Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-13-2010, 04:40 PM   #1
Veteran Member
Reportage's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 739
[DA 50-135mm f/2.8] Do you miss the the extra 65mm from a 70-200mm f/2.8 range?

as above.

06-13-2010, 04:45 PM   #2
Veteran Member
Lloydy's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 1,114
No, I have the range above the 50-135 covered by old slow manual focus stuff, which if I need it works ok.

But the 50-135 is superb in its range, I use it more and more as a walkabout lens, and have never felt disappointed that 135mm is the max.
06-13-2010, 05:50 PM   #3
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Lowell Goudge's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 16,693
I think this is more a question relating to what people shoot, and the need for telephoto.

I have always shot wild life so I welcome the extra apparent reach achieved with a cropped sensor on a 70-200 F2.8, compared to when I shot film, But if I were not that interested in wild life perhaps I would find the 50-135 adequate., I just spend too mucch time at 200mm and F2.8
06-13-2010, 06:56 PM   #4
SpecialK's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: So California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,249
As Lowell pointed out, it sort of depends on what you shoot, right?

06-13-2010, 07:20 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Reportage's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 739
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by SpecialK Quote
As Lowell pointed out, it sort of depends on what you shoot, right?
i see. In that case the 50-135 is out for me.
06-13-2010, 08:08 PM   #6
Veteran Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,054
Well, I would certainly like to have that extra 65mm, but not enough to have to deal with all that extra weight and size. I shoot a lot of puppies (because I'm a cruel bastard!) and there are definitely times that the extra 65mm would come in handy. I have a big Sigma for when I really need some reach, but I just don't want to have to carry around a lens that's almost that big for times when I need to be quick and agile. Aww, who am I kidding? I haven't been quick and agile since before I could afford all this gear.
06-13-2010, 09:49 PM   #7
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Canada_Rockies's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sparwood, BC, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 12,066
No, I do not.

QuoteOriginally posted by Reportage Quote
as above.
As a matter of fact, this weekend it passed through my mind that if I were using my former A 70-210, that I would not have been able to capture some images. The 70-210 was, for me, the ideal lens for sporting events. On APS-C, again for me, it just did not work. It was too long at the short end, and I did not use the long end enough to worry about crop problems with only 135mm.

Of course, now that I have the F 1.7X AF rear converter, I also have a 85-230 f/4.8 lens with AF to fine tune rough MF shifting, so I have the best of both worlds. Besides, my daughter has the A 70-210 to go along with the 18-55 she got with her K200d. Daddy got kudos for that gift! (Daddy cheated - he lent it to her for a day and watched).
06-14-2010, 06:35 AM   #8
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 50,062
Yes. 135mm is a bit short.

Adam Webmaster (Site Usage Guide | Site Help | My Photography) server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover these costs by donating. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, KEH, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:


  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
da 50-135mm, f/2.8, k-mount, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Super Takumar 135mm & 200mm, Vivitar 135mm, SMC 28mm MSM Sold Items 24 06-13-2010 09:55 PM
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 vs. Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 vs Pentax 50-135mm f/2.8 nah Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 27 12-08-2008 01:03 AM
Mid Range Zoom - Tamron 24-135mm or Pentax F 35-135mm? Khukri Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 0 06-26-2007 02:02 AM
For Sale - Sold: Make Offers: Haminex 135mm f/2.8, Sears 135mm f/2.8, Super Albinar 100-200mm f inneyeseakay Sold Items 1 06-23-2007 02:05 AM
Extra! Extra! My latest blog inside! bdavis General Talk 7 06-09-2007 05:25 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]