Originally posted by egordon99 Sean, if you get one of the Zeiss's, I want to check it out! Still owe you lunch in Phoenixville, Molly McGuire's (sp?) is supposed to be open this month, so if you're tired of Iron Hill
I won't be getting the Zeiss 85. After the Photozone review of the ZF version I lost all interest and went after the Pentax FA* 85. After spending some time with a friend's ZF 85, the Pentax, it turns out, is a much better lens. The ZF isn't as bad as the copy Klaus reviewed, but the FA* is just something out of this world.
The Zeiss 25mm looks interesting, as do the Zeiss macro lenses. They're a bit pricey though, and since I also own several quite decent 24mm lenses I'm not sure there is room for the 25mm in my bag. The FA* 24/2 is fast and sharp but suffers from some CA (not anything to cry about though) and the A 24/2.8 is also tack sharp with no CA at all. (The S-M-C Takumar 24/3.5 is a stellar performer for neither sharpness nor CA, but is reasonable at f/5.6 and smaller.)
I'm also still on the fence as to the Voigtlander 125mm macro, it certainly seems to be a bargain compared to the Zeiss prices.
I do hope the Zeiss line sells well, perhaps it will nudge Pentax to understand that there is a market for high-end glass even without a 'pro' camera.