Originally posted by Digitalis The M9 isn't a great performaer as far as High iso is concerned, the k7 has a quieter shutter and it is able to be used with studio strobes without you ending up with a synch cable hitting you on your forehead.
sure Leica have some fantastic lenses, I own many of their greatest lenses and I enjoy using them. I'll point out to you that the pentax 43mm f/1.9* matches the summilux 50mm f/1.4 at f/2.8 I'd say the 43's bokeh is superior. In any case the 43 beats the voigtlander ultron 40mm f/1.4 at the same aperture.
*I own the M-mount version in silver, I wish Pentax made the 77mm and the 31mm in Leica M mount, that would certainly make leica photographers sit up and pay attention...
I'm not really concerned about high iso quality of the Leica M8 or M9. From what I've seen it's good enough for me. What I like is the extemely small lenses and also camera size and great IQ you get.
As far as 43mm f/1.9* matching summilux 50mm, do you mean the latest aspherical version or the previous version? I know for a fact that the 43mm is a very sharp lens as I have it in Pentax, but what I'm fascinated about is the colors from the Leica lenses. I'm pretty sure it's the lens and not the camera as I don't see the same rendering with Voigtlander lenses for Leica.
I like the rendering of the FA Limited better than any other SLR lens, but the rendering ffrom Leica is different, kind of warmer but still with unique colorful look.
Originally posted by kevinschoenmakers How much of what you're seeing is the M9's fullframe sensor and good PP, and how much is really because of the lenses' IQ?
It's hard to say, but in most Leica photos made by different photographers I see the same Leica rendering, so I don't think I'm fooled by someones PP skills.
Looking at this thread is an example of what I like about Leica rendering. You tell me if it's a PP thing:
35 Summilux Aspherical in Iran ..... (imgs): Leica Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review.
Originally posted by Henrik Kristensen I don't mean to bad-mouth Leica, they are fantastic but...
Is this perhaps just another case of "grass is always greener..." ?
In 98% of the shots, would for example DA 15, FA 31 & FA 77 not give you just about the same result (a lot depend on PP anyway) ??
I too would love a small Leica and their great lenses, but I honestly don't think it would change much in my pictures
I have the Leica R Summicron 50mm and the color rendering is completely different when I compare it against my other Pentax and non-Pentax 50s.
I don't think PP can achieve a Leica look. At least I don't know how. The below thread shows what I mean:
35 Summilux Aspherical in Iran ..... (imgs): Leica Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review
Last edited by Voe; 05-23-2010 at 08:03 AM.