Originally posted by testdasi Someone suggested me to buy the Sigma 50-150 f2.8 instead of the DA* 50-135. Does any one have any experience with the Sigma lens? What are the common problems with the lens?
Any help/info/comment is greatly appreciated.
I bought the Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 in November, and I couldn't be happier. It's not much bigger than my Pentax 55-300mm. Build quality is top-notch, and the HSM autofocus is super fast and super quiet. It's a great portrait lens for when you want to keep some distance. I've found that it has allowed me to get some great close-up candid portraits of children since you can be all the way across the room and they don't even realize you're photographing them.
The only common problem I'm aware of is focus accuracy at close distances. My copy does not always focus accurately when the subject is closer than 10 feet. But I think this is just a weakness inherent in the design of a lens optimized to be used at a distance. From what I've heard most f/2.8 mid-to-long telephotos don't do great at close distances. But beyond 10 or 15 feet my 50-150mm has extremely accurate autofocus.
If I'm planning to shoot closer than 10 feet, I use my Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8. That lens almost works as a macro and can focus on subjects just inches in front of it.
I'll post some of my favorite shots from this lens in a few minutes.