Originally posted by Pentaxor I don't think it's about sample variation. most, if not all people who had tried and owned both lenses could testify that the 1.7 is sharper than the 1.4. itis not even a 50/50 nor an 80/20 ratio, but more of a 98% to 2% ratio. also, I believe it has the resolution tests and mathematical statistics to support that. so the lens design have to do something with it.
as far as your copy is concerned. maybe you just got a dud or it has some issues that you are not aware of.
I just did an 'oblique newspaper' test with my M1.4 and M1.7 (which avoids focus issues) and came to the conclusion that the difference is much less than I had always assumed - in fact negligible in practice, and even that difference is counteracted by the application of a tiny amount of sharpening in PP. It's been said before, but I believe it's true, that much of the alleged unsharpness of the 1.4 wide open is a consequence of focusing inaccuracy.
My K1.2 got stolen - I would get another like a shot if I could find one at the price I paid last time.
Tim