Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
07-24-2010, 06:50 PM   #1
Junior Member

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 30
long fast zooms WHY???

I really want to purchase a longish fast zoom for my K-x.

The Pentax 50-135mm has SDM issues
The Sigma 70-200mm HSM has front focus and macro issues
The Tamron 70-200mm has sticky aperture problems!!!

WHY can't one of them be reliable and have no damn issues?

07-24-2010, 06:57 PM   #2
Inactive Account

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,484
Because if human involvement in the manufacturing process.

For what it's worth, none of my 4 SDM (DA*) lenses have issues.

Last edited by JeffJS; 07-30-2010 at 08:51 PM.
07-24-2010, 07:09 PM   #3
Site Supporter
SpecialK's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: So California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 14,906
My Tamron 70-200 is fine.
07-24-2010, 07:28 PM   #4
Veteran Member
Derridale's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 412
Yup - bit of a generalisation there....

I have DA* 50-135mm, the Tamron 70-200mm, Sigma 100-300mm, and none of these has any problems.

I'd suggest trying them out in the store first, or if ordering online, then take the chance, and return if not right.

07-24-2010, 09:45 PM   #5
Marc Sabatella's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 10,686
Every complex product ever made has *someone* in the world *somewhere* who has had an issue with it. The Internet makes it easy to scare oneself with others' reports, but you should really keep things in perspective. There are far more happy than unhappy owners of all the aforementioned lenses.

Last edited by Marc Sabatella; 07-25-2010 at 04:10 PM.
07-25-2010, 02:56 AM   #6
Moderator PEG Judges
Kerrowdown's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Highlands of Scotland.
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 32,804
Zoom problems, fix 'em overnight, get a fast prime instead.
07-25-2010, 04:56 AM   #7
Community Manager
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,695
Tamron's sticky aperture issue is fixable. But the lens itself to me can't be beat.
The 50-135 doesn't have as many SDM issues as you might think. It really is a brilliant lens.
07-30-2010, 08:29 PM   #8
Veteran Member
Mechan1k's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,891
Another good lens .... with little issues that I have heard of is the Sigma 100-300 f/4

If i had the $$$$$ ... it'd be either the Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 or the Sigma 100-300 f/4

07-31-2010, 12:39 PM   #9
Senior Member
jslifoaw's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto/Victoria
Posts: 262
The older Sigma 70-200 non-macro was very good and so is the FA* 80-200.

Cost and/or availability are issues for both
07-31-2010, 12:45 PM   #10
Veteran Member
Asahiflex's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,754
The older the better, hence why I bought a FA* 80-200. Back then no-one knew about focusing errors and SDM problems, so the FA* does not have either.l
07-31-2010, 01:37 PM   #11
Site Supporter
wtlwdwgn's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Billings, MT
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,333
I bought my DA* lenses at their introduction and the 1st copies did fail but the ones I have now are perfect, sharp, fast, and quiet. It looks like Pentax is getting their QC up to snuff. I can also vouch for the Sigma 100-300 f/4. It's also a very sharp lens.
07-31-2010, 06:17 PM   #12
Veteran Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 384
I have the DA*s 16-50 and 50-135

They are gorgrous lenses and have never failed me :ugh:

I have bro Jslifoaw's copy of the 1st generation Sigma 70-200 for coming to 2 years now and even fellow Pentax user friends can't keep their eyes off the shots taken with it
07-31-2010, 07:30 PM   #13
Junior Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 27
All three of those lenses are reliable, sharp, and very high quality... You couldn't go wrong with either.
07-31-2010, 08:15 PM   #14
Veteran Member
RioRico's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Limbo, California
Posts: 11,264
The good news: All the lenses mentioned are excellent. All can produce good images when used right.

The not-so-good news: Higher quality glass does not make one a better photographer. Those interested in superlative IQ should just dump all this Pentax junk, mortgage their homes, and buy Leica. Those interested in superior photography should learn to get the most from what they have.

The reality: Sharpness comes from slower lenses, not faster ones. I'm not into birds, but my best bird shots came with an M42 Tele-Takumar 200/5.6 (US$29) and a FA100-300/4.7-5.8 (US$121). Yes, I too lust after fast zooms; my best now is the M42 Vivitar Series 1 Version 1 70-210/3.5 (US$33) but it's usually stopped down to f/5.6. Would I turn down an AF 70-200/2 lens if offered to me? Hell no! But I'll have to wait for the next inheritance before I buy one.

The ray of light: Excellent manual glass, 1 f-stop slower, can be had for pennies now. (Well, maybe a couple of jars full of pennies.) My Takumar-A 70-200, and three Ricoh-made zooms in the 70-210 range, all f/4, each cost me US$9. That Vivitar is a heavy beast at 880g, but can still be had for well under US$100. Ask yourself: Just how much are AF and 1 f-stop worth?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Footnote: If Ira sees this, I expect him to quote the line "learn to get the most from what they have" and ask, "And that's why you have a zillion lenses?" And my reply is, "No, I have a zillion lenses because I'm manic, and they were mostly cheap, and I'm experimenting; yes, that's my story and I'll stick with it." The last couple days, I've been shooting with a medium-format lens, a Wollensak Enlarging Raptar 162/4.5, on a macro bellows, using it for general photography. It takes a bit of concentration. It needs a tripod, really. Most of my shots are failures. That's how I learn. Now I'm looking for some cheap-sh!t ancient 6x9 folders that I can tear apart for their 110-130mm cruddy uncoated uncorrected lenses, to see what effects they'll produce. I'll pay as much as US$5 for those. More learning experiences, eh?

Last edited by RioRico; 07-31-2010 at 08:24 PM.
08-01-2010, 04:07 AM   #15
Community Manager
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,695
There's more to lens quality than just 'one-stop difference' between lenses though RioRico - I assume you took that into consideration.

Plus the added speed (f/2.8 or f/4 vs f/5.6) can make the difference between handholding/freezing motion and not.

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
70-200mm, issues, k-mount, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fast zooms on the new pentax redpigeons Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 2 04-27-2009 06:01 PM
pick two long,fast,light txsbluesguy Photographic Technique 13 04-21-2009 08:49 PM
Need Help: Looking for long, fast glass Tbear Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 11 09-05-2007 05:23 AM
Thoughts on TC's and long zooms Richard Day Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 11 08-15-2007 05:41 AM
Dillema: Buy Primes or Zooms? - Long davek Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 15 03-30-2007 07:20 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:54 PM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]