Originally posted by rustynail925 However I notice the distortion of the Sigma @16mm is worse than the DA16-45.
That is what I would expect. The DA16-45 is an excellent lens, in terms of IQ. However, in a crowded city I would miss the wider range below 16mm a lot more than I would the mid-range, which I would cover with a prime (or two) in any case.
In fact, I have been happy on some trips with covering 12-24mm and 105mm
only. Though, given the size, there is rally no reason not to have a Limited prime or fast 50 in a pocket to fill the middle.
Originally posted by rustynail925 I was thinking of that too but The flexibility and the weight of the DAL 50-200 is hard to beat
Except by the DA55-300.
I am not much of a tele guy, and on my last trip missed having something over 105mm only when we spotted some white-tailed eagles. But I really don't sweat getting
every shot. I prefer to make the most of those I can get.