Edit[4/3/2011]:
I discovered what I beleive to be the main source of my blury 16-50 problem, and it watches me shave every morning in the mirror. Short version: Turn SR off when mounting lens on tri-pod for AF fine tuning. Thank you "Magic Lantern Guide" for pointing out my folly! After receiving & reading through most of the MLG this weekend, I re-ran the DA*16-50mm AF calibration test [SR off!] and it was 'dead-on', +/-0 adjustment needed. It is a testament to the lens design that I did get some decent shots out of it, even though it was grossly mis-calibrated by it's 'clueless' owner at -6.
This also points out that my K7 is likely innocent of any charges that it has a shutter-blur issue.
Original post:
Has your DA*16-50 lens delievered sharper photos with your K5?
Sharper than the pictures produced with the lens mounted on a K7?
I just got wind of the K7 shutter blur issue last week. I've spent most of the past week reading all the posts, reports and white papers about this issue.
And all this time prior, I've been suspicious of my DA*16-50 for so many 'unsatisfatory' wide angle shots. Lots of throw aways due to lack of sharpness and detail. In stark contrast, my DA*50-135 and FA*200 consistantly deliever very sharp images from my K7. Throw-aways with these lenses are rarely due to lack of crystal clear detail. So until now, I was not suspicious of the K7 at all.
Until I stumbled across the K7 shutter blur posts last week, I had actually been thinking about replacing my DA*16-50 with a FA*28-70 [legendary for it's sharpness].
Maybe I should be looking at replacing the K7 with a K5 instead?
K7, K5, DA*16-50mm users:
Has your DA*16-50 lens delievered consistantly sharper photos with your K5?
Last edited by Moe49; 04-04-2011 at 06:27 AM.