You mixed a bit (or misunderstood) what I said. I'll try to be clearer.
"Enlarge factors" :
- 6x7 format : 2
- 6x6 format : 1,8
Crop factor of APS-C format : 1,5
It means that you need a lens 2 times longer on 6x7 (or 1,8 times on 6x6) than on 2'x36 to get the same angle of view (and the lens only needs to be 2/1,8 times slower to get the same dof, for the same reproduction ratio obviously). As the APS-C is smaller than 24x36, you need a lens 1,5 times shorter than on 24x36 to get the same angle of view (and 1,5 times faster to get the same dof). These figures can be combinated : crop factor between APS-C and 6x6 is 1,8x1,5=2,7, which means your 85mm lens on APS-C will act as a 85x2,7=230mm lens would to on 6x6 format. And to equal (in terms on angle of view) a 80mm lens on 6x6 with an APS-C body, you need a 80/2,7=29mm lens (it is normal : 80mm is the stand focal lengh on 6x6 while 29mm is around normal focal lengh on APS-C too).
Edit : to answer about the 180/2.8. As we said, it will still transmit f/2.8. It will remain a 180mm lens (so with a DA 50-200 @180mm, you would have the same angle of view), but you will have the same angle of view of a 180x1,5=270mm lens would have on 24x36, or the same angle of view a 180x2,7=486mm lens (almost 500mm) would have on 6x6 format.
Don't bother with focal lengh and formats. If you know that your 85mm Takumar is enough for you in terms of angle of you, any ~85ish lens, whatever format it is designed for, would do it.
Bonus : A Pentacon 500/5.6 on 6x6 would have approximatively the same angle of view than a 180mm lens would have on APS-C. But in matter of dof, the lens on 6x6 format would be an equivalent of f/5.6/2,7= f/2. So if you use a 500/5.6 @f/5.6 on 6x6, you have a narrower dof than with a 180/2.8 @f/2.8 lens on APS-C, despite you have the same angle of view and despite one is 2 times slower than the other