Originally posted by K206 I think I will have to keep the 15 in the bag. Although I have used it mostly for architecture, etc. and my shots have not been amazing yet, I think I just need to get more creative with it. It will be too valuable as a wide angle in the narrow streets of Europe...
Also, I will just have to make a choice b/w the 35 and 40 which have many threads (one started by me). I am leaning 35 right now...(the question is still whether to sell the 40).
I am going to get the 70. I have nothing similar and it sounds like it rocks. For travel it might be a "specialty" area for me as I don't shoot a ton of mid tele, but it will be super useful sometimes and in non-travel situations (portraiture).
So my basic travel kit would be 15/35/70...
So I guess my questions have boiled down to whether the 21 is a nice addition to fill the gap (of which there are other threads I have been reading). And whether I should splurge on the 21 instead of getting the kit with the K-7. Perhaps I should start another thread. But feel free to chime in with any additional thoughts...
The 21mm is my favorite lens, and if I only had one lens, it would be it. But to be fair, on 35mm I prefer 35mm as my normal lens. My 43mm is a fantastic lens but it's too long. 35mm is a better FL 52 vs 62 is somehow just enough.
I like the idea of the fuji x100 btw, as a backup and a fast 35mm prime. Great idea. My backup is my fuji x10. I think having two bodies is essential.
If I was bringing a 3 lens kit, it would be 15, 21, 70. If I brought a tripod (carbon, lightweight, just functional) and my panoramic head, I'd opt for either the 35 or 43mm as well.
The 21 would be on the camera most of the time, with the 15 and 70 being situation lenses. The 15 is, imo, too wide for a standard lens.