Originally posted by Audi 5 cyl Oh, I like it too, I would not be using it otherwise.
It is an asymmetric double-Gauss lens. There are no differences in sharpness and bokeh rendering between Helios and Biotar, it's a same design anyway, the only real difference is in flaring but Helios has so many iterations that flare differently so I can not absolutely claim even that. I prefer the flare of Biotar vs Helios 44-2 and 44M-4, because those are the lenses that I own. That being said, Helios is a lot more pleasant to use as the focusing is smoother, there are no scratches (depends on the example) or bubbles and similar age related issues. It is more simple to disassemble, modify and clean, etc.
When I got my Biotar, it was a part of a lot, came almost for free, but it was a brick. It had plenty of dust and sediment, helicoid was stuck, it felt loose. It took me 3 hours of cleaning to get everything in order and ready to assemble again. Even now, focusing is not sufficiently smooth for my taste but I am still searching for that special, "thin" helicoid grease to come my way.
Helios or Biotar, I like them equally, great lenses that deserve respect. It's a pity they are rarely being used stopped down. Excellent performers and sharp enough, even by today's standards.
This is good information to know, thanks for sharing. If that's the case then I will just look for a Helios since they can be had for cheap.
Apparently the last number in the model e.g. 44-'2' or 44-'7' means how good they are optically; the higher the better. I just ordered a M42 adapter so I will probably start looking to pick one up. I really like that nervous psychedelic looking bokeh.
Originally posted by Riggomatic The clematis is blooming again.
We planted three roses back in July that are doing the same thing. Glad to know they're not the only weirdos :P.