Originally posted by Docrwm I'm well aware of the new experiences through Macro. Problem is not everyone isc into it and you're comparing New (2.4) and Used (2.8 macro) prices - sort of unfair comparison. Also, I keep hearing that the Macro is great for Macro shots but soft for normal photographs.
Simply not true. The DA35 does quite nicely both close up and at distance. IMO, a great walk around lens.
Originally posted by NeverSatisfied Definitely a great choice but I think the days are numbered to find one of these for less than $400, sale prices seem to be rising steadily.
Originally posted by GeneV I like my FA35/2 very much but I haven't seen one for less than $400 in a long time. In fact, they are more like $500 or $600 on Ebay.
The 3 most recent ones on ebay went for $300-$365. A little further back someone was willing to pay $395 for one. The FA35 gained cult status as soon as it went out of production. It's a nice lens and I'm on my second copy but I've never understood why it was Just a 35mm before it went OOP, and after, it was the greatest thing Pentax ever produced (with sometimes prices to match that status even before the 2009 price jump). The Asking price keeps going up but I don't see anyone paying it. There is a threshold that I don't think even the craziest most desperate buyer will cross. $400 seems to be it in most cases (there's always an exception
).
The both blow the budget however, so if the DA35 f2.4 is a workable solution, enjoy it and show us what it can do.