So...I have a 16-45 which has been a decent performer but would be made redundant if I got this 18-135. Or would it? I'd gain a lot of reach, and waterresistanceness
But would I miss anything about the 16-45?
Does anyone here have experience with that?
I made my wife use the K-10 and 10-17 a few weeks ago at a park and she said it was interesting. (I was using a manual 50mm and having fun). She did say she wants a "mommy lens" aka super-zoom for flexibility. I understand that, but want at least one weather-resistant lens.
Anyone have experience with both lenses they can share?