Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-05-2011, 11:59 AM   #16
Veteran Member
Jewelltrail's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Photos: Albums
Posts: 4,180
QuoteQuote:
Loren E How do they compare in build quality? Of course neither is weather resistant but if you were to trek around to remote places and see some harsh conditions is does one stand out over another as more likely to get drizzled on a little and make it, or take a few bumps and be no worse for the wear?
Loren, the 17-50mm is built very well. I bought it to accompany me on my extensive, 4-season hiking, throughout the mountains of the Eastern US.


QuoteQuote:
Loren E: I am researching but having trouble finding out: are they both screw-drive AF? And do both have quick-shift from auto to manual focus?
The 17-50 Tamron is screw driven. The new Sigma 17-50 2.8 OS is HSM.

QuoteQuote:
LorenE:This is going to be my low-light lens, so I want both acceptable performance wide-open at 2.8 as well as acceptable auto-focus accuracy in lower light.....I am reading the sigma doesn't do great at F2.8 but not hearing much more then that.....
The Tamron is excelllent wide open, better than any of the lenses mentioned in this thread, retaining sharpness uniformity, even to the extreme borders. The new Sigma 17-50 HSM OS, is sharper in the center wide open, but does not retain its uniformity as well to the extreme borders. The 18-50 Sigma is not nearly as good as the Tamron wide open.

QuoteQuote:
Lorene: Also the sigma has a similar minimum focusing distance, 11 inches, so I am guessing that macro-wise they would do a similar job?
I have shot with the Tamron, not the Sigma--the Tamron is excellent @ close focus. I'm sure you can find pics with the Sigma at close focus if you search the Sigma Club. I advise you to search out these clubs for shots--it helps.

Here is a recent shot (this Fall) with the Tamron 17-50mm 2.8:



02-05-2011, 12:34 PM   #17
Veteran Member




Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 484
Personally, given those choices, I would go for the Sigma 17-50mm, due to HSM. Fast, silent AF is very useful for a normal lens. I went for the 16-50mm, though. It's been two years now without any issues. What sealed the deal for me was the weather-sealing, which has been extremely useful for me as well.

Regarding the macro, the Sigma has a minimum focusing distance of 20cm which translates to 1:3, while the Tamron has 27cm and 1:4.5. I would not base my purchase on this small difference and would personally choose the Tamron!
02-05-2011, 03:11 PM   #18
Senior Member
Loren E's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Washington and California
Posts: 274
Original Poster
Beautiful colors in that image JT.

To clarify guys, I am trying to decide between the tamron 17-50 and the sigma 18-50 ex dc....not the HSM version and not the macro version, this is the earlier version that came out I think in 2004.

Thanks! -LE
02-05-2011, 06:06 PM   #19
Veteran Member
wshi's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 455
Well, it's a shame you're not considering the macro version... I got it today, and went out for some quick shots. I'm quite impressed.







All at f/2.8.

Some more shots here:

Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 EX DC Macro - a set on Flickr

Hope this hasn't made things more complicated!

02-05-2011, 07:14 PM   #20
Senior Member
Loren E's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Washington and California
Posts: 274
Original Poster
Oh man great shots. I am going to need to use a circular polarizer on this lens and want it to only be a temporary lens until pentax figures out the DA* 16-50 so I can get the weather-sealing, so I want to be able to trade filters with my DA* 60-250 without the pain of a step-down ring on a wide angle, and they changed this lens to 72mm filter for the macro version. That's why I want the non macro 67mm version or the tamron 17-50, and it is sounding like the tamron is the better lens but also a bit more expensive
02-05-2011, 07:26 PM   #21
gtl
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 349
Just get the tamron 17-50. I know people who is so satisfied with it that they do not feel the need for the 16-50mm. The 50-135mm however.... Thats a different story.
02-05-2011, 07:30 PM   #22
Senior Member
Loren E's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Washington and California
Posts: 274
Original Poster
The tammy sounds like a great lens, sounds like it beats the sigma I am looking at. I am torn between chancing SDM issues on the DA* 16-50 for the weather-sealing or going with the unsealed tamron. The 50-135 is not a lens that fits in with my kit, as I am getting a 60-250, which luckily sounds like it is less prone to SDM problems than the other two.
02-05-2011, 07:43 PM   #23
Senior Member




Join Date: May 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 197
I've had a Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 EX DC MACRO for about a year now,
use it 99% of the time at f2.8 for night / action photography, solid & reliable performer.

Just for fun a few weeks ago I purchased a Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 and kept it a few days to
do some side by side testing, for sure the extra 1mm (x1.5) at the wide end was
noticeable but can't say it was much sharper wide open than my Sigma.

What I did notice immediately is the lower overall build quality of the Tamron,
very 'plastic' feeling compared to my Sigma.

I returned it a few days later, despite most online reviews that
rate it better than the Sigma, I was not very impressed by the Tamron.

Michel

Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
da*, hsm, k-mount, lens, lenses, macro, os, pentax, pentax lens, sdm, sigma, sigmas, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sigma 18-250 or Pentax/Tamron 18-250? mjbens01 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 3 07-08-2010 09:10 PM
Pentax or Sigma 18-250? Crepusculum Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 09-10-2009 11:27 AM
sigma 18-250 dafiryde Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 0 07-16-2009 04:05 PM
Sigma DP1 prices and pictures, I wonder if Pentax will follow suite. little laker General Talk 11 04-09-2009 08:21 AM
NOTE: DA* 60-250 thread pulled codiac2600 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 122 10-06-2008 09:07 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:51 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top