The fantastic 2018 PF T-shirts are now available!

bigal1000 · 01-19-2011, 10:07 AM

was wondering other opions on either of the following Pentax 18-135 or Pentax 17-70. I know that the 18-135 does have longer reach,not that important to me,just interested mainly on some of your views on build and IQ between these two lenses,thanks.

**grainbelt** · 01-21-2011, 12:19 PM

I don't know that anyone has the 18-135 yet. Suggest you check the lens reviews, as there is quite a body of knowledge there.

Pentax Reviews - Pentax Lens Reviews & Pentax Lens Database

Ash · 01-21-2011, 02:19 PM

If reach is not your motivator, but build and IQ is (and perhaps silent focusing) then the DA* 16-50 sounds like what you may be after. If not for WR, then the Tamron 17-50 is the most logical next choice. Between your two mentioned lenses, it's going to be hard to tell the 'build' of the 18-135 as very few people have actually held it in their hands, but it's been acclaimed to have very decent IQ. The 17-70 is much more widely known, is also SDM but not built anything like a DA*. Check out its reviews in the Lens review database for more info.

MSD · 01-21-2011, 04:47 PM

As Ash said, not many people have the 18-135 yet, so advice is limited there. If reach is not important, though, then...

... Just follow the stars.

RioRico · 01-21-2011, 05:26 PM

If reach is important, then it's important. If reach is NOT important, then what will another lens do that your 18-55 won't do, other than make managers and shareholders at PenHoya happy? No, I'm not trying to restart the KIT LENS DOES/DOESN'T SUCK wars, just wondering about your motivations. Cheers!

paperbag846 · 01-21-2011, 06:37 PM

I would do the 17-70 because it is a little faster at the long end and does not distort as much... but I actually rarely go above 100 so I am super biased, and I am skeptical of any zoom that attempts to do too much.

01-19-2011, 10:07 AM	#1
bigal1000 Inactive Account Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: New Hampshire Posts: 33	looking to replace kit lens and was wondering other opions on either of the following Pentax 18-135 or Pentax 17-70. I know that the 18-135 does have longer reach,not that important to me,just interested mainly on some of your views on build and IQ between these two lenses,thanks.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version E-mail to a Friend	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How about a wide angle to replace my kit lens?	timstone	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	16	04-27-2010 08:08 AM
Suggestion to replace 18-55 kit lens?	sealonsf	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	10	12-15-2009 05:12 PM
Lens to replace k20d kit lens?	kenhreed	Troubleshooting and Beginner Help	19	07-13-2009 01:56 PM
Best lens to replace kit lens? Upgrading from K10 to K7.	swhang	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	8	07-07-2009 08:22 AM
Wide-angle lens to replace K10D kit lens	StacyA1973	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	20	03-07-2008 02:43 PM

01-21-2011, 12:19 PM	#2
grainbelt Site Supporter Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Minneapolis Photos: Albums Posts: 588	I don't know that anyone has the 18-135 yet. Suggest you check the lens reviews, as there is quite a body of knowledge there. Pentax Reviews - Pentax Lens Reviews & Pentax Lens Database

01-21-2011, 02:19 PM	#3
Ash Community Manager Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Toowoomba, Queensland Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 22,734	If reach is not your motivator, but build and IQ is (and perhaps silent focusing) then the DA* 16-50 sounds like what you may be after. If not for WR, then the Tamron 17-50 is the most logical next choice. Between your two mentioned lenses, it's going to be hard to tell the 'build' of the 18-135 as very few people have actually held it in their hands, but it's been acclaimed to have very decent IQ. The 17-70 is much more widely known, is also SDM but not built anything like a DA*. Check out its reviews in the Lens review database for more info.

01-21-2011, 04:47 PM	#4
MSD Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Sydney Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 164	As Ash said, not many people have the 18-135 yet, so advice is limited there. If reach is not important, though, then... ... Just follow the stars.

01-21-2011, 05:26 PM	#5
RioRico Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Limbo, California Posts: 11,264	If reach is important, then it's important. If reach is NOT important, then what will another lens do that your 18-55 won't do, other than make managers and shareholders at PenHoya happy? No, I'm not trying to restart the KIT LENS DOES/DOESN'T SUCK wars, just wondering about your motivations. Cheers!

01-21-2011, 06:37 PM	#6
paperbag846 Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,396	I would do the 17-70 because it is a little faster at the long end and does not distort as much... but I actually rarely go above 100 so I am super biased, and I am skeptical of any zoom that attempts to do too much.

looking to replace kit lens and

The fantastic 2018 PF T-shirts are now available!