Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-26-2007, 07:35 AM   #1
Junior Member
stoo23's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30
M42 f2.5 135 vs f3.5 135

Hi,

I have been offered a Super Multi Coated f2.5 135mm Lens that is in Pretty good shape.

Now I already Own an f3,5 version of the lens and am Pretty happy with it,..in Fact it is a damn GOOD lens,..even wide open!

Just wondering what peoples thoughts are on the matter, if anyone has owned both!

faster IS Nicer,..but Not unless it Performs Optically better!

I had heard WIDE open, the f3.5 was better, so perhaps the differences are small, Unless ofcourse the 2.5 has unique optics.

cheers

09-26-2007, 07:45 AM   #2
Senior Member




Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 195
Watching

Interested to hear the responses also, as I'm considering these two lenses.
09-26-2007, 08:17 AM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,420
The Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 135/2.5 is one of my favorite lenses at all. It is good in every way, with great out of focus rendering and low CA. I sometimes hear criticisms that it isn't sharp, but this is compared to other 135s that IMO don't handle the out-of-focus areas well. My copy is as sharp as I want, I am guessing it is still out-resolving the sensor in the K10.

The 135/3.5 lenses are also good, but I give a slight edge in every aspect except size/weight to the f/2.5.
10-08-2007, 01:13 AM   #4
Site Supporter




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 86
I don't know whether the M42-Super-Tak is optically the same as the K-version.
In 1980 the german ColorFoto made a test of all 135mm lenses including these 2 Pentax-lenses.
The 3.5 has a very constant quality throughout the whole picture range.
The 2.5 is sharper in the center but has a little fall-off to the corners.
I suspect that the region where the 2.5 is weaker than the 3.5 are not visible on dslr.
Otherwise...
- yes, I have both lenses (in K-mount)-
they are different in their characteristics!

AND:
The K 2.5 is even better built!

But resolution-wise it is not a superb lens that is better than new zoom-lenses! But colour and vignetting and distortion are by far better... of course!

Oh yes - I will continue using both lenses for different things.
The K 2.5 a little bit too heavy for walking around - that's where the 3.5 is my lens.
The 2.5 is used for indoor sports and (sometimes) portraits.
- oh yes: The 2.5 is VERY usable wide opened!

On film-slr I compared it with the A* 1.8/135 and the Tokina AT-X 2.8/80-200:

At 2.5 the K was close to the A* at 2.8 (better than the A* at 1.8) and far better than the Tokina at 2.8!

:-) Paul

10-12-2007, 06:00 AM   #5
Junior Member
stoo23's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30
Original Poster
Thanks for that,..I decided against it, as to be Honest, I Really am Looking for an 85 or 105, Especially, as My f3.5 Super Multi Coated, is Really an absolutely Lovely example! I AM Extremely Happy with My lens and always have been,..it's often just Nice to have that Extra bit of Speed. lol

I'd have to go and get a Whole Bunch of Larger Filters Then as Well !!,..lol

10-12-2007, 09:05 AM   #6
Senior Member
Big Dawg's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thach, Alabama
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 169
If you can find a Vivitar Series 1 105mm f/2.5 lens. The quality is superp and it is a true 1:1 macro as well. They are P/KA mount lens and other than the lack of auto focus one of the best lens ever made.

Dawg
10-13-2007, 02:26 AM   #7
Veteran Member
David's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sandy Bay, Tasmania, Australia
Photos: Albums
Posts: 344
Photozone have a test of the SMC 135mm f2.5 here PhotoZone It rates well. I have one and really like it on both film and digital bodies.

David
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
f2.5, f3.5, k-mount, lens, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chinon 135 & Chinar 135 , Good Bad or Ugly seacapt Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 1 02-26-2010 09:03 PM
Hanimar 135 M42 marlon Post Your Photos! 2 10-14-2008 03:04 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:02 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top