Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
10-27-2010, 11:51 PM   #16
New Member

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 16
Original Poster
I got it for AUD $460 shipped. Pretty good price I reckon. Yet to receive it so can't comment on condition, but if it is as the seller puts it, it should be perfect..

10-28-2010, 02:01 AM   #17
Veteran Member

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Budapest
Posts: 821
QuoteOriginally posted by DanielT74 Quote
I've had the Tamron 17-50/2.8 and now have Pentax 17-70/4.
I'm now considering to do the opposite: replace my DA 17-70 with Tamron 17-50

QuoteOriginally posted by GerryL Quote
I also have the same dilemma and would also want to upgrade.
I had the same dilemma last year. The longer tele end of 17-70 was very nice and useful for portraits, on the other hand f/2.8 of the Tamron was also very desired. After a lot of contemplation I bought 17-70 because at that time the longer range seemed to be more important. Now I have the dilemma of replacing 17-70 with 17-50, because now one stop advantage and faster (and reliable) focusing seems more important to me than the extra 20mm at the tele end I borrowed and tried a fellow pentaxian's 17-50 for a long weekend and found it to be a fine lens.

Now with the new bodies having amazing high ISO capability, this one stop advantage doesn't matter as much as before and f/4 can be sufficient in low light. I haven't noticed too much difference in bokeh or subject isolation between the two lens in the 17-50 range when used indoors (smaller rooms), but of course this depends on the shooting circumstances (subject and background distances, etc).

In my experience pros of the Tamron:
- one stop faster (may not matter that much, see previous section)
- faster focusing
- cheaper (at least here)
- may come with longer warranty, depending on location of purchase

Pros of DA 17-70
- longer range, 70mm end is good for portraits
- silent SDM focusing
- very good IQ even wide open (took 95% of my photos wide open with it)

The best would be a good DA 17-70 f/2.8, I guess If you want best of both and don't mind losing the wide end (i.e. you already have a wide angle lens or you don't need wide angle) then Tamron 28-75 is the way to go

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
16-45mm, 17-50mm, k-mount, pentax, pentax lens, slr lens, tamron, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DA 16-45mm vs. DA 17-70mm raymeedc Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 4 05-08-2010 08:25 AM
16-45mm or 17-70mm Uncle_dad Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10 01-25-2010 10:52 AM
16-45mm or 16-50mm or 17-70mm ? Neducati Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 23 12-08-2008 12:20 PM
sigma DC 17-70mm vs. Pentax DA 16-45mm Edvinas Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 2 11-19-2006 10:48 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:41 PM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]