sharp" at RAW-converter, resized to 6MP has a SAME IQ as K100 DSLR + 18-55 kit lens (!). only a dept-of-focus are different. but in many cases more DOF are better.

if You need DOF as APS-C + 50mm lens at f/5.6 just shoot with Q+01 prime at f/2.
I have a self-made optical viewfinder so playing children at sunny day are not a problem, AF is fast and precise.

I like this little camera a lot, as additional (pocket) option for gripped K-30 - it is a best.

pqx

New Member

Registered: June, 2014

Posts: 21

Review Date: June 7, 2014

Recommended | Price: $59.00 | Rating: 8

Pros:	Dslr users will feel at home
Cons:	Limited quick dial assignments
Ergonomics: 8 Build Quality: 10 User Interface: 10 Autofocus: 8 Features: 9 Value: 10 Image Quality: 6 Noise: 3 New or Used: New

I bought mine brand new for a leisurely £59.00 new, but without the kit lens.

I love the size because it gives me no excuse not to always have it with me. So going to work and coming home allows me to plan different routes just to take in new scenery and take pictures.

The camera instills usability and is very customisable via its simple menu and easy navigation system. I find i change it alot but its fast even when you mess up and reset it.

Right now i'm using D-mount and C-mount lens, with PQ-mount-Nikon lens arriving soon i'll be able to mount some nice primes from Nikon and M42 primes/zooms via an m42-nikon adapter too.

The screen terrible in bright sunny areas and you will find turning the LCD up to +7 the only viable option. This in turn along with all that processing going on drain the batteries like crazy. I got three minimum.

Its good with Jpegs so i just leave it there and shoot mostly manually unless i want to get a shot quick then Av mode.

WB in auto only goes down to 4000 kelvin so its bad to use auto in tungsten lighting cause the cast will come over too warm. I notice auto iso shoots very high iso, but manually you don't get to go so high. Meaning there's some pentax NR and other techie stuff going on, that you could not do manually.

I get allsorts of people checking it out, so its a cool camera even for kids to own and grow photography on.

Better quality exist but not with the fun that goes with owning the Q

sapporodan

Senior Member

Registered: April, 2012

Posts: 123

Review Date: March 9, 2014

Recommended | Price: $100.00 | Rating: 9

Pros:	Fun to use, well designed, solid build.
Cons:	Terrible battery life, so far not many Q lenses.
Ergonomics: 8 Build Quality: 9 User Interface: 9 Autofocus: 6 Features: 7 Value: 10 Image Quality: 8 Noise: 5 New or Used: New

When the Q came out i was intrigued, i loved the idea, but when i found out the price i never never really bothered with it. When the Q7 came out the Q was reduced to a ridiculously low price, and when I found one going new for just £60 from SRS i could not resist.

My first impression of the camera was really positive, it looks great and feel really solid. the buttons and dials are comfortable to use (and i have big hands!) the display is typical Pentax and easy to navigate.

Overall i find it a wonderful camera to use, the front dial is genius.

My only negative points are the really terrible battery life and the lack of autofocus for video.

Image quality is good, and out of all the simular sensor sized cameras i have used i think it produces the nicest results, but at the end of the day it is a tiny sensor so you cant expect it to perform miracles.

I have so far not been that impressed with the lenses, the lack of primes is worrying plus i had hoped they would have produced a native lens that zooms further than 250mm by now.

cahudson42

Inactive Account

Registered: October, 2011

Posts: 147

Review Date: January 12, 2014

Recommended | Price: $189.00 | Rating: 9

Pros:	'Perfect' as a second camera (to my K-01)
Cons:	Battery life (minor issue - they are cheap)
Ergonomics: 7 Build Quality: 10 User Interface: 9 Autofocus: 8 Features: 10 Value: 10 Image Quality: 8 Noise: 8 New or Used: New

Many good reviews below… so I will instead bring up some lesser-mentioned reasons for getting a Q – as a second camera. In short – ‘run don’t walk’ to pick one up new with the 02 lens while they are still available at $189. A fantastic bargain. Here is why I got one as my second camera…

After many years when my camera was an ES with a slew of manual M42 Takumars, and with great advice from this forum, I went with a K-01 body and genuine Pentax M42 30120 adapter, and am very happy. The focus peaking with 6x blowup is great with manual lens. K-01 will remain my primary camera for now, permanently setup for use with all my M42 Takumars.

Yet I faced an issue after getting the K-01 and setting it up for manual use. Wife wanted an autofocus/autoaperture lens. Looked at the K-01’s 18-55 kit at about $80 as I remember - plastic mount turned me off. The better one was maybe twice that... Close to $160.

Then I saw the original Q on sale with the 5-15mm for $189 ‘with bag’ - just as 6BQ5 did. Grabbed one – and really glad I did. After now a few days of use, here is what I see:

1. Menu system very much the same as K-01. No learning curve.
2. Also has Focus Peaking with latest firmware. Also Shake Reduction - also great for manuals..
3. Liked metal lens mount and built-in motor of the 02 lens.
4. Wife won't know the difference on sensor size
5. Got a great long-range telephoto camera with M42 Taks and inexpensive (V1) Fotodiox adapter. Think of it as a 4X TeleConverter for your APS-C camera lens – without the stop or as much image quality loss.
6, No messing with K-01 and the 30120 adapter to use an 18-55 autofocus lens. I leave M42 adapter on all the time.
7. Solves the wide-angle problem with using M42s on the K-01 (little available). The Q and 02 come out for that.
8. Wife and I now have a 'camera each'

All for $30 - $100 more than a K-01 18-55 autofocus lens.

I also rate the IQ maybe a bit better than some others. This as a result of comparing four different M42 Taks - SMCT 50/F1.4, ST55/F1.8, ST55/F2.0. and Macro Tak 50/F4.0. using a Fotodiox V1 adapter on the Q. I was happy with them all.

As with the K-01, the Macro Tak was sharpest with best contrast and color saturation - but the difference was not as pronounced as it seems on the K-01. The SMCT 'rubber ring' 50/1.4 was not far behind - and you do get three extra stops. The ST1.8 was marginally better in sharpness and contrast compared to the ST2.0 (could be just sample variation). I've got the SMCT 50/1.4 on the Fotodiox at this point.

Get a Q!

6BQ5

Veteran Member

Registered: June, 2013

Location: Nevada, USA

Posts: 3,348

Review Date: January 12, 2014

Recommended | Price: $189.00 | Rating: 9

Pros:	Extremely small system, ND filter, DNG, DSLR-like features
Cons:	Small sensor, top buttons too recessed
Ergonomics: 7 Build Quality: 8 User Interface: 8 Autofocus: 8 Features: 10 Value: 9 Image Quality: 6 Noise: 6 New or Used: New

The Q can be a very polarizing camera. On the one side is a group of strong advocates and on the other side is an equally strong group of detractors. I read many reviews and forum postings about the Q so I was aware of each side well before I got my own Q. Though once I got it I found myself siding with each camp, one at a time, only to betray it and go back to the other. In doing so I finally understood what the camera was really about. To truly appreciate this camera you have to love it and hate it at the same time. This creates a tension - a healthy tension - and it will push you to explore photography in ways you would not have been stirred to do so otherwise.

First and foremost, I believe that the Q was intended to be a creative JPG output camera. This becomes clear when you travel through the menus and see the plethora of color schemes and picture presets. I know lots of people enjoy playing around with these sorts of “digital filters” on isolated devices (vs. their desktop computers). You find yourself on a little tiny island with few, if any, distractions and this allows you to focus your attention. Many point and shoot cameras have the same processing capabilities. So what sets the Q apart from them? It’s the lenses. Digital effects can only go so far in the creative process. Swapping lenses adds a physical, tactile, and analog dimension to the creative process of photography. This is no more evident than by the lenses themselves. Rather than concentrate on creating a line of consisting only of pin-point sharp lenses Pentax took on the complete opposite approach. They created a line of lenses that can also distort and blur - with manual focus only capabilities in some cases. This is a stroke of genius in my mind. These kinds of lenses not only open up new graphic capabilities that would be beyond the beginner to implement in post processing but they also open up new avenues of creativity for the avid user to explore. Give a person a pencil and they will draw one way. Then give them a crayon and watch them draw the same thing completely different or maybe even draw something complete different altogether! The combination of analog effects through lenses and digital effects through color schemes and presets opens up a whole world of creativity that can appeal to both beginner and expert artist alike.

Pentax seemingly (and wisely) reused a lot of their user interface design from their DSLRs. Doing so opened up and allowed for features that suit the detractors. The Q can output raw DNG files, shoot in more advanced modes like Av, offer exposure bracketing, exposure stacking, HDR, and the list goes on and on. In one of my threads somewhere here on the Pentax Forum I heard a fellow member refer to the Q as a mini mirrorless DSLR. I would have to wholeheartedly agree with that description. In creating this camera Pentax opened themselves up to this group of people who at first would be intrigued and then disappointed. They look at this camera and see a tiny sensor that will inherently have a low S/N ratio, limited dynamic range, poor detail rendering, and suffer the effects of diffraction and optical aberrations due to the laws of physics. Pixel peeping will reveal what many would consider defects in the image. Color shift, softness, and poor subject isolation are common complaints. I found myself doing my own pixel peeping and I can confirm all of this. It’s compounded when you come from the world of high quality DSLRs with large sensors and excellent optics that have set your standards and expectations very high. All these qualities would all be excusable in a similarly sized point and shoot because it costs much less than a Q and simply because it would be a point and shoot camera.

Had none of this been made available then that group of people would never be attracted to a camera that they would then try to detract others. It’s easy to wonder why Pentax would design the Q and make it so powerful. Why open up the engine for such advanced use? Again, I see this as another path for creativity designed to suit the more advanced post-processing shooter. I am one of these shooters and I personally don’t care much for in-camera image processing. It’s easy enough for me to shoot in raw DNG and do my own processing. I can tailor each shot to what I think is the best processing scheme vs. a more generic algorithm in the camera.

Continuing, I bought this camera not for the effects and processing but for its form factor and almost absolute silent operation. This camera is absolutely tiny - even with a lens. There are many other small ILCs but with their much larger sensors they end up needing much larger lenses than the Q. They end up having a small body with a disproportionately large lens. It looks awkward. Not here. The Q is just right. Everything is small enough to be fit in a coat pocket while offering superior performance over a similarly sized point and shoot camera. I can take this camera where I would not take my DSLR. Pulling out a DSLR or any other similarly sized camera attracts a lot of attention and the mechanisms make plenty of noise. The Q allows you to operate like a ninja in stealth mode. All anyone would possibly hear (if anything) is the very quiet clicking sound of the aperture closing down. Being so small also allows for steady hand holding of the camera. It fits neatly in your palm and you can easily wrap both hands around the entire assembly. The built in shake reduction combined with a good steady hold gives a surprising amount of stability. I think most people would be challenged to find a similarly sized point and shoot camera in the same form factor that offers the same optical versatility and raw DNG output capability as the Q.

Remember, this camera is not about photographing the grand landscape or the soft dreamy backlit portrait. Pentax makes a fine line of DSLRs for that. This camera is something that Henri Cartier-Bresson would pull out to catch that decisive moment and capture the feeling of the here and now. The Q asks you what can you photograph right now to record the pulse of today without anyone asking questions.

Philosophy aside, it’s a marvel that Pentax packed in as much as they did in such a small body. Think about the engineering origami Pentax worked through to fit shake reduction, a pop-up flash, a metal lens mount, a LCD, a battery, etc etc in this wallet sized camera. I can understand why some people feel like the ergonomics are difficult. Personally, I have problems with the on/off and play buttons on the top of the camera being too recessed. Everything else feels fine.

The UI is typical of modern Pentax cameras with a tabbed menu system which is easy enough to maneuver through with the 4-way keypad. If you used a Pentax DSLR then the features should be familiar to you. The only thing lacking is a second wheel that can be used to change ISO or another similar setting without going through a menu. Autofocus is quick, silent, and accurate. The contrast based AF method here is faster than what my K-30 can do.

Perhaps the biggest challenge facing any photographer, but maybe DSLR users the most, is learning the lenses and the sensor. The “f/8 it and forget it” guideline gets tossed out the window. For ultimate sharpness you need to stay with wider aperture settings. Remember, with the 5.6x crop factor that f/2.8 is nearly like f/15! Achieving subject isolation is going to be difficult unless you can get real close. Bokeh will be so-so but, again, that’s not what this camera is made for. Sensor noise may be the camera's other achilles heel too.

At $189 with the 02 lens and a small case I think I got a good deal on a new package. Get the 01 lens if you can too. Sometimes it's easier to buy a used kit with the 01 and a Q body in it vs. buying the 01 separately. Aftermarket batteries are cheap and plentiful. They provide enough juice to keep the camera going strong.

mrNewt

Veteran Member

Registered: November, 2011

Location: ON, RH

Posts: 2,181

Review Date: December 9, 2013

Recommended | Price: $303.00 | Rating: 9

Pros:	Small, light, great IQ considering the size of the sensor, versatility
Cons:	Being a small camera, ergonomics are not stellar...
Ergonomics: 7 Build Quality: 10 User Interface: 10 Autofocus: 9 Features: 8 Value: 9 Image Quality: 9 Noise: 8 New or Used: New

My Q came with the 02 lens.
Great little camera and very fun to use - I find myself snapping away at almost anything.

I was very impressed by the IQ from that tinny little sensor. I didn't find the ISO to be such a big problem as long I didn't went above 400.
What I love most is the possibility to use all type of lenses by having the corresponding adapter. So far I had the chance to play with K, m42, m39 and 110 adapters - is a fun process.
Planning to get a hold of the C mount as well.

I do recommend it as a light companion next to your bigger DSLR or as a beginner's camera.

Page 1 of 2

⟶