Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-26-2010, 08:05 PM   #1
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,006
Question for the 50mm prime experts - K50 vs M50

Hi all, I've got a question for you experts on the 50mm f1.4 lenses.

Which is worth more, the K50/1.4 or the M50/1.4? I have both and I am thinking on unloading one of them.

The optical performance of both is about the same in normal day-to-day use. The optical formula is pretty much the same for both. Both have Pentax's SMC coatings. They both focus down to 0.45 feet. Both are solid metal and glass and are equally built to a level of quality you don't see anymore.

The K50/1.4 is a bit bigger and is less common than the M50/1.4. The K takes 52mm threads, the M is 49mm. These are really minor differences between these 2 gems.

So what say you? Thanks in advance.

12-26-2010, 08:28 PM   #2
Veteran Member
dgaies's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maryland / Washington DC
Posts: 3,917
QuoteOriginally posted by tranq78 Quote
Hi all, I've got a question for you experts on the 50mm f1.4 lenses.

Which is worth more, the K50/1.4 or the M50/1.4? I have both and I am thinking on unloading one of them.

The optical performance of both is about the same in normal day-to-day use. The optical formula is pretty much the same for both. Both have Pentax's SMC coatings. They both focus down to 0.45 feet. Both are solid metal and glass and are equally built to a level of quality you don't see anymore.

The K50/1.4 is a bit bigger and is less common than the M50/1.4. The K takes 52mm threads, the M is 49mm. These are really minor differences between these 2 gems.

So what say you? Thanks in advance.
Generally speaking, they're worth about the same ($75-100). If they're both in excellent condition, I would say the K50/1.4 might sell for a couple bucks more than the M50/1.4 just because they seem to come up for sale a little less often.
12-26-2010, 10:26 PM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Taiwan
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,075
Are filter sizes a consideration for you?

49mm is much more common for Pentax but if you also have several 52mm then it doesn't matter.
12-26-2010, 10:30 PM   #4
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,395
I'd keep the one that looks cooler.

12-27-2010, 06:55 AM   #5
Veteran Member
dgaies's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maryland / Washington DC
Posts: 3,917
QuoteOriginally posted by paperbag846 Quote
I'd keep the one that looks cooler.
IMO, the K series lenses all look "cooler" than the M series lenses
12-27-2010, 09:38 AM   #6
Veteran Member
macTak's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 759
In my opinion and experience, the K version sells for more than the M version. Not only is there a little more cachet for the K series in general (and they are harder to come by), but the optical design of the K version is the same as the S-M-C Takumar, which everyone loves so dearly; whereas, the optical design is slightly modified for the M. Hence the K is valued a little higher (although, as you say, there probably isn't that much difference between the two).
12-27-2010, 09:40 AM   #7
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,395
QuoteOriginally posted by macTak Quote
Hence the K is valued a little higher (although, as you say, there probably isn't that much difference between the two).
One would think that this discrepancy will grow with time as these lenses become more rare. I would keep the K if it sells for a little more.

12-27-2010, 12:28 PM   #8
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,006
Original Poster
Thanks for your replies. Another advantage of the M50 is it probably has newer and improved coatings over the K50, but this is only an educated guess on my part. I'll probably end up selling the M50 as it has the most reviews on the 'net so a buyer can get the best info on it.

Thanks again!
12-27-2010, 12:30 PM   #9
Veteran Member
macTak's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 759
QuoteOriginally posted by paperbag846 Quote
One would think that this discrepancy will grow with time as these lenses become more rare. I would keep the K if it sells for a little more.
Agreed. I also think that people simply aren't quite as aware of the K because of the paucity of them compared to the M's. All we need is someone to start some hype, and watch them take off like the 8-element Super-Takumar 50mm currently is. I too would advise keeping the K, given no other factors (such as filter size) that the OP may care about. Or you can just be crazy like me and have the Super-Takumar, S-M-C, K, M, and A 50mm f1.4 optics and be planning to sell all but one (really; I'm just too busy at the moment )
12-27-2010, 02:17 PM   #10
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,006
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by macTak Quote
Agreed. I also think that people simply aren't quite as aware of the K because of the paucity of them compared to the M's. All we need is someone to start some hype, and watch them take off like the 8-element Super-Takumar 50mm currently is. I too would advise keeping the K, given no other factors (such as filter size) that the OP may care about. Or you can just be crazy like me and have the Super-Takumar, S-M-C, K, M, and A 50mm f1.4 optics and be planning to sell all but one (really; I'm just too busy at the moment )
28mm and 50mm lenses can pop up like mushrooms in my house if I'm not careful!

Every person who owns a Pentax SLR should have a 50mm lens, doesn't matter if it's manual or autofocus. Those extra 2-4 stops of speed you get over the kit lens can make all the difference in nailing that shot.
12-28-2010, 09:01 AM   #11
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Lowell Goudge's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,892
I can't compare directly as I only have the K50F1.4 and SUper tak 8 element F1.4.,

My 2 M series 50's are the F1.7 and F2.

What I can say is that any time I look at an M series lens (100mm macro excluded) they all feel inconsistent in focus action compared to any K series lens.

the quality of the build just seems to be a little off in comparison.,

It is not a big thing, but noticeable side by side.

just my $0.02
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
50mm, experts, k-mount, k50/1.4, m50/1.4, pentax lens, question, slr lens

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question to the experts - regarding K-5 NR dexmus Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 20 11-03-2010 10:36 AM
A question for the experts Banjo Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 4 10-06-2010 02:38 AM
Question for Helios experts soycory Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 5 10-23-2009 08:55 PM
Pentax M50 1.7 Focusing Question mcpieman Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 2 06-21-2008 06:57 AM
Question on M50/1.4, M*300/4, K24/2.8, LX tranq78 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 8 01-28-2008 12:36 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:42 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top