Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-21-2011, 06:41 AM - 1 Like   #31
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago suburbs
Photos: Albums
Posts: 848
I use an FA 35mm f/2.0. Sharp and fast.

02-21-2011, 01:39 PM   #32
Veteran Member
Egg Salad's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 337
QuoteOriginally posted by Class A Quote
The Sigma 28/1.8 EX Macro focuses closer than the Pentax 31/1.8.
Seriously, I like the versatility a close focusing lens like this gives me. And its bokeh is not shabby at all.

If strong-armed, I might trade a 31mm Ltd for it but it has a lot going for it as well.

P.S.: "Normal" is not what you want it to be. You can say a lens corresponds to how you look but that is not the definition of "normal" for a lens. Pentax is hopeless regarding its use of "normal". The Pentax FA 50/1.4 is described as being a normal lens. The times when this has been true have long gone for Pentax...
Not owning the 31 Ltd. I have to say that I find the Sigma 28's bokeh/rendition/whatever absolutely awesome. I would rate its bokeh as a 9. On my lens it is completely circular and smooth. Almost as good as on my Sigma 50 F1.4.

I'm not even sure if I would trade the Sigma for the Pentax (probably yes) - 18cm MFT as opposed to 30cm is a huge difference.
Just wished the Sigma had HSM as well.

Far better value on the Sigma!
02-22-2011, 12:09 PM   #33
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Mexico
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,125
Back in the day, a "normal" lens was one that supposedly provided approximately the same field of view as one's own eyes. A focal length of 45-50mm in 35mm format was considered to meet that criterion, although some argued in favor of 35mm. In any event, one should use that focal length which looks best to oneself. My "normal" lens is unquestionably the 31 Limited, which is the equivalent of a 46mm focal length in 35mm format. It just looks right to me--not too wide and not too long.

Rob
02-22-2011, 12:37 PM   #34
Veteran Member
vizjerei's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,418
+1 for FA35, Still remember the good days where it was just around $300 new.

02-22-2011, 01:37 PM   #35
Senior Member




Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Photos: Albums
Posts: 161
Ultron 40mm f2

From my experience, the Voigtlander Ultron 40mm f2 is the lens you want. I've tried the Pentax-M, Takumars, Leicas, Nikkors, various old Russian and German vintage lenses, the 40mm Ultron beats them all.
02-22-2011, 01:39 PM   #36
Veteran Member
vrrattko's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Photos: Albums
Posts: 734
+2 for FA35, great little lens....
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
fov, k-mount, lens, pentax lens, price, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Program mode: "Auto" vs. "Normal"? PALADIN85020 Pentax K-5 3 02-13-2011 12:22 PM
"Normal" lens? wildman Photographic Technique 68 07-19-2010 12:11 AM
Cheap "normal" lens for Pentax APS montecarlo Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 06-01-2009 09:08 PM
And the best "normal" Pentax lens is... FHPhotographer Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 08-04-2008 04:17 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:43 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top