Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
11-24-2010, 01:44 PM   #1
Junior Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Photos: Albums
Posts: 44
IQ DA-55-300mm vs A-35-105mm f3.5

Does anyone have experience with both lenses, how does the IQ compare?

I have a chance to buy the A series 35-105 f3.5, which from the reviews sounds like an amazing lens. I am also planing on purchasing a the 55-300 f4 eventually to get me up to 300mm range. I am just not sure if I can justify buying the 35-105 if the 55-300 is covers the range and has roughly the same IQ. Yes, the 35-105 is a little faster (f3.5 vs f4) but that's not a huge concern for me.

Opinions folks?


11-24-2010, 02:55 PM   #2
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
blackcloudbrew's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cotati, California USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,903
I've owned both of these lenses and I'd never think of rating them against each other nor using one versus the other. They are just different lenses. To me, the DA 55-300 was my last stop in this range of telephoto zooms. I went through the DA 50-200, a Tamron 70-300, and a FAJ 80-300?, a A-200 f4 and a few others looking for a decent modern tele zoom. Short of the DA*60-250, the DA 55-300 is tops.

OTOH, the A-35-105(sort of a macro too as I recall), was really more of a mid range manual focus zoom. It was my first Pentax A lenses and I've found them (I have more now) to be really excellent quality and are only missing AF to make them perfect with a DSLR. It's kinda heavy but it's buttery smooth focusing (or at least mine was). It too is very sharp and I believe a tad sharper than the DA 55-300. Ultimately I traded it for partial payment of a DA 12-24, not because I didn't like it but because I really found that range covered by other lenses I had.

Not knowing what other lenses you may own, you'll have to decide what kind of coverage you need. With an APS-C sensor, the 35-105 length just wasn't that useful to me. The DA 55-300 comes out when I want to get close to something like wildlife. The 35-105 doesn't have that range and was sorta useful in walk around shooting in daylight but not as useful as my DA 17-70 f4 is.

11-25-2010, 01:06 AM   #3
Site Supporter
Site Supporter

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 399
I have both. I like the 35-105 for indoor shots, and as a decent walkabout / macro lens. The 55-300 is excellent for wildlife, especially on APS-C.

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
f3.5, f4, iq, k-mount, pentax lens, range, slr lens, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Sigma 100-300mm f4 & 105mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 17-50mm Fl_Gulfer Sold Items 9 10-27-2010 10:56 AM
For Sale - Sold: Nikon Kit for Sale: D90 w/ 18-105mm, 70-300mm VR, and 35mm 1.8G (US) Rich_A Sold Items 6 03-31-2010 11:58 AM
For Sale - Sold: Lester A. Dine 105mm Macro, Tamron 28-300mm, Extension Tubes, TC Votesh Sold Items 6 02-01-2009 05:31 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:07 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]