Originally posted by mgbirder Hi Clinton, you beat me on the 100-300mm by 10 minutes :-)!!
Heh, so I heard.
I actually saw it within moments of him posting it through blind luck, but it took me about 20 more minutes to decide to make the purchase. Now I'll be putting off the FA* 24 for a few months.
The FA* 300/4.5 really is nice glass, and it's surprisingly light, but I find the exact 300mm focal length to not be flexible enough for what I'm doing most of the time, hence the purchase of the 100-300.
As Ole pointed out, no tripod collar, which hasn't seemed all that much of an issue for me because it's so light, but I expect it would be more stable with one attached. Especially after you double it with a 2x TC.
AF on it is wicked fast; I expect faster by a fair margin than it's DA* counterpart.