Originally posted by K57XR ... From what I’ve read so far, using a prime lens is the best way to hone such skills by forcing the photographer to move around and get a different perspective, as opposed to zooming in and out from one spot with a zoom lens. I shoot mostly landscapes ...
What you have said, I believe, is a commonly held misapprehension of the situation (and does not pass closer examination).
The point is: a zoom lens will be of enormoous help in achieving a "tight framing" of your subject from whichever shooting position you take your shot.
on the other hand, "zooming with your feet" (as it is termed) will result in an entirely different composition because changing your position (relative to your subject) will necessarily result in a change in perspective and a consequent change in the composition itself.
Try it for yourself, and you will see that it is impossible to zoom with your feet and still get the same view. Put another way, there are many shots that are impossible to take with a prime lens (unless majorly cropped in PP, with resulting loss of IQ).
In effect, the use of a zoom lens allows you to replicate
in camera the effect you would get by cropping the negative (or cropping digitally) in PP, but it is better than cropping the negative (or digital cropping) because you make full use of the whole negative (or sensor) resulting in better IQ.
This "furphy" (in my opinion) is a hangover from the days when zooms were inferior to primes, but good zoom lenses -for many years now- have been equal (IQ wise) to primes at the corresponding focal lengths for all practical purposes.