Originally posted by Asahiflex You all are looking too much at the specs. Because in real life, in the same low lighting situation, the K-r + DA 35/2.4 will still give sharp photos handheld whereas a photo made with for instance the Nikon with 35/1.8 will only deliver blurry pictures.
I'd choose sharp pictures above blurry pictures
Yes, I'm aware that we haven't seen a single test image yet but you're also dreaming about the image quality here. The Nikon 35/1.8 is plenty sharp wide open, so is the Canon 50/1.8. I doubt the DA 35/2.4 is THAT much better than I'm willing to trade the extra stop for the extra sharpness.
Nikkor AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G - Review / Test Report - Analysis
A center sharpness of 2027 at f1.8 WIDE OPEN for the Nikon 35/1.8 is very good. I doubt the Pentax DA 35/2.4 will score much higher. The Pentax DA Ltd 35/2.8 Macro only scored 2029.5 at f2.8. It was only 2.5 points higher while a stop and a half slower compared to the Nikon 35/1.8.
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II - Review / Test Report - Analysis
The Canon 50/1.8 is slightly disappointing at 1690 at f1.8 but it's still respectable. By f2.8, it is 1949, less than 100 points behind the DA 35 LTD!
I doubt the 35/2.4 will have superior image quality compared to the DA 35 LTD 2.8. So yeah, this is pretty disappointing.