Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-11-2010, 03:45 PM   #16

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: singapore
Posts: 460
Original Poster
This question has been bugging me for sometime now, especially with the recent release of lens such as the DA 35 f/2.4 ( when compared to FA 35 f/2 ) and DA 18 - 135 , type of lens.

Fellow Pentaxians, it is great to read the great insights generously contributed by everyone.

12-11-2010, 04:05 PM   #17
Veteran Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,994
QuoteOriginally posted by paperbag846 Quote
I don't like to think of it this way. Even with an amazing shot... PP can help create the proper mood that the shot deserves to give it it's extra kick. I think a little PP goes a long way on evn the best shots.

Just don't overdo it .
Yes, couldn't agree more. This has made a huge difference in my images these last few months. I am finally learning how to bring out the best in a given photo through PP. Sometimes, even in a seemingly ordinary photo, there is a gem waiting to be discovered. Skillful, yet unobtrusive PP is as much a part of digital photography as is the camera itself (or the user), IMO. This forum has been an invaluable tool in helping me to learn these skills. I just wish Keitha McCall hung out over here more. To me, she is about the best there is at PP. Her images are nothing short of awesome.
12-11-2010, 08:06 PM   #18
Site Supporter
SpecialK's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: So California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 14,913
Image processing may help you create images from nothing, but it doesn't help you capture images. Do you want to be outside taking pictures or do you want to sit inside fixing shots?
Why do you think PP means fixing rather than enhancing?
Do you want to master the camera, or master the image?
12-12-2010, 01:09 AM   #19
Veteran Member
Laurentiu Cristofor's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: WA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,044
QuoteOriginally posted by SpecialK Quote
Why do you think PP means fixing rather than enhancing?
I don't. If you look at my answer again, you will see I was answering the OP question and I was referring to the specific PP needed to compensate the use of a slower lens.

So, if you're doing the PP to make the blur of a 2.8 lens look like it's coming from a 1.4 lens, then you're fixing, not enhancing. You should have used a 1.4 lens in the first place, so you could just spend your indoors time enhancing the results you got from it.


  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
f/2.8, fa, k-mount, lens, pentax lens, post, processing, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lens Correction: 15mm DA Limited (in-camera Pentax Kx processing or post-processing?) ADHWJC Digital Processing, Software, and Printing 10 11-29-2010 08:11 PM
Lens or sharpening post-processing yusuf Photographic Technique 11 06-10-2010 01:30 PM
In LR2.6 How can i have the best Jpeg quality after processing rustynail925 Digital Processing, Software, and Printing 1 04-23-2010 04:18 AM
Post processing - particularly lens correction GingerBeer Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 7 01-25-2010 05:56 PM
A try at Post Processing JLou Post Your Photos! 3 07-02-2007 01:35 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:31 PM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]